skip to main content
10.1145/3147704.3147732acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Aspect Frames: Describing Cross-Cutting Concerns in Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cross-cutting concerns often arise when non-functional requirements are operationalized, because non-functional requirements are themselves cross-cutting. In the field of aspect-oriented requirements engineering (AORE), functional requirements that cross-cut multiple other functional requirements are called aspects. An aspect describes in most cases a solution for a non-functional requirement and how this solution can be integrated into the realization of the functional requirements it cross-cuts. Examples for cross-cutting concerns are logging, encryption, and access control. We observed that aspects often share a basic structure, behavior, and the way of how they have to be integrated into the realization of the functional requirements they cross-cut. We propose in this paper aspect frames. An aspect frame is a kind of pattern for aspects that share a common concern, behavior, and way how they are integrated into the realization of the functional requirements they cross-cut. These aspect frames support requirements engineers to describe concrete aspects that fit to an aspect frame.

References

  1. Azadeh Alebrahim, Thein Than Tun, Yijun Yu, Maritta Heisel, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2012. An Aspect-Oriented Approach to Relating Security Requirements and Access Control. InProceedings of the CAiSE'12 Forum at the 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings), Vol. 855. CEUR-WS.org, 15--22. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-855/paper2.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Siobhán Clarke and Robert J. Walker. 2001. Composition Patterns: An Approach to Designing Reusable Aspects. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2001, 12-19 May 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Hausi A. Müller, Mary Jean Harrold, and Wilhelm Schäfer (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 5--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Stephan Faßbender, Maritta Heisel, and Rene Meis. 2014. Aspect-oriented Requirements Engineering with Problem Frames. In ICSOFT-PT 2014 - Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Software Paradigm Trends. SciTePress, 145--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stephan Faßbender, Maritta Heisel, and Rene Meis. 2015. A Problem-, Quality-, and Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering Method. In Software Technologies - 9th International Joint Conference, ICSOFT 2014, Vienna, Austria, August 29-31, 2014, Revised Selected Papers (Communications in Computer and Information Science), Vol. 555. Springer, 291--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alessandro Garcia, Cláudio Sant'Anna, Eduardo Figueiredo, Uirá Kulesza, Carlos Lucena, and Arndt von Staa. 2006.Modularizing Design Patterns with Aspects: A Quantitative Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 36--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael Jackson. 2001. Problem Frames. Analyzing and structuring software development problems. Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gregor Kiczales, John Lamping, Anurag Mendhekar, Chris Maeda, Cristina Videira Lopes, Jean-Marc Loingtier, and John Irwin. 1997. Aspect-Oriented Programming. In ECOOP. Springer, 220--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maria Lencastre, Ana Moreira, João Araźjo, and Jaelson Castro. 2008. Aspects Composition in Problem Frames. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society, 343--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rene Meis and Maritta Heisel. 2017. Pattern-based Representation of Privacy Enhancing Technologies as Early Aspects. In Trust, Privacy, and Security in Digital Business (LNCS), Vol. 10442. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 49--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ana Moreira, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Joo Arajo, and Awais Rashid. 2013. Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering. Springer Publishing Company. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Narender Singh and Nasib Singh Gill. 2011. Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering for Advanced Separation of Concerns: A Review. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues 8, 5 (September 2011), 288--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tim Wellhausen and Andreas Fießer. 2011. How to write a pattern?: a rough guide for first-time pattern authors. In 16th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, EuroPLoP 2011. ACM, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Aspect Frames: Describing Cross-Cutting Concerns in Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EuroPLoP '17: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
        July 2017
        566 pages
        ISBN:9781450348485
        DOI:10.1145/3147704

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        EuroPLoP '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of53submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate216of354submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader