skip to main content
10.1145/3148011.3154477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Local Event Discovery from Tweets Metadata

Published:04 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a two-step strategy that addresses fundamental deficiencies in social media-based event detection and achieves effective local event by taking advantage of geo-located data from Twitter. While previous work has mainly relied on an analysis of tweet text to identify local events, we show how to reliably detect events using meta-data analysis of geo-tagged tweets. The first step of the method identifies several spatio-temporal clusters within the dataset across both space and time using metadata to form potential candidate events. In the second step, it ranks all the candidates by the amount of hashtag/entity inequality. We used crowdsourcing to evaluate the proposed approach on a data set that contains millions of geo-tagged tweets. The results show that our framework performs reasonably well in terms of precision and discovers local events faster.

References

  1. Hamed Abdelhaq, Christian Sengstock, and Michael Gertz. 2013. Eventweet: Online localized event detection from twitter. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 6, 12 (2013), 1326--1329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C Aggarwal and Karthik Subbian. 2012. Event Detection in Social Streams. In SDM, Vol. 12. SIAM, 624--635.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. James W Buehler, Ruth L Berkelman, David M Hartley, and Clarence J Peters. 2003. Syndromic surveillance and bioterrorism-related epidemics. Emerging infectious diseases 9, 10 (2003), 1197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tao Cheng and Thomas Wicks. 2014. Event detection using Twitter: a spatio-temporal approach. PloS one 9, 6 (2014), e97807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Peacock B Evans M, Hastings N. 2000. Statistical distributions, 3rd Ed. New York: Wiley. 221 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin Kulldorff. 1997. A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics-Theory and methods 26, 6 (1997), 1481--1496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Florian Kunneman and Antal van den Bosch. 2014. Event detection in Twitter: A machine-learning approach based on term pivoting. In Grootjen, F.; Otworowska, M.; Kwisthout, J.(ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University, 65--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Janette Lehmann, Bruno Gonçalves, José J Ramasco, and Ciro Cattuto. 2012. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chenliang Li, Aixin Sun, and Anwitaman Datta. 2012. Twevent: segment-based event detection from tweets. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 155--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gözde Özbal, Carlo Strapparava, Rada Mihalcea, and Daniele Pighin. 2011. A comparison of unsupervised methods to associate colors with words. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Springer, 42--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ana-Maria Popescu and Marco Pennacchiotti. 2010. Detecting controversial events from twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1873--1876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yanxia Qin, Yue Zhang, Min Zhang, and Dequan Zheng. 2013. Feature-Rich Segment-Based News Event Detection on Twitter. In IJCNLP. 302--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 851--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jagan Sankaranarayanan, Hanan Samet, Benjamin E Teitler, Michael D Lieberman, and Jon Sperling. 2009. Twitterstand: news in tweets. In Proceedings of the 17th acm sigspatial international conference on advances in geographic information systems. ACM, 42--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Toshiro Tango and Kunihiko Takahashi. 2005. A flexibly shaped spatial scan statistic for detecting clusters. International journal of health geographics 4, 1 (2005), 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kazufumi Watanabe, Masanao Ochi, Makoto Okabe, and Rikio Onai. 2011. Jasmine: a real-time local-event detection system based on geolocation information propagated to microblogs. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2541--2544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jianshu Weng and Bu-Sung Lee. 2011. Event Detection in Twitter. ICWSM 11 (2011), 401--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Local Event Discovery from Tweets Metadata

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        K-CAP '17: Proceedings of the 9th Knowledge Capture Conference
        December 2017
        271 pages
        ISBN:9781450355537
        DOI:10.1145/3148011

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 December 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of198submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader