Teaching Inclusive Thinking to Undergraduate Students in Computing Programs

ABSTRACT

An increasing importance of accessibility awareness and knowledge emanates from a moral imperative and as an employment differentiator. It is important that educational programs have a demonstrated ability to teach these skills. In this paper, we focus on the role that educational courses can play in increasing accessibility awareness for undergraduate students. We review literature indicating that a number of accessibility teaching interventions have been reported; yet the evaluation of their effectiveness has not been conducted in a consistent manner. We report on our 3-semester evaluation of undergraduate students' accessibility awareness and knowledge following a week of accessibility lectures as part of courses on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), where a subset of students also interact with stakeholders with disabilities during the conduct of the course projects. Gains in awareness and knowledge occur when accessibility lectures were part of the course. These gains are compared across the teams who interacted with a person with a disability and teams with no such interaction. In addition, we provide the test battery developed to measure these skills, to enable other researchers to conduct evaluations of the effectiveness of interventions for teaching inclusive thinking in undergraduate computing at their own institutions.

References

1. ACM Ethics. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from https://ethics.acm.org/
2. Buckley, M., Kershner, H., Schindler, K., Alphonce, C., Braswell, J. 2004. Benefits of using socially-relevant projects in computer science and engineering education. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM, New York, NY, 482--486.
3. Jim A. Carter and David W. Fourney. 2007. Techniques to assist in developing accessibility engineers. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, NY, 123--130.
4. Computer Science Curriculum 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. 2013. Retrieved 20 April, 2017 from https://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf
5. Chris Forlin, Gerard Fogarty, & Annemaree Caroll. 1999. Validation of the factor structure of the Interactions with Disabled Persons Scale. Australian J. of Psychology, 51(1), 50--55.
6. Lindsay Gething and Barbara Wheeler. 1992. The Interaction with Disabled Persons scale: A new Australian instrument to measure attitudes toward people with disabilities. Australian J. of Psychology, 44 (22), 75--82.
7. Matt Huenerfauth. 2010. Participation of high school and undergraduate students who are deaf in research on American Sign Language animation. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 97 (June 2010), 14--24.
8. Maurits Kaptein and Judy Robertson. 2012. Rethinking statistical analysis methods for CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, USA, 1105--1114.
9. Andrew J. Ko and Richard E. Ladner. 2016. Access Computing Promotes Teaching Accessibility. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (November 2016), 65--68.
10. Richard E. Ladner and Matt May. 2017. Teaching Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 691--692.
11. Jonathan Lazar, Alfreda Dudley-Sponaugle, Kisha-Dawn Greenidge. 2004. Improving Web Accessibility: A Study of Webmaster Perceptions. Computers and Human Behavior, 20(2), 269--288.
12. Sarah Lewthwaite and David Sloan. 2016. Exploring pedagogical culture for accessibility education in computing science. In Proceedings of the 13th Web for All Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 4 pages.
13. Stephanie Ludi. 2007. Introducing accessibility requirements through external stakeholder utilization in an undergraduate requirements engineering course. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '07). IEEE Computer Society, 736--743.
14. Jennifer Mankoff. 2006. Practical service learning issues in HCI. In Proceedings of CHI EA '06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201--206.
15. MIT. 2015. 6.811: Principles and Practices of Assistive Technology (PPAT), Fall 2014. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from http://courses.csail.mit.edu/PPAT/fall2014/
16. Geoff Norman. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv in Health Sci Educ (2010) 15:625--632.
17. Helen L. Petrie and Alistair Edwards. 2006. Inclusive design and assistive technology as part of the HCI curriculum. In Proceedings of HCI Educators Workshop 2006. Pp. 23--24.
18. Cynthia Putnam, Maria Dahman, Emma Rose, Jinghui Cheng, and Glenn Bradford. 2016. Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms: Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 4, Article 13 (March 2016), 26 pages.
19. Brian J. Rosmaita. 2006. Accessibility first! A new approach to web design. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 270--274.
20. Shinohara, K., Bennett, C. L., and Wobbrock. J. O. (2016). How designing for people with and without disabilities shapes student design thinking. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '07). ACM, NY, USA, 123--130.
21. Kathleen Tait and Nola Purdie. 2000. Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47:1, 25--38.
22. Teach Access. 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from http://teachaccess.org
23. Waller, A., Hanson, V.L., Sloan, D. 2009. Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 155--162.
24. WebAIM. (2014). "Survey of Web Accessibility Practitioner Results." Retrieved April 28, 2017. http://webaim.org/projects/practitionersurvey/
25. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 30--4
26. Johnny Saldana. 2009. A coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
27. John L. Campbell, Charles Quincy, Jordan Osserman, and Ove K. Pedersen. 2013. "Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 3 (August 2013), 294--320.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Accessibility

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education