skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly

Published:18 June 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present a socially assistive robot (SAR) system designed to engage elderly users in physical exercise. We discuss the system approach, design methodology, and implementation details, which incorporate insights from psychology research on intrinsic motivation, and we present five clear design principles for SAR-based therapeutic interventions. We then describe the system evaluation, consisting of a multi-session user study with older adults (n = 33), to evaluate the effectiveness of our SAR exercise system and to investigate the role of embodiment by comparing user evaluations of similar physically and virtually embodied coaches. The results validate the system approach and effectiveness at motivating physical exercise in older adults according to a variety of user performance and outcomes measures. The results also show a clear preference by older adults for the physically embodied robot coach over the virtual coach in terms of enjoyableness, helpfulness, and social attraction, among other factors.

References

  1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). Nursing shortage fact sheet {Fact sheet}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. American Health Care Association. (2008). Summary of 2007 AHCA survey nursing staff vacancy and turnover in nursing facilities {Report}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J. W., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2011). The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1), 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Balakrishnan, V., & Yeow, P. (2007). Texting satisfaction: Does age and gender make a difference? International Journal of Computer Science and Security, 1(1), 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartneck, C. (2003). Interacting with an embodied emotional character. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 55--60). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Baum, E., Jarjoura, D., Polen, A., Faur, D., & Rutecki, G. (2003). Effectiveness of a group exercise program in a long-term care facility: A randomized pilot trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 4(2), 74--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2), 293--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., & Yin, L. (2010). Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. International Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 24(6), 648--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Buerhaus, P. (2008). Current and future state of the US nursing workforce. JAMA, 300, 2422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Department of Health and Human Services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Colcombe, S., & Kramer, A. (2003). Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults. Psychological Science, 14, 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Colcombe, S., Kramer, A., Erickson, K., Scalf, P., McAuley, E., Cohen, N., . . . & Elavsky, S. (2004). Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(9), 3316--3321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawe, D., & Moore-Orr, R. (1995). Low-intensity, range-of-motion exercise: Invaluable nursing care for elderly patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 675--681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dienstbier, R. A., & Leak, G. K. (1976). Effects of monetary reward on maintenance of weight loss: An extension of the overjustification effect. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, D.C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubowsky, S., Genot, F., Godding, S., Kozono, H., Skwersky, A., Yu, H., & Shen Yu, L. (2000). PAMM - a robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1, 570--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fasola, J., & Matarić, M. J. (2010a). Robot motivator: Increasing user enjoyment and performance on a physical/cognitive task. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, 274--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fasola, J. & Matarić, M. J. (2010b). Robot exercise instructor: A socially assistive robot system to monitor and encourage physical exercise for the elderly. 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 416--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Fasola, J. & Matarić, M. J. (2012). Using socially assistive human-robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. In T. Kanade (Ed.), Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Quality of Life Technology, 100(8), 2512--2526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Feil-Seifer, D. J., & Matarić, M. J. (2009). Towards the integration of socially assistive robots into the lives of children with ASD. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Workshop on Societal Impact: How Socially Accepted Robots Can be Integrated in our Society, San Diego, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Feil-Seifer, D. J., & Matarić, M. J. (2010). Using proxemics to evaluate human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 143--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fisher, C. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 273--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. French, B., Tyamagundlu, D., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., & Ding, D. (2008). Towards a virtual coach for manual wheelchair users. Proceedings of International IEEE Symposium of Wearable Computers, 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Fujiyoshi, H., & Lipton, A. (1998, October). Real-time human motion analysis by image skeletonization. Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. George, L., Blazer, D., Hughes, D., & Fowler, N. (1989). Social support and the outcome of major depression. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 478--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jenkins, O. C., Chu, C., & Matarić, M. J. (2004). Nonlinear spherical shells for approximate principal curves skeletonization. (University of Southern California Center for Robotics and Embedded Systems Technical Report, CRES-04--004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jung, Y., & Lee, K. M. (2004). Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. Proceedings of Presence, 2004, 80--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang, N., & Yoon, W. (2008). Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of complicated electronic devices. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 66(6), 425--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kidd, C., Taggart, W., & Turkle, S. (2006). A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3972--3976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3230--3235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Matarić, M. J., Eriksson, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., & Winstein, C. J. (2007). Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 4(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsusaka, Y., Fujii, H., Okano, T., & Hara, I. (2009). Health exercise demonstration robot TAIZO and effects of using voice command in robot-human collaborative demonstration. The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 472--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. McMurdo, M. D., & Rennie, L. M. (1993). A controlled trial of exercise by residents of old people's homes. Age and Ageing, 22, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Moak, Z. B., & Agrawal, A. (2010). The association between perceived interpersonal social support and physical and mental health: Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Public Health, 32, 191--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Thrun, S., & Varma, V. (2002). Experiences with a mobile robotics guide for the elderly. Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 587--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Paykel, E. (1994). Life events, social support and depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 89, 50--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. (1987). Companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60, 743--746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., & Torrey, C. (2007). Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 145--152). New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Spirduso, W., & Clifford, P. (1978). Replication of age and physical activity effects on reaction and movement time. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Stansfeld, S., Rael, G., Head, J., Shipley, M., & Marmot, M. (1997). Social support and psychiatric sickness absence: A prospective study of British civil servants. Psychological Medicine, 27(1), 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Stice, E., Ragan, J., & Randall, P. (2004). Prospective relations between social support and depression: Differential direction of effects for parent and peer support? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 155--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Tapus, A., Tapus, C., & Matarić, M. J. (2008). User-robot personality matching and robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 169--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Tapus, A., Tapus, C., & Matarić, M. (2009). The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (pp. 924--929). IEEE: Kyoto, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Thomas, V., & Hageman, P. (2003). Can neuromuscular strength and function in people with dementia be rehabilitated using resistance-exercise training? Results from a preliminary intervention study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58, M746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Tway, D. C. (1994). A construct of trust (Unpublished dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Vallerand, R. J. (1983). Effect of differential amounts of positive verbal feedback on the intrinsic motivation of male hockey players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 94--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., & Tanie, K. (2002). Analysis of factors that bring mental effects to elderly people in robot assisted activity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2, 1152--1157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., Shell, D. A., & Matarić, M. J. (2006). The role of physical embodiment in human-robot interaction. IEEE Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 117--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D. J., Shell, D. A., & Matarić, M. J. (2007). Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. IEEE Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 872--877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Waldherr, S., Thrun, S., Romero, R., & Margaritis, D. (1998). Template-based recognition of pose and motion gestures on a mobile robot. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 977--982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Weinberg, R. S., & Ragan, J. (1979). Effects of competition, success/failure, and sex on intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly, 50, 503--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Wren, C. R., Azarbayejani, A., Darrell, T., & Pentland, A. P. (1997). Pfinder: Realtime tracking of the human body. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7), 780--785. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader