skip to main content
research-article

Participatory Sensing or Participatory Nonsense?: Mitigating the Effect of Human Error on Data Quality in Citizen Science

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Citizen Science with mobile and wearable technology holds the possibility of unprecedented observation systems. Experts and policy makers are torn between enthusiasm and scepticism regarding the value of the resulting data, as their decision making traditionally relies on high-quality instrumentation and trained personnel measuring in a standardized way. In this paper, we (1) present an empirical behavior taxonomy of errors exhibited in non-expert smartphone-based sensing, based on four small exploratory studies, and discuss measures to mitigate their effects. We then present a large summative study (N=535) that compares instructions and technical measures to address these errors, both from the perspective of improvements to error frequency and perceived usability. Our results show that (2) technical measures without explanation notably reduce the perceived usability and (3) technical measures and instructions nicely complement each other: Their combination achieves a significant reduction in observed error rates while not affecting the user experience negatively.

References

  1. Harini Alagarai Sampath, Rajeev Rajeshuni, and Bipin Indurkhya. 2014. Cognitively Inspired Task Design to Improve User Performance on Crowdsourcing Platforms. In 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, 3665--3674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Victoria Bellotti and Keith Edwards. 2001. Intelligibility and accountability: human considerations in context-aware systems. Human--Computer Interaction 16, 2-4 (2001), 193--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Rick Bonney, Jennifer L Shirk, Tina B Phillips, Andrea Wiggins, Heidi L Ballard, Abraham J Miller-Rushing, Julia K Parrish, et al. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 6178 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. John Brooke. 1996. SUS -- A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189 (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Matthias Budde, Pierre Barbera, Rayan El Masri, Till Riedel, and Michael Beigl. 2013. Retrofitting Smartphones to be Used as Particulate Matter Dosimeters. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Matthias Budde, Marcel Köpke, and Michael Beigl. 2015. Robust In-situ Data Reconstruction from Poisson Noise for Low-cost, Mobile, Non-expert Environmental Sensing. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’15). ACM, 179--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matthias Budde, Rikard Öxler, Michael Beigl, and Jussi Holopainen. 2016. Sensified Gaming -- Design Patterns and Game Design Elements for Gameful Environmental Sensing. In 13th Int. Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Matthias Budde, Lin Zhang, and Michael Beigl. 2014. Distributed, Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensing: Scenarios, Challenges, Approaches. In ProScience, Vol. 1. (Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Atmospheric Dust (DUST2014)).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeffrey A Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, Andrew Parker, Nithya Ramanathan, Sasank Reddy, and Mani B Srivastava. 2006. Participatory sensing. Center for Embedded Network Sensing (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Delphine Christin, Andreas Reinhardt, Salil S. Kanhere, and Matthias Hollick. 2011. A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications. Journal of Systems and Software 84, 11 (2011). Mobile Applications: Status and Trends. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 1 (2001), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anind K. Dey and Alan Newberger. 2009. Support for Context-aware Intelligibility and Control. In CHI ’09. ACM, 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J St BT Evans. 1988. The knowledge elicitation problem: a psychological perspective. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 7, 2 (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mary M Gardiner, Leslie L Allee, Peter MJ Brown, John E Losey, Helen E Roy, and Rebecca Rice Smyth. 2012. Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 9 (2012), 471--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Steven K. Gibb. 2015. Volunteers Against Pollution. Chemical 8 Engineering News (C8EN) 93, 36 (Sept. 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, Civic Engagement 8 Trust. In 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2833--2842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. John D Hoyt and Harry Wechsler. 1994. Detection of human speech in structured noise. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1994. ICASSP-94., 1994 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, II--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuan Lun Huang, Salil S Kanhere, and Wen Hu. 2010. Are you contributing trustworthy data?: the case for a reputation system in participatory sensing. In Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eiman Kanjo. 2010. Noisespy: A real-time mobile phone platform for urban noise monitoring and mapping. Mobile Networks and Applications 15, 4 (2010), 562--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sunyoung Kim, Jennifer Mankoff, and Eric Paulos. 2013. Sensr: Evaluating a Flexible Framework for Authoring Mobile Data-collection Tools for Citizen Science. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’13). ACM, 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sunyoung Kim, Christine Robson, Thomas Zimmerman, Jeffrey Pierce, and Eben M. Haber. 2011. Creek Watch: Pairing Usefulness and Usability for Successful Citizen Science. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11). ACM, 2125--2134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Eli Kintisch. 2011. How to Grow Your Own Army of Citizen Scientists. (24 Feb. 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Simon Klakegg, Chu Luo, Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2016. Instrumenting Smartphones with Portable NIRS. In Adj. Proceedings UbiComp’16, Workshop in Ubiquitous Mobile Instrumentation (UbiMI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. N.D. Lane, E. Miluzzo, Hong Lu, D. Peebles, T. Choudhury, and A.T. Campbell. 2010. A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine 48, 9 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. B. Laugwitz, T. Held, and M. Schrepp. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group. Springer, 63--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kurt Luther, Scott Counts, Kristin B. Stecher, Aaron Hoff, and Paul Johns. 2009. Pathfinder: An Online Collaboration Environment for Citizen Scientists. In Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’09). ACM, 239--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nicolas Maisonneuve, Matthias Stevens, and Bartek Ochab. 2010. Participatory noise pollution monitoring using mobile phones. In Information Polity. Vol. 15. 51 -- 71. Issue 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sebastian Matyas, Peter Kiefer, Christoph Schlieder, and Sara Kleyer. 2011. Wisdom about the Crowd: Assuring Geospatial Data Quality Collected in Location-Based Games. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC 2011). 331--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. George A. Miller. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 91 (1956), 81--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. L. A. Muratori, P. Salomoni, and G. Pau. 2011. Feeling the pack: Strategies for an optimal participatory system to sense and recognize noise pollution. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Berlin (ICCE -Berlin). 17--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Donald A. Norman. 1983. Design Rules Based on Analyses of Human Error. Commun. ACM 26, 4 (April 1983), 254--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Donald A. Norman and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2015. DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. She Ji 1 (2015), 83--106. Issue 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. DG Novick and K Ward. 2006. Why Don’t People Read the Manual?. In Int. Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC ’06). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. L. Peterson and M. Peterson. 1959. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1959).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rajib Kumar Rana, Chun Tung Chou, Salil S Kanhere, Nirupama Bulusu, and Wen Hu. 2010. Ear-phone: an end-to-end participatory urban noise mapping system. In 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 105--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sasank Reddy, Deborah Estrin, and Mani Srivastava. 2010. Recruitment Framework for Participatory Sensing Data Collections. In Pervasive Computing. LNCS, Vol. 6030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. I. Schweizer, R. Bärtl, A. Schulz, F. Probst, and M. Mühläuser. 2011. NoiseMap -- real-time participatory noise maps. In PhoneSense’11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. L. See, A. Comber, C. Salk, S. Fritz, M. van der Velde, C. Perger, C. Schill, I. McCallum, F. Kraxner, and M. Obersteiner. 2013. Comparing the Quality of Crowdsourced Data Contributed by Expert and Non-Experts. PLoS ONE 8, 7 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. S Andrew Sheppard and Loren Terveen. 2011. Quality is a verb: the operationalization of data quality in a citizen science community. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. S. Andrew Sheppard, Andrea Wiggins, and Loren Terveen. 2014. Capturing Quality: Retaining Provenance for Curated Volunteer Monitoring Data. In 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW ’14). ACM, 1234--1245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. F Snik, JHH Rietjens, A Apituley, H Volten, B Mijling, A Di Noia, S Heikamp, RC Heinsbroek, OP Hasekamp, and JM Smit. 2014. Mapping atmospheric aerosols with a citizen science network of smartphone spectropolarimeters. Geophysical Research Letters 41, 20 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. John Sweller. 2002. Visualisation and instructional design. In International Workshop on Dynamic Visualizations and Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Brett Amy Thelen and Rachel K. Thiet. 2008. Cultivating connection: Incorporating meaningful citizen science into Cape Cod National Seashore’s estuarine research and monitoring programs. Park Science 25, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. A. Truskinger, Haofan Yang, J. Wimmer, Jinglan Zhang, I. Williamson, and P. Roe. 2011. Large Scale Participatory Acoustic Sensor Data Analysis: Tools and Reputation Models to Enhance Effectiveness. In E-Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Kathleen Tuite, Noah Snavely, Dun-yu Hsiao, Nadine Tabing, and Zoran Popovic. 2011. PhotoCity: Training Experts at Large-scale Image Acquisition Through a Competitive Game. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11). ACM, 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. VDA-QMC. 2011. Messsystem und Messprozess sind zweierlei. QZ 56, 5 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Christopher D Wickens, John Lee, Yili D Liu, and Sallie Gordon-Becker. 2014. Introduction to Human Factors Engineering: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed. Second Edition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Andrea Wiggins and Yurong He. 2016. Community-based Data Validation Practices in Citizen Science. In 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW ’16). ACM, 1548--1559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Patricia Wright. 1981. “The instructions clearly state …” can’t people read? Applied Ergonomics 12 (September 1981), 131--141. Issue 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Poonam Yadav and John Darlington. 2016. Design Guidelines for the User-Centred Collaborative Citizen Science Platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.00910 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Participatory Sensing or Participatory Nonsense?: Mitigating the Effect of Human Error on Data Quality in Citizen Science

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
          September 2017
          2023 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3139486
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 September 2017
          • Accepted: 1 June 2017
          • Revised: 1 May 2017
          • Received: 1 February 2017
          Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader