Barriers Faced by Coding Bootcamp Students

ABSTRACT

Coding bootcamps are a new and understudied way of training new software developers. To learn about the barriers bootcamp students face, we interviewed twenty-six coding bootcamp students and analyzed the interviews using the Communities of Practice framework. We found that bootcamps can be part of an alternate path into the software industry and they provided a second chance for those who missed computing education opportunities earlier, particularly for women. While bootcamps represented a second chance, students entering the industry through bootcamps faced great personal costs and risks, often including significant time, money and effort spent before, during, and after their bootcamps. Though the coursework of bootcamps only ranged from three to six months, career change could take students a year or more, with some students even attending sections of multiple bootcamps.

References

1. Stack Overflow developer survey 2016 results. (2016). http://stackoverflow.com/research/developer-survey-2016
2. Maureen Biggers, Anne Brauer, and Tuba Yilmaz. 2008. Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors with CS leavers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 402--406. x978--1--59593--799--5 https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352274
3. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2015. Software developers. Technical Report. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016--17 Edition. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htm
4. Sally A. Carless and Jessica L. Arnup. 2011. A longitudinal study of the determinants and outcomes of career change. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78, 1 (Feb. 2011), 80--91. 0001--8791 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.002
5. Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C. Plaut, Caitlin Handron, and Lauren Hudson. 2013. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex roles 69, 1--2 (2013), 58--71. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x
6. Pauline Rose Clance and Suzanne A. Imes. 1978. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 15, 3 (1978), 241--247. http://www.suzanneimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Imposter-Phenomenon.pdf
7. Mark Guzdial and Allison Elliott Tew. 2006. Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: An instructional design approach for motivating computing education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--58. x978--1--59593--494--9 https://doi.org/10.1145/1151588.1151597
8. Mizuko Ito, Kris Gutiérrez, Sonia Livingstone, Bill Penuel, Jean Rhodes, Katie Salen, Juliet Schor, Julian Sefton-Green, and S. Craig Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning. BookBaby, Cork. x978-0--9887255-0--8
9. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
10. Colleen M. Lewis, Ruth E. Anderson, and Ken Yasuhara. 2016. "I Don't Code All Day": Fitting in Computer Science When the Stereotypes Don't Fit. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--32. x978--1--4503--4449--4 https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960332
11. Louise Ann Lyon, Quinn Burke, Jill Denner, and Jim Bowring. 2017. Should your college computer science program partner with a coding boot camp?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 712--712. x978--1--4503--4698--6 https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022401
12. Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer Jellison Holme, and Kim Nao. 2010. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press.
13. Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2003. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
14. National Center for Education Statistics. 2016. Digest of Education Statistics, 2016. (2016). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_322.10.asp?current=yes
15. Jerome Neapolitan. 1980. Occupational change in mid-career: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior 16, 2 (April 1980), 212--225. 0001--8791 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001--8791(80)90052--4
16. A. K. Peters and A. Pears. 2013. Engagement in Computer Science and IT -- What! A Matter of Identity?. In 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. 114--121. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.42
17. Quincy Larson. 2016. We asked 15,000 people who they are, and how they're learning to code. (May 2016). https://medium.freecodecamp.com/we-asked-15-000-people-who-they-are-and-how-theyre-learning-to-code-4104e29b2781
18. Course Report. 2016a. 2016 Coding Bootcamp Market Size Study. (June 2016). https://www.coursereport.com/reports/2016-coding-bootcamp-market-size-research
19. Course Report. 2016b. 2016 Course Report alumni outcomes & demographics study. (Sept. 2016). https://www.coursereport.com/reports/2016-coding-bootcamp-job-placement-demographics-report
20. Susan R. Rhodes and Mildred Doering. 1983. An integrated model of career change. Academy of Management Review 8, 4 (Oct. 1983), 631--639. 0363--7425, 1930--3807 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1983.4284666
21. Carsten Schulte and Maria Knobelsdorf. 2007. Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--38. x978--1--59593--841--1 https://doi.org/10.1145/1288580.1288585
22. Araba Sey and Maria Garrido. 2016. Coding bootcamps: A strategy for youth employment in developing countries. Research Report. Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington. http://tascha.uw.edu/publications/coding-bootcamps-a-strategy-for-youth-employment-in-developing-countries/
23. Roslyn Smart and Candida Peterson. 1997. Super's Career Stages and the Decision to Change Careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51, 3 (Dec. 1997), 358--374. 0001--8791 https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.1544
24. Etienne Wenger. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
25. Etienne Wenger-Trayner and Beverly Wenger-Trayner. 2015. Communities of practice a brief introduction. (April 2015). http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
26. Judy Williams. 2010. Constructing a new professional identity: Career change into teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 3 (April 2010), 639--647. 0742-051X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.016
27. Brenda Cantwell Wilson and Sharon Shrock. 2001. Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. In Proceedings of the Thirty-second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 184--188. x978--1--58113--329--5 https://doi.org/10.1145/364447.364581
28. Yunwen Ye and Kouichi Kishida. 2003. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 419--429. x978-0--7695--1877-0 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=776816.776867

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Adult education

    • Computing profession

      • Employment issues