ABSTRACT
Interpersonal social networks play a critical role in increasing turnout through voter cooperation and coordination. However, different contexts and institutions can inhibit this type of coordination by increasing voter uncertainty. We examine one mechanism by which third party entry in plurality voting systems might decrease turnout by increasing voter confusion about the political preferences of their fellow citizens. We extend the Fowler Turnout in a Small World model [18], providing theoretical evidence that voters may be disincentivized to turn out under three party competition in single member district plurality systems. Finally, we support our theoretical work with an examination of turnout in modern British elections, which provides empirical support for our theoretical findings.
- James Adams and Alexander K Mayer. 2008. Condorcet Efficiency with Adaptive Parties in a Spatial Model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 48, 9--10 (2008), 1298--1307. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John H Aldrich. 1993. Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37, 1 (1993), 246--278.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Bendor, Daniel Diermeier, David A Siegel, and Michael M. Ting. 2011. A Behavioral Theory of Elections. Princeton.Google Scholar
- Andre Blais. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andre Blais. 2006. What Affects Voter Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science 9 (2006), 111--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andre Blais and Kees Aarts. 2006. Electoral Systems and Turnout. Acta Politica 41, 2 (2006), 180--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert M. Bond, Christopher J. Fariss, Jason J. Jones, Adam D. I. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle, and James H. Fowler. 2012. A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization. Nature 489 (2012), 295--298.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carew Boulding and David S Brown. 2015. Do Political Parties Matter for Turnout? Number of Parties, Electoral Rules, and Local Elections in Brazil and Boliva. Party Politics 21, 3 (2015), 404--416.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shuan Bowler, David Brockington, and Todd Donovan. 2001. Election Systems and Voter Turnout: Experiments in the United States. Journal of Politics 63, 3 (2001), 902--915.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pradeep Chhibber and Ken Kollman. 1998. Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States. The American Political Science Review 92, 2 (1998), 329--342.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gary W Cox. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gary W Cox. 2015. Electoral Rules, Mobilization, and Turnout. Annual Review of Political Science 18 (2015), 49--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul A Djupe and Anand Edward Sokhey. 2014. The Distribution and Determinants of Socially Supplied Political Expertise. American Politics Research 42, 2 (2014), 199--225.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anthony Downs. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper.Google Scholar
- Maurice Durverger. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Aaron Edlin, Andrew Gelman, and Noah Kaplan. 2007. Voting as the Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others. Rationality and Society 19, 3 (2007), 293--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John A Ferejohn and Morris P Fiorina. 1974. The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis. The American Political Science Review 68, 2 (1974), 525--536.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James H Fowler. 2005. Turnout in a Small World. In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Alan S. Zuckerman (Ed.). Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- James H Fowler and Oleg Smirnov. 2005. Dynamic Parties and Social Turnout: An Agent-Based Model. The American Journal of Sociology 110, 4 (2005), 1070--1094.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernard Grofman and Peter Selb. 2011. Turnout and the (Effective) Number of Parties at the National and District Levels: A Puzzle Solving Approach. Party Politics 17, 1 (2011), 93--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Huckfeldt. 2001. The Social Communication of Political Expertise. American Journal of Political Science 45, 2 (2001), 425--438.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Huckfeldt and John Sprague. 1992. Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass. The American Political Science Review 86, 1 (1992), 70--86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert W Jackman. 1987. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. The American Political Science 81, 2 (1987), 405--423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Casey A. Klofstad. 2007. Talk Leads to Recruitment: How Discussions About Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation. Political Research Quarterly 60, 2 (2007), 180--191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Laver. 2005. Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition. American Political Science Review 99, 2 (2005), 263--281.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Laver and Ernest Sergenti. 2011. Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philip Lynch. 2007. Party System Change in Britain: Multi-Party Politics in a Multi-Level Polity. British Politics 2, 3 (2007), 323--346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott D. McClurg. 2003. Social Networks and Political Participation: The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation. Political Research Quarterly 56, 4 (2003), 449--464.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caitlin Milazzo. 2015. Getting it Right When it Counts: Constituency Marginality and Voter Perceptions of British Parties' Policy Positions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinions and Parties 25, 2 (2015), 111--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pipa Norris. 2005. The British Parliamentary Constituency Database, 1992--2005. Release 1.3. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Pipa Norris. 2010. May 6th British General Election Constituency Results Release 5.0. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Thomas Plumper and Christian W Martian. 2008. Multi-Party Competition: A Computational Model with Abstention and Memory. Electoral Studies 27, 3 (2008), 424--441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone. 2008. Three's a Crowd: The Dynamic of Third Parties, Ross Perot, and Republican Resurgence. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- William H Riker. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. The American Political Science Review 74, 2 (1980), 432--446.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William H Riker and Peter C Ordeshook. 1968. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review 62, 1 (1968), 25--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meredith Rolfe. 2012. Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Barry Ryan. 2011. Social Networks as a Shortcut to Correct Voting. American Journal of Political Science 55, 4 (2011), 753--766.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Siaroff and Jared Wesley. 2015. Comparative Voter Turnout in the Canadian Provinces since 1965: The Importance of Context. Canadian Political Science Review 9, 1 (2015), 147--163.Google Scholar
- Betsy Sinclair. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Jae Jae Spoon. 2011. Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Greg Vonnahme. 2012. Registration Deadline and Turnout in Context. Political Behavior 34, 4 (2012), 765--779.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Third Parties, Turnout, and Social Influence: Why Third Party Entry May Decrease Turnout in Plurality Systems
Recommendations
Social Media Use and Political Mobilization
This article describes how political participation is a central component of democracy. Past research has found that a variety of factors drive individual decisions about participation, including the media that citizens use to gain political ...
Number of Parties, Endogenous Partisan Preferences, and Electoral Turnout Rates
This article analyzes the impact of the number of parties on turnout rates within an endogenous partisan preference framework. Our results show that the turnout increases in the number of parties under various levels of individual propensity to abstain. ...
Election Control Through Social Influence with Unknown Preferences
Computing and CombinatoricsAbstractThe election control problem through social influence asks to find a set of nodes in a social network of voters to be the starters of a political campaign aiming at supporting a given target candidate. Voters reached by the campaign change their ...
Comments