skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083681acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interpersonal Influence in Viral Social Media: A Study of Refugee Stories on Virality

Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The expansion of social media use has enabled massive and rapid spreadability of content, which is often referred to as virality. Earlier studies have examined various aspects of virality such as the attributes of stories that become viral. In this on-going study we aim to make a better sense of the role of interpersonal influences in the spreadability of viral social media content. In this, we are inspired by Tarde's views on interpersonal processes and the notion of imitation. Considering the recent mass migrations, and numerous viral stories that have related to the plight of refugees, we chose a group of Syrian refugees consisting of men and women as the participants for this study. In twelve in-depth qualitative interviews we learned about the participants' views on viral stories as well as the way in which their interpersonal influences may play a role in their interaction with viral stories. The findings show that the views on migrant-related viral stories varied among the participants, but a common view seemed to be somewhat of scepticism about the agenda behind the spread of these stories. As part of the study, we identified four key interpersonal influences including community conversation, formative consciousness, community boundaries, and retrospective experiences. A main conclusion in the study is that although back-end technical issues, content attributes, emotions and so on may play a role in virality, still human agency, connections and interpersonal ties play a major role in shaping the process that leads to content spreadability, hence virality.

References

  1. Bauman, Z. 2016. Social media are a trap. URL: http://elpais.com/elpais/2016/01/19/inenglish/1453208692_424660.html (visited on 09/12/2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jenkins, H., Ford, S. and Green, J. 2013. Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaplan, A., and Haenlein, M. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons 53, 1, 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wegner, P. 1997. Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Communications of the ACM 40, 5, 80--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rushkoff, D. 1994. Media Virus: hidden agendas in popular culture. Ballantine Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, J., and Milkman, K. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research XLIX, 192--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Berger, J., and Milkman, K. 2013. Emotion and virality: what makes online content go viral?. Insights 5, 1, 18--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Broxton, T., Interian, Y., Vaver, J., and Wattenhofer, M. 2013. Catching a viral video. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 40, 2, 241--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mangold, W. G., and Faulds, D. J. 2009. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons 52, 4, 357--365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stein, M.-K., Newell, S., Wagner, E. L., and Galliers, R. D. 2014. Felt quality of sociomaterial relations: Introducing emotions into sociomaterial theorizing. Information and Organization 24, 156--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tarde, G. 1903. The laws of imitation. New York: Henry Holt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Abrutyn, S., and Mueller, A. 2014. Reconsidering Durkheim's assessment of Tarde: formalizing a Tardian theory of imitation, contagion, and suicide suggestion. Sociological Forum 29, 3, 698--719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bradimore, A., and Bauder, H. 2011. Mystery ships and risky boat people: Tamil refugee migration in the newsprint media. Canadian Journal of Communication 36, 4, 637.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. O'Doherty, K., and Lecouteur, A. (2007). Asylum seekers","boat people" and "illegal immigrants": Social categorisation in the media. Australian journal of psychology 59, 1, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zetter, R. 2007. More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies 20, 2,172--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Komito, L. 2011. Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 6, 1075--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dekker, R. and Engbersen, G. 2014. How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks 14, 4, 401--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y., and Moon, S. 2007. I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kahn, R., and Kellner, D. 2004. New media and Internet activism: from the 'Battle of Seattle' to blogging. New Media & Society 6, 1, 87-- 95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Castells, M. 2012. Networks of outrage and hope - Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gladwell, M. 2010. Small change. The New Yorker 86, 30, 42--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Edgerly, S., ... and Wells, C. 2013. YouTube, Twitter and The Occupy Movement. Information, Communication & Society 16, 3, 421 --451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Valenzuela, S. 2013. Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 7, 920--942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Della, P., and Diani, M. 2006. Social movements: an introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Cammaert, B. 2015. Social Media and Activism. In The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society. R. Mansell & P. Hwang (Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 1027--1034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, E. 2006. Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde. Political Communication 23, 3, 263--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Katz, E. 1999. Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566, 1, 144--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Roulston, K. 2010. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research 10, 2, 199--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ponterotto, J. 2006. Brief note on the origins, Evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept Thick Description. The Qualitative Report 11, 3, 538--549.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultze, U. and Avital, M. 2011. Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization 21, 1, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Klein, H. and Myers, M.D. 1999. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS quarterly, 67--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kaplan, B., and Maxwell, J. A. 1994. Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems. In Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications. J. G. Anderson, C. E. Aydin, and S. J. Jay (Eds.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, 45--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Boland, R. J. Jr. 1991. Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process. In Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, and R. A. Hirschheim, North-Holland, Amsterdam (Eds.), 439--464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Bowen, G. 2006. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, 3, 12--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Bowen, G. 2008. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research 8, 1, 137--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interpersonal Influence in Viral Social Media: A Study of Refugee Stories on Virality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
      June 2017
      345 pages
      ISBN:9781450348546
      DOI:10.1145/3083671

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader