skip to main content
research-article

Activity Recognition for Quality Assessment of Batting Shots in Cricket using a Hierarchical Representation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Quality assessment in cricket is a complex task that is performed by understanding the combination of individual activities a player is able to perform and by assessing how well these activities are performed. We present a framework for inexpensive and accessible, automated recognition of cricketing shots. By means of body-worn inertial measurement units, movements of batsmen are recorded, which are then analysed using a parallelised, hierarchical recognition system that automatically classifies relevant categories of shots as required for assessing batting quality. Our system then generates meaningful visualisations of key performance parameters, including feet positions, attack/defence, and distribution of shots around the ground. These visualisations are the basis for objective skill assessment thereby focusing on specific personal improvement points as identified through our system. We evaluated our framework through a deployment study where 6 players engaged in batting exercises. Based on the recorded movement data we could automatically identify 20 classes of unique batting shot components with an average F1-score greater than 88%. This analysis is the basis for our detailed analysis of our study participants’ skills. Our system has the potential to rival expensive vision-based systems but at a fraction of the cost.

References

  1. Mark Albert, Santiago Toledo, Mark Shapiro, and Konrad Koerding. 2012. Using Mobile Phones for Activity Recognition in ParkinsonâĂŹs Patients. Frontiers in Neurology 3 (2012), 158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. I. Almajai, F. Yan, T. de Campos, A. Khan, W. Christmas, D. Windridge, and J. Kittler. 2012. Anomaly Detection and Knowledge Transfer in Automatic Sports Video Annotation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 109--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. American Appraisal. 2015. ON A STICKY WICKET; A Concise Report on brand values in the Indian Premier League. (2015). http://american-appraisal.in/AA-Files/Images_IN/PDF/BrandValuesIPL_April2015.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Axivity. 2015. WAX9 - 9-Axis Bluetooth Streaming IMU. (2015). http://axivity.com/files/resources/WAX9_Data_Sheet.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marc Bächlin, Kilian Förster, and Gerhard Tröster. 2009. SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A Busch and D James. 2007. Analysis of cricket shots using inertial sensors. The impact of technology on sport II (2007), 317--322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cricket Kenya. 2015. (2015). http://cricketkenya.co.ke/structure.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T E deCampos, A Khan, F Yan, N FarajiDavar, D Windridge, J Kittler, and W Christmas. 2013. A framework for automatic sports video annotation with anomaly detection and transfer learning. In Machine Learning and Cognitive Science, collocated with EUCOGIII.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davide Figo, Pedro C. Diniz, Diogo R. Ferreira, and João M. P. Cardoso. 2010. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 7 (mar 2010), 645--662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. S. Gayathri, Susan Elias, and Balaraman Ravindran. 2015. Hierarchical activity recognition for dementia care using Markov Logic Network. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 2 (2015), 271--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Benjamin H Groh, Martin Fleckenstein, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2016. Wearable trick classification in freestyle snowboarding. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 89--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Benjamin H Groh, Thomas Kautz, Dominik Schuldhaus, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2015. IMU-based trick classification in skateboarding. In KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Hammerla, R. Kirkham, P. Andras, and T. Plötz. 2013. On Preserving Statistical Characteristics of Accelerometry Data using their Empirical Cumulative Distribution. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nils Y. Hammerla, James M. Fisher, Peter Andras, Lynn Rochester, Richard Walker, and Thomas Plotz. 2015. PD Disease State Assessment in Naturalistic Environments Using Deep Learning. In Proc. AAAI. AAAI Press, 1742--1748. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2886521.2886562 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nils Y. Hammerla and Thomas Plötz. 2015. Let’s (Not) Stick Together: Pairwise Similarity Biases Cross-validation in Activity Recognition. In Proc. Ubicomp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Thomas Holleczek, Jona Schoch, Bert Arnrich, and Gerhard Tröster. 2010. Recognizing turns and other snowboarding activities with a gyroscope. In Wearable Computers (ISWC), 2010 International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ulf Jensen, Frank A. Dassler, Marcus Schmidt, Markus Hennig, Thomas Jaitner, and Björn Eskofier. 2014. A Mobile System to Investigate Putting Kinematics in Motor Learning. In Book of Abstracts of the 19th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, A. De Haan, C. J. De Ruiter, and E. Tsolakidis (Eds.). 207--208. https://www5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Forschung/Publikationen/2014/Jensen14-AMS.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D Karmaker, AZME Chowdhury, MSU Miah, MA Imran, and MH Rahman. 2015. Cricket shot classification using motion vector. In Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCTIM), 2015 Second International Conference on. IEEE, 125--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Thomas Kautz, Benjamin Groh, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2015. Sensor fusion for multi-player activity recognition in game-sports. In Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics, 21st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Daniel Kelly, Garrett F Coughlan, Brian S Green, and Brian Caulfield. 2012. Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device. Sports Engineering 15, 2 (2012), 81--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Elisabeth A Kensinger. 2011. What we remember (and forget) about positive and negative experiences. Psychological Science Agenda 1 (2011), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Aftab Khan, Eugen Berlin, Sebastian Mellor, Robin Thompson, Nils Hammerla, Roisin McNaney, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2016. How Did I Do?: Automatic Skill Assessment from Activity Data. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. 19, 4 (March 2016), 18--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Aftab Khan, Nils Hammerla, Sebastian Mellor, and Thomas PlÃűtz. 2016. Optimising sampling rates for accelerometer-based human activity recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 73 (2016), 33 -- 40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aftab Khan, Sebastian Mellor, Eugen Berlin, Robin Thompson, Roisin McNaney, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2015. Beyond Activity Recognition: Skill Assessment from Accelerometer Data. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Aftab Khan, James Nicholson, Sebastian Mellor, Daniel Jackson, Karim Ladha, Cassim Ladha, Jon Hand, Joseph Clarke, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2014. Occupancy Monitoring Using Environmental 8 Context Sensors and a Hierarchical Analysis Framework. In Proc. BuildSys. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Khan, D. Windridge, and J. Kittler. 2014. Multilevel Chinese Takeaway Process and Label-Based Processes for Rule Induction in the Context of Automated Sports Video Annotation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 44, 10 (Oct 2014), 1910--1923.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Cassim Ladha, Nils Hammerla, Emma Hughs, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Ploetz. 2013. Dog’s Life: Wearable Activity Recognition for Dogs. In Proc. Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Comp. (UbiComp). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Cassim Ladha, Nils Y Hammerla, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2013. ClimbAX: skill assessment for climbing enthusiasts. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Laghate, GauravSharma, Ravi Teja. 2016. (2016). http://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/advertising/ipl-brand-valuation-soars-to-4-16-billion-duff-phelps/articleshow/52930766.cmsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mallett, Ashley. 2012. (2012). http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/597862.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. David Minnen, Tracy Westeyn, Thad Starner, J Ward, and Paul Lukowicz. 2006. Performance metrics and evaluation issues for continuous activity recognition. Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems 4 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Andreas Möller, Luis Roalter, Stefan Diewald, Johannes Scherr, Matthias Kranz, Nils Hammerla, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2012. Gymskill: A personal trainer for physical exercises. In Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 213--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Raúl Montoliu, Raúl Martín-Félez, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, and Adolfo Martínez-Usó. 2015. Team activity recognition in Association Football using a Bag-of-Words-based method. Human Movement Science 41 (2015), 165 -- 178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Dan Morris, T Scott Saponas, Andrew Guillory, and Ilya Kelner. 2014. RecoFit: using a wearable sensor to find, recognize, and count repetitive exercises. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3225--3234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. MotionView. 2017. (2017). http://www.baseballcoachsystems.com/video-analysis-software-intro.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Muir, Hugh. 2015. (2015). https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/13/england-cricket-problem-non-white-asianGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Nations Encyclopedia. 2017. (2017). http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Africa/Kenya-INFRASTRUCTURE-POWER-AND-COMMUNICATIONS.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Le Nguyen Ngu Nguyen, Daniel Rodríguez-Martín, Andreu Català, Carlos Pérez-López, Albert Samà, and Andrea Cavallaro. 2015. Basketball Activity Recognition Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units. In Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción). ACM, 60:1--60:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Hamed Pirsiavash and Deva Ramanan. 2012. Detecting activities of daily living in first-person camera views. In Proc. CVPR. IEEE, 2847--2854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Thomas Ploetz, Nils Hammerla, and Patrick Olivier. 2011. Feature Learning for Activity Recognition in Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Art. Intelligence (IJCAI). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Thomas Plötz, Chen Chen, Nils Y. Hammerla, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2012. Automatic Synchronization of Wearable Sensors and Video-Cameras for Ground Truth Annotation -- A Practical Approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 16th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) (ISWC ’12). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 100--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Attila Reiss and Didier Stricker. 2012. Introducing a New Benchmarked Dataset for Activity Monitoring. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Bernhard Schölkopf and Alexander J. Smola. 2001. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Priya Singh. 2014. MYCA -- Batting Skills. Missouri Youth Cricket Association. http://www.mocricket.org/materials/myca_batting_skills.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Sporteology. 2016. Top 10 Most Popular Sports in The World. (2016). http://sporteology.com/top-10-popular-sports-world/7/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Stephen S Intille, and Kent Larson. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 158--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Wangalwa, Elyane. 2014. (2014). http://www.cnbcafrica.com/news/east-africa/2014/09/09/kenya-leads-internet/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Juanita R Weissensteiner, Bruce Abernethy, and Damian Farrow. 2011. Hitting a cricket ball: what components of the interceptive action are most linked to expertise? Sports Biomechanics 10, 4 (2011), 324--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Activity Recognition for Quality Assessment of Batting Shots in Cricket using a Hierarchical Representation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 3
          September 2017
          2023 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3139486
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 September 2017
          • Accepted: 1 September 2017
          • Revised: 1 May 2017
          • Received: 1 February 2017
          Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader