skip to main content
10.1145/3077981.3078055acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The social-dance: decomposing naturalistic dyadic interaction dynamics to the 'micro-level'

Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The 'social dance' is an implicit, yet vital, characteristic of dyadic interactions. Attempts to characterize this complex behavior have illustrated unconscious levels of content and temporal entrainment within artificial social contexts. Yet, when viewed in a naturalistic setting, this complex systems problem faces a number of methodological and theoretical challenges. Utilizing precise kinematic recordings while adopting the 'micro-movement' approach, cross coherence analysis and tenets of graph theory, this paper presents an analytical framework to characterize unfolding, nonlinear temporal exchange and entrainment across a social dyad. This framework is empirically demonstrated within a clinical domain of individuals with known social difficulties: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Results illustrate the ability for this objective methodology to quantify variability in social dynamics, and profile dyadic entrainment during naturalistic exchange -- with no a priori constraints or limitations. Viewed within the context of a clinical assessment tool for ASD, results facilitate consideration of clinician impact on dyadic exchange, and point to a potential refinement of core tasks associated with such clinical batteries.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association et al. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marie Avril, Chloë Leclère, Sylvie Viaux, Stéphane Michelet, Catherine Achard, Sylvain Missonnier, Miri Keren, David Cohen, and Mohamed Chetouani. 2014. Social signal processing for studying parent--infant interaction. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 1437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher A Buneo, Murray R Jarvis, Aaron P Batista, and Richard A Andersen. 2002. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416, 6881 (2002), 632--636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Emilie Delaherche, Mohamed Chetouani, Ammar Mahdhaoui, Catherine Saint-Georges, Sylvie Viaux, and David Cohen. 2012. Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 3 (2012), 349--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Christopher D Frith, Daniel M Wolpert, et al. 2003. The neuroscience of social interaction. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Apostolos P Georgopoulos, Andrew B Schwartz, Ronald E Kettner, et al. 1986. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233, 4771 (1986), 1416--1419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kenneth Kaye and Alan Fogel. 1980. The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology 16, 5 (1980), 454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Catherine Lord, Pamela C DiLavore, and Katherine Gotham. 2012. Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Western Psychological Services Torrance, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Livio Provenzi, Renato Borgatti, Giorgia Menozzi, and Rosario Montirosso. 2015. A dynamic system analysis of dyadic flexibility and stability across the Face-to-Face Still-Face procedure: application of the State Space Grid. Infant Behavior and Development 38 (2015), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Michael J Richardson, Kerry L Marsh, Robert W Isenhower, Justin RL Goodman, and Richard C Schmidt. 2007. Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human movement science 26, 6 (2007), 867--891.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Giacomo Rizzolatti, Rosolino Camarda, Leonardo Fogassi, Maurizio Gentilucci, Giuseppe Luppino, and Massimo Matelli. 1988. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. Experimental brain research 71, 3 (1988), 491--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mikail Rubinov and Olaf Sporns. 2010. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 3 (2010), 1059--1069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Catherine Saint-Georges, Ammar Mahdhaoui, Mohamed Chetouani, Raquel S Cassel, Marie-Christine Laznik, Fabio Apicella, Pietro Muratori, Sandra Maestro, Filippo Muratori, and David Cohen. 2011. Do parents recognize autistic deviant behavior long before diagnosis? Taking into account interaction using computational methods. PloS one 6, 7 (2011), e22393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. RC Schmidt, Nicole Christianson, Claudia Carello, and Reuben Baron. 1994. Effects of social and physical variables on between-person visual coordination. Ecological Psychology 6, 3 (1994), 159--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. RC Schmidt, Paula Fitzpatrick, Robert Caron, and Joanna Mergeche. 2011. Understanding social motor coordination. Human movement science 30, 5 (2011), 834--845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Elizabeth B Torres, Maria Brincker, Robert W Isenhower, Polina Yanovich, Kimberly A Stigler, John I Nurnberger, Dimitris N Metaxas, and Jorge V José. 2013. Autism: the micro-movement perspective. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 7 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Elizabeth B Torres, Robert W Isenhower, Jillian Nguyen, Caroline Whyatt, John I Nurnberger, Jorge V Jose, Steven M Silverstein, Thomas V Papathomas, Jacob Sage, and Jonathan Cole. 2016. Toward precision psychiatry: statistical platform for the personalized characterization of natural behaviors. Frontiers in neurology 7 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Elizabeth B Torres and Brian Lande. 2015. Objective and personalized longitudinal assessment of a pregnant patient with post severe brain trauma. Frontiers in human neuroscience 9 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. E von Holst. 1971. H. Mittelstaedt The principle of reafference: interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. PC Dodwell (ed. and trans.), Perceptual Processing: Stimulus Equivalence and Pattern Recognition.(Reprinted from Die Naturwissenschaften, 1950.) Appleton, New York (1971).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Peter Welch. 1967. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on audio and electroacoustics 15, 2 (1967), 70--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Caroline Whyatt and Cathy Craig. 2013. Sensory-motor problems in Autism. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience 7 (2013), 51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Justin HG Williams, Gordon D Waiter, Anne Gilchrist, David I Perrett, Alison D Murray, and Andrew Whiten. 2006. Neural mechanisms of imitation and fimirror neuronfifunctioning in autistic spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia 44, 4 (2006), 610--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Daniel M Wolpert and Mitsuo Kawato. 1998. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural networks 11, 7 (1998), 1317--1329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The social-dance: decomposing naturalistic dyadic interaction dynamics to the 'micro-level'

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
          June 2017
          206 pages
          ISBN:9781450352093
          DOI:10.1145/3077981

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader