skip to main content
10.1109/ANCS.2017.13acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesancsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

ZeroSDN: A Highly Flexible and Modular Architecture for Full-range Network Control Distribution

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent years have seen an evolution of SDN control plane architectures, starting from simple monolithic controllers, over modular monolithic controllers, to distributed controllers. We observe, however, that today's distributed controllers still exhibit inflexibility with respect to the distribution of control logic. Therefore, we propose a novel architecture of a distributed SDN controller in this paper, providing maximum flexibility with respect to distribution.

Our architecture splits control logic into light-weight control modules, called controllets, based on a micro-kernel approach, reducing common controllet functionality to a bare minimum and factoring out all higher-level functionality. Light-weight controllets also allow for pushing control logic onto switches and enable local processing of data plane events to minimize latency and communication overhead. Controllets are interconnected through a message bus supporting the publish/subscribe communication paradigm with specific extensions for content-based OpenFlow message filtering. Publish/subscribe allows for complete decoupling of controllets to further facilitate control plane distribution. We evaluate both, the scalability and performance properties of our architecture, including its deployment on a white-box networking hardware switch.

References

  1. N. L. M. v. Adrichem, B. J. v. Asten, and F. A. Kuipers. Fast Recovery in Software-Defined Networks. In 2014 Third European Workshop on Software Defined Networks, pages 61--66, Sept. 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Basta, A. Blenk, H. B. Hassine, and W. Kellerer. Towards a dynamic SDN virtualization layer: Control path migration protocol. In 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), pages 354--359, Nov. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Bianchi, M. Bonola, A. Capone, and C. Cascone. OpenState: Programming Platform-independent Stateful Openflow Applications Inside the Switch. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 44(2):44--51, Apr. 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Bifulco, J. Boite, M. Bouet, and F. Schneider. Improving SDN with InSPired Switches. In Proceedings of the Symposium on SDN Research, SOSR '16, pages 11:1--11:12, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Big Switch Networks. Floodlight: An Open SDN Controller. http://www.projectfloodlight.org/floodlight/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Bosshart, D. Daly, G. Gibb, M. Izzard, N. McKeown, J. Rexford, C. Schlesinger, D. Talayco, A. Vahdat, G. Varghese, and D. Walker. P4: Programming Protocol-independent Packet Processors. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 44(3):87--95, July 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Broadcom. BroadView: Analytics-Driven Dynamic Path Optimization. https://www.broadcom.com/collateral/tb/BroadView-TB301-RDS.pdf. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Broadcom. Github Repository: OF-DPA. https://github.com/Broadcom-Switch/of-dpa. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Canini, P. Kuznetsov, D. Levin, and S. Schmid. A Distributed and Robust SDN Control Plane for Transactional Network Updates. In Proceedings of INFOCOM'15), Apr. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Cascone, L. Pollini, D. Sanvito, and A. Capone. Traffic Management Applications for Stateful SDN Data Plane. In 2015 Fourth European Workshop on Software Defined Networks, pages 85--90, Sept. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Chappell. Enterprise service bus. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.", 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. R. Curtis, J. C. Mogul, J. Tourrilhes, P. Yalagandula, P. Sharma, and S. Banerjee. DevoFlow: Scaling Flow Management for High-performance Networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, SIGCOMM '11, pages 254--265, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. A. Dixit, F. Hao, S. Mukherjee, T. Lakshman, and R. Kompella. ElastiCon: An Elastic Distributed Sdn Controller. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems, ANCS '14, pages 17--28, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. T. Eugster, P. A. Felber, R. Guerraoui, and A.-M. Kermarrec. The Many Faces of Publish/Subscribe. ACM Comput. Surv., 35(2):114--131, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Google Inc. Protocol Buffers. https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Gude, T. Koponen, J. Pettit, B. Pfaff, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker. NOX: Towards an Operating System for Networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 38(3):105--110, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Hassas Yeganeh and Y. Ganjali. Kandoo: A Framework for Efficient and Scalable Offloading of Control Applications. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks, HotSDN '12, pages 19--24, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hewlett Packard Enterprise. HP Switch Software OpenFlow v1.3 Administrator Guide nl K/KA/KB/WB 15.18. http://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c04777809, Dec. 2016. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. IEEE 802.1AB: Local and Metropolitan Area Network Standards. Station and MAC-Discovery. IEEE Std., 2005. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. iMatix Corporation. ZeroMQ: Distributed Messaging. http://zeromq.org/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Katta, H. Zhang, M. Freedman, and J. Rexford. Ravana: Controller Fault-tolerance in Software-defined Networking. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research, SOSR '15, pages 4:1--4:12, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T. Koponen, M. Casado, N. Gude, J. Stribling, L. Poutievski, M. Zhu, R. Ramanathan, Y. Iwata, H. Inoue, T. Hama, and S. Shenker. Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI '10, pages 1--6, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Krishnamurthy, S. P. Chandrabose, and A. Gember-Jacobson. Pratyaastha: An Efficient Elastic Distributed SDN Control Plane. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, HotSDN '14, pages 133--138, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. nanomsg Documentation. Differences between nanomsg and ZeroMQ. http://nanomsg.org/documentation-zeromq.html, Jan. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. NetOS group, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. ipc-bench results database. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/netos/projects/ipc-bench, Oct. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R. Niranjan Mysore, A. Pamboris, N. Farrington, N. Huang, P. Miri, S. Radhakrishnan, V. Subramanya, and A. Vahdat. PortLand: A Scalable Fault-tolerant Layer 2 Data Center Network Fabric. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 Conference on Data Communication, SIGCOMM '09, pages 39--50, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. ON.LAB - ONOS. ONOS - A new carrier-grade SDN network operating system designed for high availability, performance, scale-out. http://onosproject.org/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Open Networking Foundation. OpenFlow Switch Specification. https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/sdn-resources/onf-specifications/openflow/openflow-switch-v1.3.4.pdf. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. OpenDaylight Foundation. OpenDaylight: Open Source SDN Platform. https://www.opendaylight.org/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. OSGi Alliance. OSGi: Open Services Gateway initiative. https://www.osgi.org/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. D. Pasetto, H. Franke, K. Schleupen, D. Maze, H. Penner, H. Achilles, C. Crawford, and M. Purcell. Design and Implementation of a Network Centric Appliance Platform. In 2012 Brazilian Symposium on Computing System Engineering (SBESC), pages 204--207, Nov. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. B. Pfaff, J. Pettit, T. Koponen, E. Jackson, A. Zhou, J. Rajahalme, J. Gross, A. Wang, J. Stringer, P. Shelar, K. Amidon, and M. Casado. The Design and Implementation of Open vSwitch. pages 117--130, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. O. C. Project. Github Repository: SAI (Switch Abstraction Interface). https://github.com/opencomputeproject/SAI. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryu SDN Framework Community. Ryu: Component-based Software Defined Networking Framework. https://osrg.github.io/ryu/. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Schmid and J. Suomela. Exploiting Locality in Distributed SDN Control. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, HotSDN '13, pages 121--126, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. R. Sherwood and K.-K. Yap. Cbench: an Open-Flow Controller Benchmarker. http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Oflops. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. A. Singh, J. Ong, A. Agarwal, G. Anderson, A. Armistead, R. Bannon, S. Boving, G. Desai, B. Felderman, P. Germano, A. Kanagala, J. Provost, J. Simmons, E. Tanda, J. Wanderer, U. Hölzle, S. Stuart, and A. Vahdat. Jupiter Rising: A Decade of Clos Topologies and Centralized Control in Google's Datacenter Network. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM '15, pages 183--197, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. D. Thaler and C. Hopps. Multipath Issues in Unicast and Multicast Next-Hop Selection. RFC 2991, RFC Editor, November 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. The NOX Controller. Github Repository: NOX Network Control Platform. https://github.com/noxrepo/nox. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. A. Tootoonchian and Y. Ganjali. Hyperflow: a distributed control plane for openflow. In Proceedings of the 2010 internet network management conference on Research on enterprise networking, pages 3--3. USENIX Association, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. S. Vissicchio, O. Tilmans, L. Vanbever, and J. Rexford. Central Control Over Distributed Routing. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM '15, pages 43--56, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. VMWare Inc. Open vSwitch -- An Open Virtual Switch (Nicira Extensions). https://git.io/vgTKL. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. J. Yang, Z. Zhou, T. Benson, X. Yang, X. Wu, and C. Hu. Focus: Function offloading from a controller to utilize switch power. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. S. H. Yeganeh and Y. Ganjali. Beehive: Simple distributed programming in software-defined networks. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Symposium on SDN Research (SOSR '16), Santa Clara, CA, Mar. 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. ZSDN. Github Repository: Java Module Framework. https://github.com/zeroSDN/JMF. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. ZSDN. Github Repository: Zero Module Framework. https://github.com/zeroSDN/ZMF. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. ZSDN. Github Repository: Zero Software Defined Networking; Distributed Software Defined Networking (SDN) Controller. https://github.com/zeroSDN. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader