Super Bowl Live Tweets: The Usage of Social Media during a Sporting Event

ABSTRACT

The development and popularity of social networking sites (SNS) and technology have changed audiences' media consumption patterns, particularly TV viewing. TV audiences share their viewing experiences real-time through computer-mediated communication, which creates a pseudo-communal viewing experience. Typically, social media is well known for assisting this new form of TV viewing practice. There is an emerging body of literature on what types of messages people share with others while they are watching TV and how those messages and conversations are related to the context of the program they are watching. However, little research has been conducted on social media behavior while watching sports games. Therefore, this study plans to analyze the viewer's social TV behaviors and engagement during a Super Bowl game and further compare whether the "coverage of conversations" is related to the nature of the game.

References

1. Newcomb, H. M., and Hirsch, P. M. 1985. Television as a cultural form: Implications for research. Mass Communication Review Yearbook 5, 275--290.
2. Wohn, D. Y., and Na, E. 2011. Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday 16, 3 (Mar. 2011), 1--14.
3. Buschow, C., Schneider B., and Ueberheide, S. 2014. Tweeting television: exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV. Communications-The European Journal of Communication Research 39, 2, 129--149
4. Atkinson, C. 2010. The Backchannel: How Audiences Are Using Twitter and Social Media and Changing Presentations Forever. New Riders.
5. Doughty, M., Rowland, D., and Lawson S. 2011. Co-viewing live TV with digital backchannel streams. In Proceedings of the 9th International Interactive Conference on Interactive Television (Lisbon, Portugal, June 29-July 01, 2011). EuroITV'11. ACM, 141--144.
6. Schirra, S., Sun, H., Bentley, F. 2014. Together alone: motivations for live-tweeting a television series. In Proceedings of the 32th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Canada, April 26-May 01, 2014). CHI'14. ACM, 2441--2450.
7. Bruns, A., and Stieglitz, S. 2013. Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16, 2, 91--108.
8. Ferguson, D. A., and Perse, M. 2000. The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44, 2, 155--174.
9. Lin, C. A. 2006. Technology fluidity and on-demand webcasting adoption. Telematics and Informatics 25, 2, 84--98.
10. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A. M. 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44, 2, 175--196.
11. Advertising Age. 2016. Marketing fact pack. Retrieved from http://adage.com/d/resources/resources/whitepaper/2016-edition-marketing-fact-pack
12. Miller, R., and Washington, K. 2013. Consumer use of media & the Internet. Entertainment, Media & Advertising Market Research Handbook Issue 13, 21--28.
13. Baran, S. J., and Davis, D. K. 2011. Mass Communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment, and Future. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
14. Tan, S. S. 1985. Mass Communication: Theories and Research. Macmillan, New York, NY.
15. Ko, H., Cho, C., and Roberts, M. S. 2005. Internet uses and gratifications: a structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising 24, 2, 57--70.
16. Roy, S. K. 2009. Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context. Computers in Human Behaviour 25, 4, 878--886.
17. Hollenbaugh, E. E. 2010. Personal journal bloggers: profiles of disclosiveness. Computers in Human Behaviour 26, 6, 1657--1666.
18. Kaye, B. K. 2007. Blog use motivations: an exploratory Study. In Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media, M. Tremayne, Ed. Routledge. New York, NY, 127--148.
19. Chen, G. M. 2011. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behaviour 27, 2, 755--762.
20. Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., and Smit E. G. 2011. Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising 30, 1, 13--46.
21. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., and Schkade, L. 2004. Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences 35, 2, 259--288.
22. Shao, G. 2009. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research 19, 1, 7--25.
23. Joinson, A.N. 2008. 'Looking at', 'looking up' or 'keeping up with' people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05-10, 2008), CHI'08. ACM, 1027--1036
24. Ives N. 2013. Super Bowl ratings decline. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/special-report-super-bowl/super-bowl-ratings-decline-year/239592/
25. Steinberg B. 2013. CBS claims record Super Bowl ratings in early tally. Advertising Age, http://adage.com/article/special-report-super-bowl/cbs-claims-super-bowl-ratings-victory-early-tally/239578/
26. Byun, C., Lee, H., and Kim, Y. 2012. Automated Twitter data collecting tool for data mining in social network. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (Bali, Indonesia, December 3-5, 2012). iiWAS'12. ACM. 196--204.
27. Lee, H., Han, Y., Kim, K. K., and Kim, Y. 2014. Sports and social media: Twitter usage patterns during the 2013 Super Bowl broadcast. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design (Istanbul, Turkey, April 24-26, 2014). ICCMTD'14. 250--25

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Social media