Abstract
In this work, we investigate the visual appearance of real-world surfaces and the dependence of appearance on the geometry of imaging conditions. We discuss a new texture representation called the BTF (bidirectional texture function) which captures the variation in texture with illumination and viewing direction. We present a BTF database with image textures from over 60 different samples, each observed with over 200 different combinations of viewing and illumination directions. We describe the methods involved in collecting the database as well as the importqance and uniqueness of this database for computer graphics. A related quantity to the BTF is the familiar BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function). The measurement methods involved in the BTF database are conducive to simultaneous measurement of the BRDF. Accordingly, we also present a BRDF database with reflectance measurements for over 60 different samples, each observed with over 200 different combinations of viewing and illumination directions. Both of these unique databases are publicly available and have important implications for computer graphics.
- ASTM. Standard E1392-90, Standard practice for angle resolved optical scatter measurements on specular or diffuse surfaces. American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
- BECKER, B. G. AND MAX, N. L. 1993. Smooth transitions between bump rendering algorithms. Comput. Graph. SIGGRAPH 93, 27, (Aug.), 183-190. Google Scholar
- BETTY, C. L., FUNG, A. K., AND IRONS, J. 1996. The measured polarized bidirectional reflectance distribution function of a spectralon calibration target. In Proceedings of IGARSS '96, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Lincoln, NE, May 27-31) 2183-2185.Google Scholar
- BLINN, g. F. 1977. Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures. Comput. Graph. SIGGRAPH 77, 11, (July), 192-198. Google Scholar
- BLINN, J. F. 1978. Simulation of wrinkled surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 78, 286 -292. Google Scholar
- BORN, M. AND WOLF, E. 1959. Principles of Optics, Pergamon, New York.Google Scholar
- CHATTERJEE, S. 1993. Classification of natural textures using Gaussian Markov random fields. In Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, Boston, 159-177.Google Scholar
- DANA, K. J. AND NAYAR, S.K. 1998. Histogram model for 3D textures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Santa Barbara, CA, June 23-25), 618-624. Google Scholar
- DANA, K. J., VAN GINNEKEN, B., NAYAR, S. K., AND KOENDERINK, J.J. 1996. Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces. Columbia University, Tech. Rep. CUCS-048-96, Dec.Google Scholar
- DANA, K. J., VAN GINNEKEN, B., NAYAR, S. K., AND KOENDERINK, J.J. 1997. Reflectance and texture of real world surfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (San Juan, PR, June 17-19), 151-157. Google Scholar
- DEBEVEC, P. E., TAYLOR, C. J., AND MALIK, J. 1996. Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry and image-based approach. Comput. Graph. SIG- GRAPH 96 (Aug.), 11-20. Google Scholar
- VAN GINNEKEN, B., KOENDERINK, J. J., AND DANA, K. J. 1997. Texture histograms as a function of irradiation and viewing direction. Int. J. Comput. Vis. (to appear). Google Scholar
- VAN GINNEKEN, B., STAVRIDI, M., AND KOENDERINK, J.J. 1998. Diffuse and specular reflectance from rough surfaces. Appl. Opt. 37 (Jan.), 130-139.Google Scholar
- GOURAUD, H.1971. Continuous shading of curves surfaces. IEEE Trans. Comput. (June), 623-629.Google Scholar
- HECKBERT, P.S. 1986. A survey of texture mapping. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 6 (Nov.), 56-67. Google Scholar
- HERREN, K.A. 1989. Measurements of polarization scattering in the vacuum ultraviolet. In Polarization Considerations for Optical Systems II, Proceedings of the SPIE (San Diego, CA, Aug. 9-11), Vol. 1166, 33-41.Google Scholar
- HOWARD, T. L., GEORGE, P. M., FLAMMANG, S., AND MOSSMAN, D. 1989. Vacuum BRDF measurements of cryogenic optical surfaces. In Scatter from Optical Components, Proceedings of the SPIE (San Diego, CA, Aug. 8-10), Vol. 1165, 350-359.Google Scholar
- HORN, B. K. P. AND BROOKS, M.J. 1989. Shape from Shading. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
- KARNER, K. F., MAYER, H., AND GERVAUTZ, M. 1996. An image based measurement system for anisotropic reflection. Comput. Graph. Forum (EUROGRAPHICS '96) 15, 3 (Aug.), 119-28.Google Scholar
- KASHYAP, R.L. 1984. Characterization and estimation of two-dimensional ARMA models. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor. IT-30, 5 (Sept.), 736-745.Google Scholar
- KOENDERINK, J. J. AND VAN DOORN, A.J. 1996. Illuminance texture due to surface mesostructure. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 3, 452-463.Google Scholar
- KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A. J., AND STAVRIDI, M. 1996. Bidirectional reflection distribution function expressed in terms of surface scattering modes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, 28-39. Google Scholar
- KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A. J., DANA, K. J., AND NAYAR, S. K. 1998. Bidirectional reflection distribution function of thoroughly pitted surfaces. Int. J. Comput. Vis. (to appear). Google Scholar
- KRUMM, J. AND SHAFER, S.A. 1995. Texture segmentation and shape in the same image. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision (Cambridge, MA, June 20-23), 121-127. Google Scholar
- LEUNG, T. AND MALIK, J. 1997. On perpendicular texture: Why do we see more flowers in the distance? In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR (San Juan, PR, June 17-19), 807-813. Google Scholar
- LEWIS, J. P. 1989. Algorithms for solid noise synthesis. Comput. Graph. 23, 3 (July), 263-270. Google Scholar
- LI, Z., FUNG, A. K., GIBBS, D., BETTY, C. L., TJUATJA, S., AND IRONS, J.R. 1994. A modeling study of bidirectional reflectance from soil surfaces. In Proceedings of IGARSS '94, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Pasadena, CA, Aug. 8-12), 1835-1837.Google Scholar
- MARX, E. AND VORBURGER, T. V. 1989. Light scattered by random rough surfaces and roughness determination. In Scatter from Optical Components, Proceedings of the SPIE (Aug.), Vol. 1,165, 72-86.Google Scholar
- NAYAR, S. K. AND OREN, M. 1995. Visual appearance of matte surfaces. Science 267 (Feb.), 1153-1156.Google Scholar
- NAYAR, S. K., IKEUCHI, K., AND KANADE, T. 1991. Surface reflection: Physical and geometrical perspectives. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 7 (July), 611-634. Google Scholar
- NICODEMUS, F.E. 1970. Reflectance nomenclature and directional reflectance and emissivity. Appl. Opt. 9, 1474-1475.Google Scholar
- NICODEMUS, F. E., RICHMON, J. C., HSIA, J. J., GINSBERG, I. W., AND LIMPERIS, T. 1977. Geometric considerations and nomenclature for reflectance. NBS Monograph 160, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, Oct.Google Scholar
- NOLIN, A. W., STEFFEN, K., AND DOZIER, J. 1994. Measurement and modeling of the bidirectional reflectance of snow. In Proceedings of IGARSS '94, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Pasadena, CA, Aug. 8-12), 1919-1921.Google Scholar
- OREN, M. AND NAYAR, S.K. 1995. Generalization of the Lambertian model and implications for machine vision. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 14, 227-251. Google Scholar
- PATEL, M. A. S. AND COHEN, F. S. 1992. Shape from texture using Markov random field models and stereo-windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR (Champaign, IL, June 15-18), 290-305.Google Scholar
- PEACHEY, D. R. 1985. Solid texturing of complex surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1985, Comput. Graph. 19, 279-286. Google Scholar
- PERLIN, K. 1985. An image synthesizer. Comput. Graph. 19, 3 (July), 287-296. Google Scholar
- PERLIN, K. 1989. Hypertexture. Comput. Graph. 23, 3 (July), 253-262. Google Scholar
- PICARD, R. W., KABIR, T., AND LIU, F. 1993. Real-time recognition with the entire Brodatz texture database. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR (New York, NY, June 15-17), 638-639.Google Scholar
- POULIN, P. AND FOURNIER, A. 1990. A model for anisotropic reflection. Comput. Graph. 24, 4 (Aug.), 273-282. Google Scholar
- SAKAS, G. AND KERNKE, B. 1994. Texture shaping: A method for modeling arbitrarily shaped volume objects in texture space. In Photorealistic Rendering in Computer Graphics, Proceedings of the Second Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, Springer-Verlag, New York, 206-218.Google Scholar
- SANDMEIER, S., SANDMEIER, W., ITTEN, K. I., SCHAEPMAN, M. E., AND KELLENBERGER, T. W. 1995. The Swiss field-goniometer system. In Proceedings of IGARSS '95, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (July), 2078-2080.Google Scholar
- SCHLUESSEL, D., DICKINSON, R. E., PRIVETTE, J. L., EMERY, W. J., AND KOKALY, R. 1994. Modeling the bidirectional reflectance distribution function of mixed finite plant canopies and soil. J. Geophys. Res. 99, D5 (May), 10577-600.Google Scholar
- STAVRIDI, M., VAN GINNEKEN, B., AND KOENDERINK, J.J. 1997. Surface bidirectional reflection distribution function and the texture of bricks and tiles. Appl. Opt. 36, 16 (June), 3717-3725.Google Scholar
- STOVER, J.C. 1989. Scatter from optical components: An overview. In Scatter from Optical Components, Proceedings of the SPIE (San Francisco, CA, Aug. 8-10), Vol. 1165, 2-9.Google Scholar
- SUEN, P. AND HEALEY, G. 1998. Analyzing the bidirectional texture function. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR (San Diego, CA, June 23-25), 753-758. Google Scholar
- SUPER, B. J. AND BOVIK, A.C. 1995. Shape from texture using local spectral moments. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 17, 333-343. Google Scholar
- TAGARE, H. D. AND DEFIGUEIREDO, R. J. P. 1993. A framework for the construction of reflectance maps for machine vision. CVGIP: Image Understand. 57, 3 (May), 265-282. Google Scholar
- TORRANCE, K. E. AND SPARROW, E.M. 1967. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 9, 1105-1114.Google Scholar
- WANG, L. AND HEALEY, G. 1996. Illumination and geometry invariant recognition of texture in color images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR (San Francisco, CA, June 18-20), 419-424. Google Scholar
- WARD, G.J. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. Comput. Graph. 26, 2, ACM SIGGRAPH (July), 265-272. Google Scholar
- WESTIN, S. H., ARVO, J. R., AND TORRANCE, K.E. 1992. Predicting reflectance functions from complex surfaces. Comput. Graph. 26, 2, ACM SIGGRAPH (July), 255-263. Google Scholar
- WOLFF, L. B. 1994. A diffuse reflectance model for smooth dielectrics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A--Special Issue on Physics Based Machine Vision (Nov.), 2956-2968.Google Scholar
- WOODHAM, R.J. 1980. Photometric methods for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Opt. Eng. 19, 1, 139-144.Google Scholar
- XIE, Z. AND BRADY, M. 1996. Texture segmentation using local energy in wavelet scale space. ECCV 1, 304-313. Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces
Recommendations
Reflectance and Texture of Real-World Surfaces Authors
CVPR '97: Proceedings of the 1997 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '97)In this work, we investigate the visual appearance of real-world surfaces and the dependence of appearance on imaging conditions. We present a BRDF (bidirectional reflectance distribution function) database with reflectance measurements for over 60 ...
Synthesizing bidirectional texture functions for real-world surfaces
SIGGRAPH '01: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesIn this paper, we present a novel approach to synthetically generating bidirectional texture functions (BTFs) of real-world surfaces. Unlike a conventional two-dimensional texture, a BTF is a six-dimensional function that describes the appearance of ...
Modeling and Verifying the Polarizing Reflectance of Real-World Metallic Surfaces
Researchers have introduced many bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) models for computer graphics. Some are purely appearance-based heuristics, whereas others are physically plausible. To achieve plausibility, researchers have ...
Comments