Abstract
Quality assessment in cricket is a complex task that is performed by understanding the combination of individual activities a player is able to perform and by assessing how well these activities are performed. We present a framework for inexpensive and accessible, automated recognition of cricketing shots. By means of body-worn inertial measurement units, movements of batsmen are recorded, which are then analysed using a parallelised, hierarchical recognition system that automatically classifies relevant categories of shots as required for assessing batting quality. Our system then generates meaningful visualisations of key performance parameters, including feet positions, attack/defence, and distribution of shots around the ground. These visualisations are the basis for objective skill assessment thereby focusing on specific personal improvement points as identified through our system. We evaluated our framework through a deployment study where 6 players engaged in batting exercises. Based on the recorded movement data we could automatically identify 20 classes of unique batting shot components with an average F1-score greater than 88%. This analysis is the basis for our detailed analysis of our study participants’ skills. Our system has the potential to rival expensive vision-based systems but at a fraction of the cost.
- Mark Albert, Santiago Toledo, Mark Shapiro, and Konrad Koerding. 2012. Using Mobile Phones for Activity Recognition in ParkinsonâĂŹs Patients. Frontiers in Neurology 3 (2012), 158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Almajai, F. Yan, T. de Campos, A. Khan, W. Christmas, D. Windridge, and J. Kittler. 2012. Anomaly Detection and Knowledge Transfer in Automatic Sports Video Annotation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 109--117.Google Scholar
- American Appraisal. 2015. ON A STICKY WICKET; A Concise Report on brand values in the Indian Premier League. (2015). http://american-appraisal.in/AA-Files/Images_IN/PDF/BrandValuesIPL_April2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Axivity. 2015. WAX9 - 9-Axis Bluetooth Streaming IMU. (2015). http://axivity.com/files/resources/WAX9_Data_Sheet.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Marc Bächlin, Kilian Förster, and Gerhard Tröster. 2009. SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A Busch and D James. 2007. Analysis of cricket shots using inertial sensors. The impact of technology on sport II (2007), 317--322.Google Scholar
- Cricket Kenya. 2015. (2015). http://cricketkenya.co.ke/structure.phpGoogle Scholar
- T E deCampos, A Khan, F Yan, N FarajiDavar, D Windridge, J Kittler, and W Christmas. 2013. A framework for automatic sports video annotation with anomaly detection and transfer learning. In Machine Learning and Cognitive Science, collocated with EUCOGIII.Google Scholar
- Davide Figo, Pedro C. Diniz, Diogo R. Ferreira, and João M. P. Cardoso. 2010. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 7 (mar 2010), 645--662. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. S. Gayathri, Susan Elias, and Balaraman Ravindran. 2015. Hierarchical activity recognition for dementia care using Markov Logic Network. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 2 (2015), 271--285. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin H Groh, Martin Fleckenstein, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2016. Wearable trick classification in freestyle snowboarding. In Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 89--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin H Groh, Thomas Kautz, Dominik Schuldhaus, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2015. IMU-based trick classification in skateboarding. In KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google Scholar
- N. Hammerla, R. Kirkham, P. Andras, and T. Plötz. 2013. On Preserving Statistical Characteristics of Accelerometry Data using their Empirical Cumulative Distribution. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nils Y. Hammerla, James M. Fisher, Peter Andras, Lynn Rochester, Richard Walker, and Thomas Plotz. 2015. PD Disease State Assessment in Naturalistic Environments Using Deep Learning. In Proc. AAAI. AAAI Press, 1742--1748. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2886521.2886562 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nils Y. Hammerla and Thomas Plötz. 2015. Let’s (Not) Stick Together: Pairwise Similarity Biases Cross-validation in Activity Recognition. In Proc. Ubicomp. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Holleczek, Jona Schoch, Bert Arnrich, and Gerhard Tröster. 2010. Recognizing turns and other snowboarding activities with a gyroscope. In Wearable Computers (ISWC), 2010 International Symposium on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ulf Jensen, Frank A. Dassler, Marcus Schmidt, Markus Hennig, Thomas Jaitner, and Björn Eskofier. 2014. A Mobile System to Investigate Putting Kinematics in Motor Learning. In Book of Abstracts of the 19th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, A. De Haan, C. J. De Ruiter, and E. Tsolakidis (Eds.). 207--208. https://www5.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Forschung/Publikationen/2014/Jensen14-AMS.pdfGoogle Scholar
- D Karmaker, AZME Chowdhury, MSU Miah, MA Imran, and MH Rahman. 2015. Cricket shot classification using motion vector. In Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCTIM), 2015 Second International Conference on. IEEE, 125--129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Kautz, Benjamin Groh, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2015. Sensor fusion for multi-player activity recognition in game-sports. In Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics, 21st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Google Scholar
- Daniel Kelly, Garrett F Coughlan, Brian S Green, and Brian Caulfield. 2012. Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device. Sports Engineering 15, 2 (2012), 81--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elisabeth A Kensinger. 2011. What we remember (and forget) about positive and negative experiences. Psychological Science Agenda 1 (2011), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Aftab Khan, Eugen Berlin, Sebastian Mellor, Robin Thompson, Nils Hammerla, Roisin McNaney, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2016. How Did I Do?: Automatic Skill Assessment from Activity Data. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. 19, 4 (March 2016), 18--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aftab Khan, Nils Hammerla, Sebastian Mellor, and Thomas PlÃűtz. 2016. Optimising sampling rates for accelerometer-based human activity recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 73 (2016), 33 -- 40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aftab Khan, Sebastian Mellor, Eugen Berlin, Robin Thompson, Roisin McNaney, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2015. Beyond Activity Recognition: Skill Assessment from Accelerometer Data. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aftab Khan, James Nicholson, Sebastian Mellor, Daniel Jackson, Karim Ladha, Cassim Ladha, Jon Hand, Joseph Clarke, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2014. Occupancy Monitoring Using Environmental 8 Context Sensors and a Hierarchical Analysis Framework. In Proc. BuildSys. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Khan, D. Windridge, and J. Kittler. 2014. Multilevel Chinese Takeaway Process and Label-Based Processes for Rule Induction in the Context of Automated Sports Video Annotation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 44, 10 (Oct 2014), 1910--1923.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cassim Ladha, Nils Hammerla, Emma Hughs, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Ploetz. 2013. Dog’s Life: Wearable Activity Recognition for Dogs. In Proc. Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Comp. (UbiComp). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cassim Ladha, Nils Y Hammerla, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2013. ClimbAX: skill assessment for climbing enthusiasts. In Proc. UbiComp. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laghate, GauravSharma, Ravi Teja. 2016. (2016). http://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/advertising/ipl-brand-valuation-soars-to-4-16-billion-duff-phelps/articleshow/52930766.cmsGoogle Scholar
- Mallett, Ashley. 2012. (2012). http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/597862.htmlGoogle Scholar
- David Minnen, Tracy Westeyn, Thad Starner, J Ward, and Paul Lukowicz. 2006. Performance metrics and evaluation issues for continuous activity recognition. Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems 4 (2006).Google Scholar
- Andreas Möller, Luis Roalter, Stefan Diewald, Johannes Scherr, Matthias Kranz, Nils Hammerla, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2012. Gymskill: A personal trainer for physical exercises. In Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 213--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raúl Montoliu, Raúl Martín-Félez, Joaquín Torres-Sospedra, and Adolfo Martínez-Usó. 2015. Team activity recognition in Association Football using a Bag-of-Words-based method. Human Movement Science 41 (2015), 165 -- 178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Morris, T Scott Saponas, Andrew Guillory, and Ilya Kelner. 2014. RecoFit: using a wearable sensor to find, recognize, and count repetitive exercises. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3225--3234. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MotionView. 2017. (2017). http://www.baseballcoachsystems.com/video-analysis-software-intro.phpGoogle Scholar
- Muir, Hugh. 2015. (2015). https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/13/england-cricket-problem-non-white-asianGoogle Scholar
- Nations Encyclopedia. 2017. (2017). http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Africa/Kenya-INFRASTRUCTURE-POWER-AND-COMMUNICATIONS.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Le Nguyen Ngu Nguyen, Daniel Rodríguez-Martín, Andreu Català, Carlos Pérez-López, Albert Samà, and Andrea Cavallaro. 2015. Basketball Activity Recognition Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units. In Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción). ACM, 60:1--60:6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hamed Pirsiavash and Deva Ramanan. 2012. Detecting activities of daily living in first-person camera views. In Proc. CVPR. IEEE, 2847--2854. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Ploetz, Nils Hammerla, and Patrick Olivier. 2011. Feature Learning for Activity Recognition in Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Art. Intelligence (IJCAI). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Plötz, Chen Chen, Nils Y. Hammerla, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2012. Automatic Synchronization of Wearable Sensors and Video-Cameras for Ground Truth Annotation -- A Practical Approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 16th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) (ISWC ’12). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 100--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Attila Reiss and Didier Stricker. 2012. Introducing a New Benchmarked Dataset for Activity Monitoring. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernhard Schölkopf and Alexander J. Smola. 2001. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Priya Singh. 2014. MYCA -- Batting Skills. Missouri Youth Cricket Association. http://www.mocricket.org/materials/myca_batting_skills.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Sporteology. 2016. Top 10 Most Popular Sports in The World. (2016). http://sporteology.com/top-10-popular-sports-world/7/Google Scholar
- Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, Stephen S Intille, and Kent Larson. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 158--175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wangalwa, Elyane. 2014. (2014). http://www.cnbcafrica.com/news/east-africa/2014/09/09/kenya-leads-internet/Google Scholar
- Juanita R Weissensteiner, Bruce Abernethy, and Damian Farrow. 2011. Hitting a cricket ball: what components of the interceptive action are most linked to expertise? Sports Biomechanics 10, 4 (2011), 324--338.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Activity Recognition for Quality Assessment of Batting Shots in Cricket using a Hierarchical Representation
Recommendations
Using Wrist-Worn Activity Recognition for Basketball Game Analysis
iWOAR '18: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and InteractionGame play in the sport of basketball tends to combine highly dynamic phases in which the teams strategically move across the field, with specific actions made by individual players. Analysis of basketball games usually focuses on the locations of ...
Basketball Activity Recognition using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units
Interacción '15: Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer InteractionThe analysis and evaluation of human movement is a growing research area within the field of sports monitoring. This analysis can help support the enhancement of an athlete's performance, the prediction of injuries or the optimization of training ...
A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors
The last 20 years have seen ever-increasing research activity in the field of human activity recognition. With activity recognition having considerably matured, so has the number of challenges in designing, implementing, and evaluating activity ...
Comments