skip to main content
article
Free Access

Reconstructing a three-dimensional model with arbitrary errors

Published:01 March 1999Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A number of current technologies allow for the determination of interatomic distance information in structures such as proteins and RNA. Thus, the reconstruction of a three-dimensional set of points using information about its interpoint distances has become a task of basic importance in determining molecular structure. The distance measurements one obtains from techniques such as NMR are typically sparse and error-prone, greatly complicating the reconstruction task. Many of these errors result in distance measurements that can be safely assumed to lie within certain fixed tolerances. But a number of sources of systematic error in these experiments lead to inaccuracies in the data that are very hard to quantify; in effect, one must treat certain entries of the measured distance matrix as being arbitrarily “corrupted.”

The existence of arbitrary errors leads to an interesting sort of error-correction problem—how many corrupted entries in a distance matrix can be efficiently corrected to produce a consistent three-dimensional structure? For the case of an n × n matrix in which every entry is specified, we provide a randomized algorithm running in time O(n log n) that enumerates all structures consistent with at most (1/2-ε)n errors per row, with high probability. In the case of randomly located errors, we can correct errors of the same density in a sparse matrix-one in which only a β fraction of the entries in each row are given, for any constant βgt;0.

References

  1. BOLKER, E. D., AND ROTH, B. 1980. When is a bipartite graph a rigid framework? Pacific J. Math. 90, 27-44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BOLLOBAS, B. 1978. Extremal Graph Theory. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CAUCHY, A.L. 1813. Sur les polygones et poly6dres. J. E, cole Polytech. 19 87-90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. COYYELLY, R. 1991. On generic global rigidity. In Applied Geometry and Discrete Mathematics, DIMACS Series, vol. 4. P. Gritzmann, B. Sturmfels et al., eds. American Mathematics Society, Providence, R.I., pp. 147-155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CRIPPEN, G. M., AND HAVEL, T.F. 1988. Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DRESS, A., AND HAVEL, T. F. 1988. Shortest-path problems and molecular conformation. Disc. Appl. Math. 19, 129-144. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DRESS, A., AND HAVEL, T.F. 1991. Bound smoothing under chirality constraints. SIAM J. Disc. Math. 4 535-549. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. HENDRICKSON, B. 1992. Conditions for unique graph realizations. SIAM J. Comput. 21, 65-84. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. HENDRICKSON, B. 1990. The molecule problem: Determining conformation from pairwise distances. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HENNENBERG, L. 1911. Die graphische Statik der starren Systeme. Leipzig.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. KOLATA, G. 1978. Geodesy: Dealing with an enormous computer task. Science 200 421-422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. LANE, A., AND FULCHER, T. 1995. aH NMR relaxation and NOE's in nucleic acids. J. Magn. Res. 107, 34-42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. MILNOR, J. 1964. On the Betti numbers of real varieties. Proc. AMS 15, 275-280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. NI, F. 1995. Two-dimensional transferred NOE effects with incomplete averaging of free- and bound-ligand resonances. J. Magn. Res. 106, 147-155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. RAGHAVAN, P. 1988. Probabilistic construction of deterministic algorithms: Approximating packing integer programs. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 37, 130-143. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. SAXE, J. 1979. Embeddability of weighted graphs in k-space is strongly NP-hard. In Proceedings of the 19th Allerton Conference on Computers, Controls, and Communications. pp. 480-489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. THOM, R. 1965. Sur l'homologie des vari6t6s alg6briques r6elles. In Differential and Combinatorial Topology, S. S. Cairns, ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. WANG, A., KIM, S., FLYNN, P., CHOU, S., ORBAN, J., AND REID, B. 1992. Errors in RNA NOESY distance measurements in chimeric and hybrid duplexes: differences in RNA and DNA proton relaxation. Biochemistry 31, 3940-3946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. WHITELEY, W. 1984. Motions of a bipartite framework. Pacific J. Math. 110, 233-255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. WIDER, G., MACURA, S., KUMAR, A., ERNST, R., AND WUTHRICH, K. 1984. Homonuclear twodimensional 1H NMR of proteins. Experimental procedures. J. Magn. Res. 56, 207-234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. WUYDEaLICH, W. 1977. Untersuchungen zu einem trilaterations mit komplanaren standpunkten. Sitz. Osten. Akad. Wiss. 186, 263-280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. WUTHRICH, K. 1986. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ZHU, L., AND REID, B. 1995. An improved NOESY simulation program for partially relaxed spectra: BIRDER, J. Magn. Res. 106, 227-235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reconstructing a three-dimensional model with arbitrary errors

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader