Barriers to refactoring

Abstract

Developers know refactoring improves their software, but many find themselves unable to do so when they want to.

References

1. Bavota, G., Oliveto, R., Gethers, M., Poshyvanyk, D., and De Lucia, A. Methodbook: Recommending move method refactorings via relational topic models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 40, 7 (July 2014), 671--694.
2. Baxter, G., Frean, M., Noble, J., Rickerby, M., Smith, H., Visser, M., Melton, H., and Tempero, E. Understanding the shape of Java software. In Proceedings of the 21^st Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (Oct. 2006), 397--412.
3. Chen, J., Xiao, J., Wang, Q., Osterweil, L.J., and Li, M. Perspectives on refactoring planning and practice: An empirical study. Empirical Software Engineering 21, 3 (June 2016), 1397--1436.
4. Chidamber, S.R., Darcy, D.P., and Kemerer, C.F. Managerial use of metrics for object-oriented software: An exploratory analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24, 8 (Aug. 1998), 629--639.
5. Chidamber, S.R. and Kemerer, C.F. A metrics suite for object-oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20, 6 (June 1994), 476--493.
6. Fowler, M. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1999.
7. Gorschek, T., Tempero, E., and Angelis, L. A large-scale empirical study of practitioners' use of object-oriented concepts. In Proceedings of the 32^nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (Cape Town, South Africa, 2010), 115--124.
8. Harun, M.F. and Lichter, H. Towards a technical debt-management framework based on cost-benefit analysis. In Proceedings of the 10^th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (Barcelona, Spain). International Academy, Research, and Industry Association, 2015.
9. Kazman, R., Cai, Y., Mo, R., Xiao, L., Feng, Q., Haziyev, S., Fedak, V., and Shapochka, A. A case study in locating the architectural roots of technical debt. In Proceedings of the 37^th International Conference on Software Engineering (Firenze, Italy). IEEE Press, 2015.
10. Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., and Nagappan, N. A field study of refactoring challenges and benefits. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (Cary, NC). ACM Press, New York, 2012, article 50.
11. Murphy-Hill, E. and Black, A.P. Refactoring tools: Fitness for purpose. IEEE Software 25, 5 (Sept.-Oct. 2008), 38--44.
12. Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., and Black, A.P. How we refactor, and how we know it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38, 1 (Jan. 2012), 5--18.
13. Robson, C. and McCartan, K. Real World Research, Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.
14. Saldana, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Third Edition. SAGE Publications Ltd., 2016.
15. Shatnawi, R., Li, W., Swain, J., and Newman, T. Finding software metrics threshold values using ROC curves. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 22, 1 (Jan. 2010), 1--16.
16. Szöke, G., Nagy, C., Ferenc, R., and Gyimóthy, T. A case study of refactoring large-scale industrial systems to efficiently improve source code. In Proceedings of the 14^th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (Guirnaräes, Portugal, June 30--July 3). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2014, 524--540.
17. Vakilian, M., Chen, N., Negara, S., Rajkumar, B.A., Bailey, B.P., and Johnson, R.E. Use, disuse, and misuse of automated refactorings. In Proceedings of the 34^th International Conference on Software Engineering (Zurich, Switzerland). IEEE Press, 2012, 233--243.
18. Xing, Z. and Stroulia, E. Refactoring practice: How it is and how it should be supported (an Eclipse case study). In Proceedings of the 22^nd International Conference on Software Maintenance (Philadelphia, PA). IEEE Press, 2006, 458--468.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

• Computer systems organization

• Software and its engineering

  • Software creation and management