ABSTRACT
We introduce a model for supporting collaborative work between people that are physically close to each other. We call this model Single Display Groupware (SDG). In this paper, we describe the model, comparing it to more traditional remote collaboration, We describe the requirements that SDG places on computer technology, and our understanding of the benefits and costs of SDG systems. Finally, we describe a prototype SDG system that we built and the results of a usability test we ran with 60 elementary school children.
- 1.Bedcrson, B. B., Hollan, J. D., Druin, A., Stewart, J., Rogers, D., & Profl, D. (1996). Local Tools: An Alternative to Tool Palettes. In Proceedings of User Interface and Software Technology (LIST 96) ACM Press, pp. 169-170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Bederson, B. B., Hollan, L D., Perlin, K., Meyer, L, Bacon, D., & Fumas, G. (1996). Pad++: A Zoomabl~ Graphical Sketchpad for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7, 3-31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3.Bier, E. A., & Freeman, S. (1991). MM: A User Interface Architecture for Shared Editors on a Single Screen. In Proceedings of User Interface and Software Technology (UIST 91) ACM Press, pp. 79-86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Bricker, L. J. (1998). Collaboratively Controlled Objects in Support of Collaboration. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Buxton, W. (1994). The Three Mirrors of Interaction: A Holistic Approach to User Interfaces. L. MacDonald, & J. Vince (eds.), Interacting With Virtual Environments. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 6.Cockburn, A., & Greenberg, S. (1996). Children's Collaboration Styles in a Newtonian Microworld. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 96) ACM Press, pp. 181- 182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Druin, A., Stewart, J., ProtL D., Bederson, B. B., & Hollan, J. D. (1997). KidPad: A Design Collaboration Between Children, Technologists, and Educators. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CH197) ACM Press, pp. 463-470. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Greenberg, S., & Boyle, M. (1998). Moving between personal devices and public displays. Tech Report 98/630/21, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
- 9.Hall, E. (1968). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor.Google Scholar
- 10.Inkpen, K., Booth, K. S., Klawe, M., & McGrenere, J. (1997). The Effect of Turn-Taking Protocols on Children's Learning in Mouse-Driven Collaborative Environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (G1 97) Canadian Information Processing Society, pp. 138-145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Ishii, H., & UUmer, B. (1997). Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CH197) ACM Press, pp. 234-241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning Together andAlone, 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- 13.Krueger, M. (1991). Artificial Reality 11. Addison- Wesley.Google Scholar
- 14.McGrath, J. E., & HoUingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups Interacting With Technology. Sage. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Myers, B. A., Stiel, H., & Gargiulo, R. (In Press). Collaboration Using Multiple PDAs Connected to a PC. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW 98) ACM Press, Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Pappert, S. (1996). The Connected Family." Bridging the Digital Generation Gap. Longstreet Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T. P., & Halasz, F. G. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In Proceedings of Human Factors m Compul~ng Systems (lnterCH1 93) ACM Press, pp. 391-398. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Rekimoto, J. (1998). A Multiple Device Approach for Supporting Whiteboard-Based Interactions. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CH198) ACM Press, pp. 344-351. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Shu, L., & Flowers, W. (1992). Groupware Experiences in Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design. in Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW 92) ACM Press, pp. 179- 186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Smith, R. B., O'Shea, T., O'MaUey, C., Scanlon, E., & Taylor, J. (1989). Preliminary Experiments With a Distributed, Multi-Media, Problem Solving Environment. In Proceedings of First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Slough, UK: Computer Sciences House, pp. 19-34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Stewart, J. (In Press). Single Display Groupware. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Stewart, J., Raybourp, E., Bederson, B. B., & Druin, A. (1998). When Two Hands Are Better Than One: Enhancing Collaboration Using Single Display Groupware. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CH1 98) ACM Press, pp. 28%288. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration
Recommendations
Single display groupware
CHI EA '97: CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsFace-to-face collaboration of small groups is one of the most common forms of group work, yet group-aware computer support for this type of collaboration is limited. My research examines the effectiveness of Single Display Groupware (SDG), computer ...
When two hands are better than one: enhancing collaboration using single display groupware
CHI '98: CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing SystemsComparing multi-touch tabletops and multi-mouse single-display groupware setups
MexIHC '10: Proceedings of the 3rd Mexican Workshop on Human Computer InteractionIn spite of all the attention paid to multi-touch tabletop displays, little is known about the collaborative tasks they are best suited for in comparison to alternatives such as multi-mouse Single-Display Groupware setups. In this paper, we share the ...
Comments