skip to main content
10.1145/3132525.3134808acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Public Access

Teaching Inclusive Thinking in Undergraduate Computing

Published:19 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increasing importance of accessibility awareness and knowledge as both a moral imperative and an employment differentiator, it is incumbent on educational programs to have demonstrated ability to teach these skills. We report on our year-long evaluation of university students' accessibility awareness and knowledge following a week of accessibility lectures as part of courses on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). We report gains in awareness and knowledge when accessibility lectures were part of the course. We describe the test battery developed to measure these skills, and describe our ongoing longitudinal research to measure the effectiveness of several interventions for teaching inclusive thinking in undergraduate computing courses.

References

  1. Computer Science Curriculum 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. 2013. Retrieved 20 April, 2017 from https://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ladner, R.E., May, M. 2017. Teaching Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 691-692. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lewthwaite, S., Sloan, D. 2016. Exploring pedagogical culture for accessibility education in computing science. In Proceedings of the 13th Web for All Conference (W4A '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ludi, S. 2007. Introducing accessibility requirements through external stakeholder utilization in an undergraduate requirements engineering course. In Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 736-743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Putnam, C., Dahman, M., Rose, E., Cheng, J., Bradford, G. 2016. Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms: Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 4, Article 13 (March 2016), 26 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Teach Access. 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from http://teachaccess.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shinohara, K., Bennett, C. L., Wobbrock. J. O. 2016. How designing for people with and without disabilities shapes student design thinking. In Proc. 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123-130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Teaching Inclusive Thinking in Undergraduate Computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '17: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2017
        450 pages
        ISBN:9781450349260
        DOI:10.1145/3132525

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 October 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate28of126submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader