skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3106477acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for community detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Evolutionary algorithm belongs to the behaviorism which is one of major approaches to artificial intelligence. Community detection is one of the important applications of the evolutionary algorithm. Detecting the community structure, an essential property for complex networks, can help us understand the inherent functions of real systems. It has been proved that genetic algorithm (GA) is feasible for community detection, and yet existing GA-based community detection algorithms still need improving in terms of their robustness and accuracy. A Physarum-based network model (PNM) with an intelligence of recognizing inter-community edges based on a kind of multi-headed slime mold, has been proposed in the phase of GA's initialization for optimization. In this paper, integrated with PNM after three operators of GA during the process of community detection, a novel genetic algorithm, called P-GACD, is proposed to improve the efficiency of GA for community detection. In addition, some experiments are implemented in five real-world networks to evaluate the performance of P-GACD. The results reveal that P-GACD shows an advantage in terms of the robustness and accuracy, contrasted with the existing algorithms.

References

  1. Lada A Adamic and Natalie Glance. 2005. The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 US Election: Divided They Blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery. ACM, 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Qing Cai, Maoguo Gong, Lijia Ma, Shasha Ruan, Fuyan Yuan, and Licheng Jiao. 2015. Greedy Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization for Large-scale Social Network Clustering. Information Sciences 316 (September 2015), 503--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Qing Cai, Lijia Ma, Maoguo Gong, and Dayong Tian. 2014. A Survey on Network Community Detection Based on Evolutionary Computation. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 8, 2 (January 2014), 84--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Aaron Clauset, Mark EJ Newman, and Cristopher Moore. 2004. Finding Community Structure in Very Large Networks. Physical Review E 70, 6 (December 2004), 066111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Santo Fortunato. 2010. Community Detection in Graphs. Physics Reports 486, 3--5 (February 2010), 75--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rodrigo Francisquini, Valrio Rosset, and Mari C. V. Nascimento. 2017. GA-LP: A Genetic Algorithm Based on Label Propagation to Detect Communities in Directed Networks. Expert Systems with Applications 74 (May 2017), 127--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michelle Girvan and Mark EJ Newman. 2002. Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 12 (June 2002), 7821--7826.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Donald Ervin Knuth. 1993. The Stanford GraphBase: A Platform for Combinatorial Computing. Addison-Wesley Reading, Austin, Texas. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dongsheng Li, Qin Lv, Xing Xie, Li Shang, Huanhuan Xia, Tun Lu, and Ning Gu. 2012. Interest-based Real-time Content Recommendation in Online Social Communities. Knowledge-Based Systems 28 (April 2012), 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Xianghua Li, Chao Gao, and Ruyang Pu. 2014. A Community Clustering Algorithm Based on Genetic Algorithm with Novel Coding Scheme. In 2014 10th International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC). IEEE, 486--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mingxin Liang, Chao Gao, and Zili Zhang. 2017. A New Genetic Algorithm Based on Modified Physarum Network Model for Bandwidth-delay Constrained Least-cost Multicast Routing. Natural Computing 16, 1 (March 2017), 85--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yuxin Liu, Chao Gao, Zili Zhang, Yuxiao Lu, Shi Chen, Mingxin Liang, and Li Tao. 2017. Solving NP-hard Problems with Physarum-based Ant Colony System. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB) 14, 1 (January 2017), 108--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yitong Lu, Mingxin Liang, Chao Gao, Yuxin Liu, and Xianghua Li. 2016. A Bio-inspired Genetic Algorithm for Community Mining. In 2016 12th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD). IEEE, 673--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Toshiyuki Nakagaki, Hiroyasu Yamada, and Masahiko Hara. 2004. Smart Network Solutions in an Amoeboid Organism. Biophysical Chemistry 107, 1 (January2004), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mark EJ Newman. 2006. Finding Community Structure in Networks Using the Eigenvectors of Matrices. Physical Review E 74, 3 (September 2006), 036104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mark EJ Newman. 2006. Modularity and Community Structure in Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 23 (June 2006), 8577--8582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mark EJ Newman and Michelle Girvan. 2004. Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks. Physical Review E 69, 2 (February 2004), 026113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Usha Nandini Raghavan, Réka Albert, and Soundar Kumara. 2007. Near Linear Time Algorithm to Detect Community Structures in Large-scale Networks. Physical Review E 76, 3 (September 2007), 036106. 76.036106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Martin Rosvall and Carl T Bergstrom. 2008. Maps of Random Walks on Complex Networks Reveal Community Structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 4 (January 2008), 1118--1123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mursel Tasgin, Amac Herdagdelen, and Haluk Bingol. 2007. Community Detection in Complex Networks Using Genetic Algorithms. (November 2007). https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0491Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Atsushi Tero, Ryo Kobayashi, and Toshiyuki Nakagaki. 2007. A Mathematical Model for Adaptive Transport Network in Path Finding by True Slime Mold. Journal of Theoretical Biology 244, 4 (February 2007), 553--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Atsushi Tero, Seiji Takagi, Tetsu Saigusa, Kentaro Ito, Dan P Bebber, Mark D Fricker, Kenji Yumiki, Ryo Kobayashi, and Toshiyuki Nakagaki. 2010. Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design. Science 327, 5964 (January 2010), 439--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jina Wang. 2009. Ant Colony Algorithms Based Community Clustering Research. Master's thesis. Sun Yat-sen University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilian Weng, Filippo Menczer, and Yong-Yeol Ahn. 2013. Virality Prediction and Community Structure in Social Networks. Scientific Reports 3 (November 2013), 2522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wayne W Zachary. 1977. An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 33, 4 (Winter 1977), 452--473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Xiaoge Zhang and Sankaran Mahadevan. 2017. A Bio-inspired Approach to Traffic Network Equilibrium Assignment Problem. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics PP, 99 (April 2017), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for community detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
      August 2017
      1284 pages
      ISBN:9781450349512
      DOI:10.1145/3106426

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 August 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader