skip to main content
10.1145/3123266.3127908acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do Individuals Smile More in Diverse Social Company?: Studying Smiles and Diversity Via Social Media Photos

Published:23 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Photographs are one of the most fundamental ways for human beings to capture their social experiences and smiling is one of the most common actions associated with photo-taking. Photos, thus provide a unique opportunity to study the phenomena of mixing of different people and also the smiles expressed by individuals in these social settings. In this work, we study whether a social media-based computational framework can be employed to obtain smile and diversity scores at very fine, individual relationship resolution, and study their associations. We analyze two data sets from different social networks, Twitter and Instagram, over different time periods. Primarily looking at photographs, using computer vision APIs, we capture the diversity of social interactions in terms of age, gender, and race of those present, and smile levels. Analysis of both data sets suggest similar and significant findings: (a) people, in general, tend to smile more in the presence of others; and (b) people tend to smile more in a more diverse company. The results can help scale, test, and validate multiple theories related to affect and diversity in sociology, psychology, biology, and urban planning, and inform future mechanisms for encouraging people to smile more often in everyday settings

References

  1. Saeed Abdullah, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Jean M.R. Costa, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. Collective Smile: Measuring Societal Happiness from Geolocated Images Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 361--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ernest L Abel and Michael L Kruger. 2010. Smile intensity in photographs predicts longevity. Psychological Science Vol. 21, 4 (2010), 542--544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. MILLICENT H Abel and REBECCA Hester. 2002. The therapeutic effects of smiling. an empirical reflection on the smile. Mellen Stud in Psychol Vol. 4 (2002), 217--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Muhammad Adnan, Guy Lansley, and Paul A Longley. 2013. A geodemographic analysis of the ethnicity and identity of Twitter users in Greater London Proceedings of the 21st Conference on GIS Research UK (GISRUK). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michela Arnaboldi, Marco Brambilla, Beatrice Cassottana, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Davide Ripamonti, Simone Vantini, and Riccardo Volonterio. 2016. Studying Multicultural Diversity of Cities and Neighborhoods through Social Media Language Detection. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Saeideh Bakhshi, David A Shamma, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram Proc. ACM CHI. ACM, 965--974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lisa Feldman Barrett, Lucy Robin, Paula R Pietromonaco, and Kristen M Eyssell. 1998. Are women the "more emotional" sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 12, 4 (1998), 555--578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Johan Bollen, Huina Mao, and Alberto Pepe. 2011. Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. ICWSM Vol. 11 (2011), 450--453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leslie R Brody and Judith A Hall. 2010. Gender, emotion, and socialization. Handbook of gender research in psychology. Springer, 429--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Luigino Bruni. 2007. Handbook on the Economics of Happiness. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregorio Caetano and Vikram Maheshri. 2015. Homophily and Sorting Within Neighborhoods. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James A Davis. 1984. New money, and old man/lady and "Two's company": Subjective Welfare in the NORC General Social Surveys, 1972--1982. Social indicators research Vol. 15, 4 (1984), 319--350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, and Scott Counts. 2012. Happy, nervous or surprised? classification of human affective states in social media Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Francine M Deutsch. 1990. Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of role on smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol. 16, 3 (1990), 531--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Abhinav Dhall, Jyoti Joshi, Karan Sikka, Roland Goecke, and Nicu Sebe. 2015. The more the merrier: Analysing the affect of a group of people in images Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, Vol. Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamdi Dibeklioglu, Roberto Valenti, Albert Ali Salah, and Theo Gevers. 2010. Eyes do not lie: Spontaneous versus posed smiles. Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 703--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. John F Dovidio, Michelle Hebl, Jennifer A Richeson, and J Nicole Shelton. 2006. Nonverbal communication, race, and intergroup interaction. The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (2006), 481--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Richard A Easterlin. 2001. Life cycle welfare: trends and differences. Journal of happiness studies Vol. 2, 1 (2001), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Christopher G Ellison. 1990. Family ties, friendships, and subjective well-being among Black Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family (1990), 298--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicole B Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New media & society, Vol. 13, 6 (2011), 873--892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicole B Ellison, Jessica Vitak, Rebecca Gray, and Cliff Lampe. 2014. Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Vol. 19, 4 (2014), 855--870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. 2014. Mapbox. (2014). Online: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything-we-know-about-facebooks-secret-mood-manipulation-experiment/373648/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Eric Fischer. 2014. Mapbox. (2014). Online: https://www.mapbox.com/bites/00245/locals/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 80, S1 (2016), 298--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Alan J Fridlund. 2014. Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Samuel L Gaertner and John F Dovidio. 1986. The aversive form of racism. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jim Giles. 2012. Making the links. Nature, Vol. 488, 7412 (2012), 448--450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. LeeAnne Harker and Dacher Keltner. 2001. Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 80, 1 (2001), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Marvin A Hecht and Marianne LaFrance. 1998. License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol. 24, 12 (1998), 1332--1342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. John F Helliwell, Robert D Putnam, and others. 2004. The social context of well-being. Philosophical transactions-royal society of London series B biological sciences (2004), 1435--1446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Javier Hernandez, Mohammed Ehsan Hoque, Will Drevo, and Rosalind W Picard. 2012. Mood meter: counting smiles in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 301--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Matthew J Hertenstein, Carrie A Hansel, Alissa M Butts, and Sarah N Hile. 2009. Smile intensity in photographs predicts divorce later in life. Motivation and Emotion Vol. 33, 2 (2009), 99--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ursula Hess and Patrick Bourgeois. 2010. You smile--I smile: Emotion expression in social interaction. Biological psychology Vol. 84, 3 (2010), 514--520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. J Hillier and P Healy. 2008. Vol. 2: Political economy, diversity and pragmatism. Aldershot {etc.}: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Michael A Hogg and Dominic Abrams. 2007. Social cognition and attitudes. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael Hughes and Melvin E Thomas. 1998. The continuing significance of race revisited: A study of race, class, and quality of life in America, 1972 to 1996. American Sociological Review (1998), 785--795.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Clayton J Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Carol Nagy Jacklin and Eleanor E Maccoby. 1978. Social behavior at thirty-three months in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads. Child Development (1978), 557--569.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Eric Jaffe. 2010. The Psychological Study of Smiling. (2010). Online: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-psychological-study-of-smiling.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Adam DI Kramer, Jamie E Guillory, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, 24 (2014), 8788--8790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Marianne LaFrance, Marvin A Hecht, and Elizabeth Levy Paluck. 2003. The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological bulletin Vol. 129, 2 (2003), 305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. JS Lockard, CE Fahrenbruch, JL Smith, and CJ Morgan. 1977. Smiling and laughter: Different phyletic origins? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol. 10, 3 (1977), 183--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Eleanor E Maccoby. 1990. Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American psychologist Vol. 45, 4 (1990), 513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Michael T Maly. 2000. The neighborhood diversity index: a complementary measure of racial residential settlement. Journal of Urban Affairs Vol. 22, 1 (2000), 37--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Carol T Miller and Anna M Myers. 1998. Compensating for prejudice: How heavyweight people (and others) control outcomes despite prejudice. (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Myriam D Munezero, Calkin Suero Montero, Erkki Sutinen, and John Pajunen. 2014. Are they different? affect, feeling, emotion, sentiment, and opinion detection in text. IEEE transactions on affective computing Vol. 5, 2 (2014), 101--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Christopher Oveis, June Gruber, Dacher Keltner, Juliet L Stamper, and W Thomas Boyce. 2009. Smile intensity and warm touch as thin slices of child and family affective style. Emotion, Vol. 9, 4 (2009), 544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. S Page. 2007. Diversity Powers Innovation. (2007). Online: https://www.americanprogress.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosalind W Picard. 1997. Affective computing. Vol. Vol. 252. MIT press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Robert R Provine. 1992. Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol. 30, 1 (1992), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Robert R Provine. 1997. Yawns, laughs, smiles, tickles, and talking: Naturalistic and laboratory studies of facial action and social communication. The psychology of facial expression (1997), 158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Darshan Santani and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2013. Speaking swiss: languages and venues in foursquare Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 501--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Mark Schilling. 2002. Measuring diversity in the United States. Math Horizons, Vol. 9, 4 (2002), 29--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Karen L Schmidt, Jeffrey F Cohn, and Yingli Tian. 2003. Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: Automatic movement in solitary and social smiles. Biological Psychology Vol. 65, 1 (2003), 49--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. J Patrick Seder and Shigehiro Oishi. 2012. Intensity of smiling in Facebook photos predicts future life satisfaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 3, 4 (2012), 407--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Andrew Perrin Shannon Greenwood and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social Media Update 2016. (2016). Online: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. J Nicole Shelton, Jennifer A Richeson, and Jessica Salvatore. 2005. Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol. 31, 9 (2005), 1189--1202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Dov Shmotkin. 1990. Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social indicators research Vol. 23, 3 (1990), 201--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jim Sidanius and Felicia Pratto. 2001. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Jennifer S Silk, Erika E Forbes, Diana J Whalen, Jennifer L Jakubcak, Wesley K Thompson, Neal D Ryan, David A Axelson, Boris Birmaher, and Ronald E Dahl. 2011. Daily emotional dynamics in depressed youth: A cell phone ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of experimental child psychology Vol. 110, 2 (2011), 241--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Vivek Singh, Saket Hegde, and Akanksha Atrey. 2017. Towards Measuring Fine-Grained Diversity Using Social Media Photographs International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. AAAI, 668--671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. @smfrogers. 2014. What Fuels a Tweet's Engagement? (2014). Online: https://blog.twitter.com/2014/what-fuels-a-tweets-engagement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Walter G Stephan and Cookie White Stephan. 1985. Intergroup anxiety. Journal of social issues Vol. 41, 3 (1985), 157--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Mark Turner, Steve Love, and Mark Howell. 2008. Understanding emotions experienced when using a mobile phone in public: The social usability of mobile (cellular) telephones. Telematics and Informatics Vol. 25, 3 (2008), 201--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Nancy Van House, Marc Davis, Morgan Ames, Megan Finn, and Vijay Viswanathan. 2005. The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1853--1856. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Gary R VandenBos. 2007. APA dictionary of psychology.American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Yu Wang, Yuncheng Li, and Jiebo Luo. 2016. Deciphering the 2016 US Presidential campaign in the Twitter sphere: A comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.03097 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang Yang. 2008. Social Inequalities in Happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. American Sociological Review Vol. 73, 2 (2008), 204--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Jianbo Yuan, Quanzeng You, and Jiebo Luo. 2015. Sentiment Analysis Using Social Multimedia. Multimedia Data Mining and Analytics. Springer, 31--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do Individuals Smile More in Diverse Social Company?: Studying Smiles and Diversity Via Social Media Photos

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia
          October 2017
          2028 pages
          ISBN:9781450349062
          DOI:10.1145/3123266

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate189of684submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader