skip to main content
10.1145/3085228.3085248acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Public Managers' Perceptions about Open Government: A Factor Analysis of Concepts and Values

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Open Government (OG) is pushing towards an important change in terms of how we currently understand public management. Recently, OG has attracted the attention of multiple actors from within the governmental sphere and beyond. However, little is known about how this new paradigm is evolving. For the development of this investigation, we surveyed all Spanish municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants and asked about the level of association of selected concepts with OG. We carried out an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the factors in which the concepts are grouped. This led us to determine the existence of three perspectives from which local governments are developing and implementing OG: a) democratic values of coresponsibility, b) technological innovation, and c) availability and access to information.

References

  1. Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Criado, J. I, Sandoval-Almazán, R., and Gil-García, R. (2013). Government Innovation through Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 320--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gascó, M. (ed.) (2014). Open government. Opportunities and challenges for public governance. New York: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee, G., and Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., and Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Petrušić, D., Segedinac, M., and Konjović, Z. (2016). Semantic modelling and ontology integration of the open government systems. Tehnički vjesnik, 23(6), 1631--1641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., and Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., Thomas, M. J., and Daiser, P. (2015). Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public Management Review, 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Public Managers' Perceptions about Open Government: A Factor Analysis of Concepts and Values

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
      June 2017
      639 pages
      ISBN:9781450353175
      DOI:10.1145/3085228

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 June 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      dg.o '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of114submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader