ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution simulation of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, including non-linear frictional failure on a megathrustsplay fault system. Our method exploits unstructured meshes capturing the complicated geometries in subduction zones that are crucial to understand large earthquakes and tsunami generation. These up-to-date largest and longest dynamic rupture simulations enable analysis of dynamic source effects on the seafloor displacements.
To tackle the extreme size of this scenario an end-to-end optimization of the simulation code SeisSol was necessary. We implemented a new cache-aware wave propagation scheme and optimized the dynamic rupture kernels using code generation. We established a novel clustered local-time-stepping scheme for dynamic rupture. In total, we achieved a speed-up of 13.6 compared to the previous implementation. For the Sumatra scenario with 221 million elements this reduced the time-to-solution to 13.9 hours on 86, 016 Haswell cores. Furthermore, we used asynchronous output to overlap I/O and compute time.
- C. J. Ammon, C. Ji, H.-K. Thio, D. Robinson, S. Ni, V. Hjorleifsdottir, H. Kanamori, T. Lay, S. Das, D. Helmberger, G. Ichinose, J. Polet, and D. J. Wald. 2005. Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. Science 308, 5725 (2005), 1133--1139.Google Scholar
- J.-P. Ampuero and Y. Ben-Zion. 2008. Cracks, pulses and macroscopic asymmetry of dynamic rupture on a bimaterial interface with velocity-weakening friction. Geophys. J. Int. 173, 2 (2008), 674--692.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. J. Andrews. 1999. Test of two methods for faulting on finite-difference calculations. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89, 4 (1999), 931--937.Google Scholar
- D. J. Andrews. 2005. Rupture dynamics with energy loss outside the slip zone. J. Geophy. Res. 110, 1 (2005), 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. J. Andrews, T. C. Hanks, and J. W. Whitney. 2007. Physical limits on ground motion at Yucca Mountain. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 6 (2007), 1771--1792.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Aochi and R. Madariaga. 2003. The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, Earthquake: Nonplanar Fault Structure, Dynamic Rupture Process, and Strong Ground Motion. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 3 (2003), 1249--1266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Aochi, R. Madariaga, and E. Fukuyama. 2003. Constraint of fault parameters inferred from nonplanar fault modeling. Geochem. Geophys. 4, 2 (2003). 1020.Google Scholar
- P. Audet, M. G. Bostock, N. I. Christensen, and S. M. Peacock. 2009. Seismic evidence for overpressured subducted oceanic crust and megathrust fault sealing. Nature 457, 7225 (2009), 76--78.Google Scholar
- M. Barall. 2009. A grid-doubling finite-element technique for calculating dynamic three-dimensional spontaneous rupture on an earthquake fault. Geophys. J. Int. 178 (2009), 845--859.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Barall and R. A. Harris. 2014. Metrics for Comparing Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Simulations. Seismol. Res. Lett. 86, 1 (Nov. 2014), 223--235.Google Scholar
- G. I. Barenblatt. 1962. The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics 7 (1962), 55--129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Q. Bletery, A. Sladen, J. Jiang, and M. Simons. 2016. A Bayesian source model for the 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth 121, 7 (2016), 5116--5135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Breuer, A. Heinecke, and M. Bader. 2016. Petascale Local Time Stepping for the ADER-DG Finite Element Method. In 2016 IEEE Int. Parallel and Distrib. Process. Symp. (IPDPS). 854--863.Google Scholar
- A. Breuer, A. Heinecke, S. Rettenberger, M. Bader, A.-A. Gabriel, and C. Pelties. 2014. Sustained Petascale Performance of Seismic Simulations with SeisSol on SuperMUC. In Supercomputing: 29th Int. Conf. Springer, 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Burstedde, O. Ghattas, M. Gurnis, T. Isaac, G. Stadler, T. Warburton, and L. Wilcox. 2010. Extreme-Scale AMR. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. (SC '10). IEEE Computer Society, 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. P. S. Chauhan, S. C. Singh, N. D. Hananto, H. Carton, F. Klingelhoefer, J.-X. Dessa, H. Permana, N. J. White, and D. Graindorge. 2009. Seismic imaging of forearc backthrusts at northern Sumatra subduction zone. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 3 (Dec. 2009), 1772--1780.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics. 2017. SPECFEM3D Cartesian. www.geodynamics.org/cig/software/specfem3d/. (2017).Google Scholar
- Y. Cui, E. Poyraz, K. B. Olsen, J. Zhou, K. Withers, S. Callaghan, J. Larkin, C. Guest, D. Choi, A. Chourasia, and others. 2013. Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. ACM, 70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. A. Dalguer and S. M. Day. 2007. Staggered-grid split-node method for spontaneous rupture simulation. J. Geophy. Res. 112, 2 (2007), 1--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. A. Dalguer, K. Irikura, J. D. Riera, and H. C. Chiu. 2001. The importance of the dynamic source effects on strong ground motion during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: Brief interpretation of the damage distribution on buildings. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 5 (2001), 1112--1127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. M. Day, L. A. Dalguer, N. Lapusta, and Y. Liu. 2005. Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture. J. Geophy. Res. 110 (2005), 1--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. de la Puente, J.-P. Ampuero, and M. Käser. 2009. Dynamic rupture modeling on unstructured meshes using a discontinuous Galerkin method. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth 114, B10 (2009). B10302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. DeDontney, J. R. Rice, and R. Dmowska. 2012. Finite Element Modeling of Branched Ruptures Including Off-Fault Plasticity. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 102, 2 (2012), 541--562.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Duan. 2012. Dynamic rupture of the 2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: Roles of a possible subducting seamount. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth 117, B5 (2012). B05311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Duan and S. M. Day. 2008. Inelastic strain distribution and seismic radiation from rupture of a fault kink. J. Geophy. Res. 113, B12 (Dec. 2008), B12311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Dumbser and M. Käser. 2006. An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes - II. The three-dimensional isotropic case. Geophys. J. Int. 167 (2006), 319--336.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Dumbser, M. Käser, and E. F. Toro. 2007. An arbitrary high-order Discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes V: Local time steppingan p-adaptivity. Geophys. J. Int. 171, 2 (2007), 695--717.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Dumbser and C.-D. Munz. 2005. Arbitrary high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes. Numerical methods for hyperbolic and kinetic problems (2005), 295--333.Google Scholar
- E. M. Dunham. 2007. Conditions governing the occurrence of supershear ruptures under slip-weakening friction. Geophys. J. Int. 112, B7 (2007), 1--24.Google Scholar
- G. P. Ely, S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster. 2010. Dynamic rupture models for the southern San Andreas fault. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 1 (2010), 131--150.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Frings, F. Wolf, and V. Petkov. 2009. Scalable Massively Parallel I/O to Task-local Files. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. (SC '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A.-A. Gabriel, J.-P. Ampuero, L. A. Dalguer, and P. M. Mai. 2012. The Transition of Dynamic Rupture Modes in Elastic Media Under Velocity-Weakening Friction. J. Geophy. Res. 117, B9 (2012), 0148--0227.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.-A. Gabriel, J.-P. Ampuero, L. A. Dalguer, and P. M. Mai. 2013. Source Properties of Dynamic Rupture Pulses with Off-Fault Plasticity. J. Geophy. Res. (2013).Google Scholar
- P. Galvez, J.-P. Ampuero, L. A. Dalguer, S. N. Somala, and T. Nissen-Meyer. 2014. Dynamic earthquake rupture modelled with an unstructured 3-D spectral element method applied to the 2011 M9 Tohoku earthquake. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 2 (2014), 1222--1240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Galvez, L. A. Dalguer, J.-P. Ampuero, and D. Giardini. 2016. Rupture Reactivation during the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku Earthquake: Dynamic Rupture and Ground-Motion Simulations. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106, 3 (2016), 819--831.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Geuzaine and J. F. Remacle. 2009. Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 79, 11 (2009), 1309--1331.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. L. Hardebeck. 2015. Stress orientations in subduction zones and the strength of subduction megathrust faults. Science 349, 6253 (Sept. 2015), 1213--1216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. A. Harris, M. Barall, D. J. Andrews, B. Duan, S. Ma, E. M. Dunham, A.-A. Gabriel, Y. Kaneko, Y. Kase, B. T. Aagaard, D. D. Oglesby, J.-P. Ampuero, T. C. Hanks, and N. Abrahamson. 2011. Verifying a Computational Method for Predicting Extreme Ground Motion. Seismol. Res. Lett. 82, 5 (2011), 638--644.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. A. Harris, M. Barall, R. J. Archuleta, E. M. Dunham, B. T. Aagaard, J.-P. Ampuero, H. Bhat, V. Cruz-Atienza, L. A. Dalguer, P. Dawson, S. M. Day, B. Duan, G. P. Ely, Y. Kaneko, Y. Kase, N. Lapusta, Y. Liu, S. Ma, D. D. Oglesby, K. B. Olsen, A. Pitarka, S. Song, and E. Templeton. 2009. The SCEC/USGS Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Code Verification Exercise. Seismol. Res. Lett. 80, 1 (2009), 119--126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. A. Harris and S. M. Day. 1999. Dynamic 3D simulations of earthquakes on en echelon faults. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 14 (1999), 2089--2092.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. P. Hayes, D. J. Wald, and R. L. Johnson. 2012. Slab 1.0: A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries. J. Geophy. Res. 117, B1 (Jan. 2012), B01302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Heinecke, A. Breuer, M. Bader, and P. Dubey. 2016. High Order Seismic Simulations on the Intel Xeon Phi Processor (Knights Landing). In High Performance Computing: 31st International Conference, ISC High Performance 2016, Frankfurt, Germany, June 19-23, 2016, Proceedings. Springer, 343--362.Google Scholar
- A. Heinecke, A. Breuer, S. Rettenberger, M. Bader, A.-A. Gabriel, C. Pelties, A. Bode, W. Barth, X.-K. Liao, K. Vaidyanathan, M. Smelyanskiy, and P. Dubey. 2014. Petascale High Order Dynamic Rupture Earthquake Simulations on Heterogeneous Supercomputers. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. IEEE, New Orleans, 3--14. Gordon Bell Finalist. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Heinecke, G. Henry, M. Hutchinson, and H. Pabst. 2016. LIBXSMM: Accelerating Small Matrix Multiplications by Runtime Code Generation. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. (SC '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 84:1--84:11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Hiroo and K. Masayuki. 1993. The 1992 Nicaragua earthquake: a slow tsunami earthquake associated with subducted sediments. Nature 361, 6414 (Feb. 1993), 714--716.Google Scholar
- Y. Huang, J.-P. Ampuero, and H. Kanamori. 2014. Slip-Weakening Models of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake and Constraints on Stress Drop and Fracture Energy. Pure Appl. Geophys. 171, 10 (2014), 2555--2568.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hutchinson, A. Heinecke, H. Pabst, G. Henry, M. Parsani, and D. Keyes. 2016. Efficiency of High Order Spectral Element Methods on Petascale Architectures. In High Performance Computing: 31st Int. Conf. Springer, 449--466.Google Scholar
- T. Ichimura, K. Fujita, P. E. B. Quinay, L. Maddegedara, M. Hori, S. Tanaka, Y. Shizawa, H. Kobayashi, and K. Minami. 2015. Implicit Nonlinear Wave Simulation with 1.08T DOF and 0.270T Unstructured Finite Elements to Enhance Comprehensive Earthquake Simulation. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. (SC '15). ACM, New York, 4:1--4:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Ichimura, K. Fujita, S. Tanaka, M. Hori, M. Lalith, Y. Shizawa, and H. Kobayashi. 2014. Physics-based urban earthquake simulation enhanced by 10.7 BlnDOFX 30 K time-step unstructured FE non-linear seismic wave simulation. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. IEEE, 15--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Käser and M. Dumbser. 2006. An Arbitrary High Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Elastic Waves on Unstructured Meshes I: The Two-Dimensional Isotropic Case with External Source Terms. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 2 (2006), 855--877.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Käser, M. Dumbser, J. de la Puente, and H. Igel. 2007. Anarbitraryhigh-order Discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes - III. Viscoelastic attenuation. Geophys. J. Int. 168 (2007), 224--242.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Käser and F. Gallovič. 2008. Effects of complicated 3-D rupture geometries on earthquake ground motion and their implications: a numerical study. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 1 (2008), 276--292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. E. Kozdon and E. M. Dunham. 2013. Rupture to the trench: Dynamic rupture simulations of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku earthquake. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103, 2B (2013), 1275--1289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Krüger and M. Ohrnberger. 2005. Spatio-temporal source characteristics of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake as imaged by teleseismic broadband arrays. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 24 (2005), 1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Laske, G. Masters, Z. Ma, and M. Pasyanos. 2013. Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust, Abstract EGU2013-2658. European Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
- R. J. LeVeque. 2002. Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Vol. 31. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- J. Li, W. keng Liao, A. Choudhary, R. Ross, R. Thakur, W. Gropp, R. Latham, A. Siegel, B. Gallagher, and M. Zingale. 2003. Parallel netCDF: A High-Performance Scientific I/O Interface. In Supercomputing, 2003 ACM/IEEE Conference. 39--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.-Y. Lin, X. Le Pichon, C. Rangin, J. C. Sibuet, and T. Maury. 2009. Spatial after-shock distribution of the 26 December 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake in the northern Sumatra area. Geochem. Geophys. 10, 5 (2009).Google Scholar
- Q. Liu, J. Logan, Y. Tian, H. Abbasi, N. Podhorszki, J. Y. Choi, S. Klasky, R. Tchoua, J. Lofstead, R. Oldfield, M. Parashar, N. Samatova, K. Schwan, A. Shoshani, M. Wolf, K. Wu, and W. Yu. 2014. Hello ADIOS: the challenges and lessons of developing leadership class I/O frameworks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 26, 7 (2014), 1453--1473. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Lofstead, R. Oldfield, T. Kordenbrock, and C. Reiss. 2011. Extending Scalability of Collective IO Through Nessie and Staging. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Parallel Data Storage (PDSW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. C. Lozos. 2016. A case for historic joint rupture of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults. Science advances 2, 3 (2016), e1500621.Google Scholar
- S. Ma. 2012. A self-consistent mechanism for slow dynamic deformation and large tsunami generation for earthquakes in the shallow subduction zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39 (2012), 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ma and G. C. Beroza. 2008. Rupture dynamics on a bimaterial interface for dipping faults. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 4 (2008), 1642--1658.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ma and E. T. Hirakawa. 2013. Dynamic wedge failure reveals anomalous energy radiation of shallow subduction earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 375 (2013), 113--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Madariaga. 1983. High frequency radiation from dynamic earthquake fault models. Annales Geophysicae 1, 1 (1983), 17--23.Google Scholar
- A. J. Meltzner, K. Sieh, M. Abrams, D. C. Agnew, K. W. Hudnut, J.-P. Avouac, and D. H. Natawidjaja. 2006. Uplift and subsidence associated with the great Aceh-Andaman earthquake of 2004. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth 111, B2 (2006).Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. F. Moore, N. L. Bangs, A. Taira, S. Kuramoto, E. Pangborn, and H. J. Tobin. 2007. Three-Dimensional Splay Fault Geometry and Implications for Tsunami Generation. Science 318, 5853 (2007), 1128--1131.Google Scholar
- D. D. Oglesby. 2008. Rupture termination and jump on parallel offset faults. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1 (2008), 440--447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. D. Oglesby, R. J. Archuleta, and S. B. Nielsen. 2000. The three-dimensional dynamics of dipping faults. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 3 (2000), 616--628.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Pelties, J. de la Puente, J.-P. Ampuero, G. B. Brietzke, and M. Käser. 2012. Three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulation with a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured tetrahedral meshes. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth 117, B2 (2012). B02309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Rettenberger and M. Bader. 2015. Optimizing Large Scale I/O for Petascale Seismic Simulations on Unstructured Meshes. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER). IEEE Xplore, Chicago, IL, 314--317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Rietmann, M. Grote, D. Peter, and O. Schenk. 2017. Newmark local time stepping on high-performance computing architectures. J. Comput. Phys. 334 (2017), 308--326.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M.E. Rognes, R. C. Kirby, and A. Logg. 2010. Efficient Assembly of H (div) and H (curl) Conforming Finite Elements. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 31, 6 (2010), 4130--4151.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Rojas, S. Day, J. Castillo, and L. A. Dalguer. 2008. Modelling of rupture propagation using high-order mimetic finite differences. Geophys. J. Int. 172, 2 (2008), 631--650.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Roten, Y. Cui, K. B. Olsen, S. M. Day, K. Withers, W. H. Savran, P. Wang, and D. Mu. 2016. High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers. In Proc. Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Anal. IEEE, 82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Roten, K. B. Olsen, H. Magistrale, J. C. Pechmann, and V. M. Cruz-Atienza. 2011. 3D simulations of M7 earthquakes on the Wasatch fault, Utah, part I: Long-period (0-1 Hz) ground motion. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, 5 (2011), 2045--2063.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. M. Saffer and H. J. Tobin. 2011. Hydrogeology and Mechanics of Subduction Zone Forearcs: Fluid Flow and Pore Pressure. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 39 (2011), 157--86.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Schloegel, G. Karypis, and V. Kumar. 2002. Parallel static and dynamic multi-constraint graph partitioning. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 14, 3 (2002), 219--240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Shearer and R. Bürgmann. 2010. Lessons Learned from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Megathrust Rupture. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 38 (2010), 103--131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.-C. Sibuet, C. Rangin, X. Le Pichon, S. Singh, A. Cattaneo, D. Graindorge, F. Klingelhoefer, J.-Y. Lin, J. Malod, T. Maury, and others. 2007. 26th December 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake: Co-seismic and post-seismic motions in northern Sumatra. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 263, 1-2 (Nov. 2007), 88--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. C. Singh, H. Carton, P. Tapponnier, N. D. Hananto, A. P. S. Chauhan, D. Hartoyo, M. Bayly, S. Moeljopranoto, T. Bunting, P. Christie, H. Lubis, and J. Martin. 2008. Seismic evidence for broken oceanic crust in the 2004 Sumatra earthquake epicentral region. Nature Geoscience 1, 11 (Oct. 2008), 777--781.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. H. Stroud. 1971. Approximate calculation of multiple integrals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
- The HDF Group. 2017. HDF5. https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/. (2017).Google Scholar
- E. F. Toro. 1999. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, A Practical Introduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
- K. Tsuda, S. Iwase, H. Uratani, S. Ogawa, T. Watanabe, J. Miyakoshi, and J.-P. Ampuero. 2017. Dynamic Rupture Simulations Based on the Characterized Source Model of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Pure Appl. Geophys. (2017), 1--12.Google Scholar
- C. Uphoff and M. Bader. 2016. Generating high performance matrix kernels for earthquake simulations with viscoelastic attenuation. In 2016 Int. Conf. High Performance Computing Simulation (HPCS). 908--916.Google Scholar
- V. Vishwanath, M. Hereld, and M. E. Papka. 2011. Toward simulation-time data analysis and I/O acceleration on leadership-class systems. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization. 9--14.Google Scholar
- P. Weatherall, K. M. Marks, M. Jakobsson, T. Schmitt, S. Tani, J. E. Arndt, M. Rovere, D. Chayes, V. Ferrini, and R. Wigley. 2015. A new digital bathymetric model of the world's oceans. Earth and Space Science 2, 8 (2015), 331--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Extreme scale multi-physics simulations of the tsunamigenic 2004 sumatra megathrust earthquake
Recommendations
3D acoustic-elastic coupling with gravity: the dynamics of the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami
SC '21: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and AnalysisWe present a highly scalable 3D fully-coupled Earth & ocean model of earthquake rupture and tsunami generation and perform the first fully coupled simulation of an actual earthquake-tsunami event and a 3D benchmark problem of tsunami generation by a ...
SeisSol on Distributed Multi-GPU Systems: CUDA Code Generation for the Modal Discontinuous Galerkin Method
HPCAsia '21: The International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific RegionWe present a GPU implementation of the high order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) scheme in SeisSol, a software package for simulating seismic waves and earthquake dynamics. Our particular focus is on providing a performance portable solution for ...
Petascale high order dynamic rupture earthquake simulations on heterogeneous supercomputers
SC '14: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and AnalysisWe present an end-to-end optimization of the innovative Arbitrary high-order DERivative Discontinuous Galerkin (ADER-DG) software SeisSol targeting Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessor platforms, achieving unprecedented earthquake model complexity through ...
Comments