skip to main content
10.1145/3077981.3078041acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Capturing and Documenting Creative Processes in Contemporary Dance

Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The performing arts, and dance in particular, have been considered as intangible cultural heritage by UNESCO since 2003. This acknowledgement reflects the importance of preserving the knowledge generated within this art form for future generations. Nevertheless, what and how this sensible material should be preserved is still lacking clear methodological approaches. When considering creative processes, this seems an even more daunting task, as it goes beyond simply documenting the final product of a creation. Recent advancements in technology has allowed to consider other approaches of capturing data apart from video or photography, which are mostly static and have a single viewpoint. In this paper we describe how 3D data capture and point cloud visualization techniques have been used to capture and document João Fiadeiro's choreographic and compositional processes. Together with Fiadeiro we have identified a sub-set of core concepts of his method which have then been used to conduct two improvisation sessions involving Fiadeiro's dancers and himself. Those concepts have been used as the basis for the development of new visualization techniques that better illustrate, in an interactive system, the complexity of Fiadeiro's creative process.

References

  1. 2010 (accessed Jan 12, 2017). Motion Bank. http://motionbank.org/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2010 (accessed Jan 20, 2017). Transmedia Knowledge-Base for performing arts. http://tkb.fcsh.unl.pt/content/knowledge-base-performing-arts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2011 (accessed Jan 10, 2017). The ECLAP e-library of performing arts. http://labs.europeana.eu/apps/eclap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2013 (accessed Jan 10, 2017). The Choreographic Archive of Siobhan Davies Dance. http://www.siobhandaviesreplay.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2013 (accessed Jan 10, 2017). The Pina Bausch Archive. http://www.pinabausch.org/en/archive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2013 (accessed Jan 12, 2017). Synchronous Objects. http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2014 (accessed Jan 3, 2017). Europeana Project. http://www.europeana.eu/portal/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2017 (Accessed: 2017-04-22). K3 fi Centre for Choreography - REFLEX Europe. http://k3-hamburg.de/en/koopprojekte.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andreas Aristidou, Efstathios Stavrakis, Panayiotis Charalambous, Yiorgos Chrysanthou, and Stephania Loizidou Himona. 2015. Folk Dance Evaluation Using Laban Movement Analysis. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 8, 4 (2015), 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Scott Delahunta and Norah Zuniga Shaw. 2008. Choreographic resources agents, archives, scores and installations. Performance Research 13, 1 (2008), 131--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N Grammalidis, K Dimitropoulos, F Tsalakanidou, A Kitsikidis, P Roussel, B Denby, P Chawah, L Buchman, S Dupont, S Laraba, and others. 2016. The i-Treasures Intangible Cultural Heritage dataset. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing. ACM, 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Valeria Lo Iacono and David HK Brown. 2016. Beyond Binarism: Exploring a Model of Living Cultural Heritage for Dance. Dance Research 34, 1 (2016), 84--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stephan Jürgens, Francisco Henriques, and Carla Fernandes. 2016. Re-Constructing the Choreographic Studio of João Fiadeiro Through Animated Infographic Films. PARtake: The Journal of Performance as Research 1, 1 (2016), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett. 2014. Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production. Museum International 66, 1--4 (2014), 163--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cheryl LaFrance. 2011. Choreographersfi Archives: Three Case Studies in Legacy Preservation. Dance Chronicle 34, 1 (2011), 48--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S.J. Norman. 2016. Dancing on Occam's Razor: Expressive Movement and Place. In Multimodal Communication in Language, Performance and Digital Media, C. Fernandes (Ed.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, 82--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Claudia Ribeiro, Rafael Kuffner, Carla Fernandes, and João Pereira. 2016. 3D Annotation in Contemporary Dance: Enhancing the Creation-Tool Video Annotator. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing (MOCO '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Radu Bogdan Rusu and Steve Cousins. 2011. 3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL). In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Shanghai, China.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sarah Whatley. 2013. Siobhan Davies RePlay:(Re) visiting the digital archive. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 9, 1 (2013), 83--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Capturing and Documenting Creative Processes in Contemporary Dance

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
        June 2017
        206 pages
        ISBN:9781450352093
        DOI:10.1145/3077981

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader