skip to main content
10.1145/3077981.3078033acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Delay Mirror: a Technological Innovation Specific to the Dance Studio

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper1. evaluates the use of the Delay Mirror (DM) in the dance studio. The DM is a device that records a video stream which is rendered immediately on a large screen, but with a delay of a few seconds. A dancer can observe her own movements in the same way she would do so when looking at a normal mirror. However, the delay allows her to observe dynamic movements which cannot usually be observed other than in video. We evaluate whether this device can be useful in the context of a dance class, and whether it complements the normal mirror, while being less intrusive than a normal video recording which is recorded and then re-played, possibly interrupting workflow. Qualitative evaluation was performed in the context of an advanced-level adult ballet course.

References

  1. Sarah Fdili Alaoui, Kristin Carlson, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2014. Choreography As Mediated Through Compositional Tools for Movement: Constructing A Historical Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Movement and Computing (MOCO '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1:1--1:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Carlson, T. Schiphorst, and P. Pasquier. 2011. Scuddle: Generating Movement Catalysts for Computer-Aided Choreography. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity. http://iccc11.cua.uam.mx/proceedings/the_helpful/carlson_iccc11.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kristin Carlson, Herbert H. Tsang, Jordon Phillips, Thecla Schiphorst, and Tom Calvert. 2015. Sketching Movement: Designing Creativity Tools for In-situ, Whole-body Authorship. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing (MOCO '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jennifer Kaplan. 2010. Kids Make Dance. (May 2010). http://www.dancestudiolife.com/kids-make-dance/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Z. Li. 2011. How technology shapes our way of teaching dance. In Proceedings of the 2010 World Dance Alliance Global Summit (1), Linda Caldwell (Ed.), Vol. 1. World Dance Alliance-Americas, New York. http://www.twu.edu/dance/world-dance-alliance-proceedings.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luis Molina-Tanco, Carmen García-Berdonés, and Arcadio Reyes-Lecuona. 2015. El Espejo Retardado: una innovaciÃşn tecnolÃşgica para el aula de danza. In Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Danza, Investigación y Educación. MÃąlaga, Spain. http://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/handle/10630/12527?show=fullGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sally A. Radell. 2013. Mirrors in the Dance Class: Help or Hindrance? - International Association for Dance Medicine & Science. (2013). https://www.iadms.org/page/400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Suzanne Robertson and James Robertson. 2012. Mastering the Requirements Process: Getting Requirements Right (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Vikash Singh, Celine Latulipe, Erin Carroll, and Danielle Lottridge. 2011. The choreographer's notebook: a video annotation system for dancers and choreographers. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. ACM, 197--206. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2069653 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Robert K. Yin. 2015. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish, Second Edition (2nd edition ed.). The Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Delay Mirror: a Technological Innovation Specific to the Dance Studio

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
          June 2017
          206 pages
          ISBN:9781450352093
          DOI:10.1145/3077981

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader