ABSTRACT
As most database users cannot precisely express their information needs in the form of database queries, it is challenging for database query interfaces to understand and satisfy their intents. Database systems usually improve their understanding of users' intents by collecting their feedback on the answers to the users' imprecise and ill-specified queries. Users may also learn to express their queries precisely during their interactions with the database system. In this paper, we report our progress on developing a formal framework for representing and understanding information needs in database querying and exploration. Our framework considers querying as a collaboration between the user and the database system to establish a mutual language for representing information needs. We formalize this collaboration as a signaling game between two potentially rational agents: the user and the database system. We believe that this framework naturally models the long-term interaction of users and database systems.
- Azza Abouzied, Dana Angluin, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Joseph M. Hellerstein, and Avi Silberschatz. 2013. Learning and verifying quantified boolean queries by example. In PODS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paolo Avesani and Marco Cova. 2005. Shared lexicon for distributed annotations on the Web. In WWW. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. A. Barrett and K. Zollman. 2008. The Role of Forgetting in the Evolution and Learning of Language. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 21, 4 (2008), 293--309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Beckers and others. 2010. Report on INEX 2009. SIGIR Forum 44, 1 (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Angela Bonifati, Radu Ciucanu, and Slawomir Staworko. 2015. Learning Join Queries from User Examples. TODS 40, 4 (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Surajit Chaudhuri, Gautam Das, Vagelis Hristidis, and Gerhard Weikum. 2006. Probabilistic Information Retrieval Approach for Ranking of Database Query Results. TODS 31, 3 (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi Chen, Wei Wang, Ziyang Liu, and Xuemin Lin. 2009. Keyword Search on Structured and Semi-structured Data. In SIGMOD. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Cho and D. Kreps. 1987. Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (1987).Google Scholar
- Norbert Fuhr and Thomas Rolleke. 1997. A Probabilistic Relational Algebra for the Integration of Information Retrieval and Database Systems. TOIS 15 (1997). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vagelis Hristidis, Luis Gravano, and Yannis Papakonstantinou. Efficient IR-Style Keyword Search over Relational Databases. In VLDB 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stratos Idreos, Olga Papaemmanouil, and Surajit Chaudhuri. 2015. Overview of Data Exploration Techniques. In SIGMOD. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. V. Jagadish, Adriane Chapman, Aaron Elkiss, Magesh Jayapandian, Yunyao Li, Arnab Nandi, and Cong Yu. 2007. Making Database Systems Usable. In SIGMOD. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nodira Khoussainova, YongChul Kwon, Magdalena Balazinska, and Dan Suciu. 2010. SnipSuggest: Context-aware Autocompletion for SQL. PVLDB 4, 1 (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Lewis. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hao Li, Chee-Yong Chan, and David Maier. 2015. Query From Examples: An Iterative, Data-Driven Approach to Query Construction. PVLDB 8, 13 (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiyun Luo, Sicong Zhang, and Hui Yang. 2014. Win-Win Search: Dual-Agent Stochastic Game in Session Search. In SIGIR. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schutze. 2008. An Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben McCamish, Arash Termehchy, Behrouz Touri, and Eduardo Cotilla Sanchez. 2016. A Signaling Game Approach to Databases Querying. In AMW.Google Scholar
- Aleksandr Vorobev, Damien Lefortier, Gleb Gusev, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2015. Gathering Additional Feedback on Search Results by Multi-Armed Bandits with Respect to Production Ranking. In WWW. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yahoo! 2011. Yahoo! webscope dataset anonymized Yahoo! search logs with relevance judgments version 1.0. http://labs.yahoo.com/Academic_Relations. (2011). {Online; accessed 5-January-2017}.Google Scholar
- Yinan Zhang and Chengxiang Zhai. 2015. Information Retrieval as Card Playing: A Formal Model for Optimizing Interactive Retrieval Interface. In SIGIR. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
A Game-theoretic Approach to Data Interaction
Best of SIGMOD 2018 and Best of PODS 2018As most users do not precisely know the structure and/or the content of databases, their queries do not exactly reflect their information needs. The database management system (DBMS) may interact with users and use their feedback on the returned results ...
The Data Interaction Game
SIGMOD '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of DataAs many users do not precisely know the structure and/or the content of databases, their queries do not exactly reflect their information needs. The database management systems (DBMS) may interact with users and leverage their feedback on the returned ...
A Signaling Game Approach to Databases Querying and Interaction
ICTIR '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information RetrievalAs most database users cannot precisely express their information needs, it is challenging for database querying and exploration interfaces to understand them. We propose a novel formal framework for representing and understanding information needs in ...
Comments