skip to main content
10.1145/3064663.3064700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Guided Selfies using Models of Portrait Aesthetics

Published:10 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce techniques enabling interactive guidance for better self-portrait photos ("selfies") using a smartphone cam- era. Aesthetic quality is estimated using empirical models for three parameterized composition principles: face size, face position, and lighting direction. The models are built using 2,700 crowdworker assessments of highly-controlled synthetic selfies. These are generated by manipulating a virtual camera and lighting when rendering a realistic 3D model of a human to methodically explore the parameter space. A camera application uses the models to estimate the aesthetic quality of a live selfie preview based on parameters measured by computer vision. The photographer is guided towards a better selfie by directional hints overlaid on the live preview. A study shows the technique provides a 26% increase in aesthetic quality compared to a standard camera application.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

disfp0318-file3.mp4

mp4

78.6 MB

References

  1. ArtInCam LTD. 2014. Camera51. (2014). https://www.camera51.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Subhabrata Bhattacharya, Rahul Sukthankar, and Mubarak Shah. 2010. A Framework for Photo-quality Assessment and Enhancement Based on Visual Aesthetics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia (MM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Stephen A. Brewster and Jody Johnston. 2008. Multimodal Interfaces for Camera Phones. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Scott Carter, John Adcock, John Doherty, and Stacy Branham. 2010. NudgeCam: Toward Targeted, Higher Quality Media Capture. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 615--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Géry Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, and Daniel Vogel. 2012. 1 filter: a simple speed-based low-pass filter for noisy input in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2527--2530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xiaowu Chen, Xin Jin, Hongyu Wu, and Qinping Zhao. 2015. Learning templates for artistic portrait lighting analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 2 (2015), 608--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. John Child. 2008. Studio Photography: Essential Skills. Focal Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Casio Computer Co. 2016. Life Style Digital Cameras. (2016). http://www.casio-intl.com/asia-mea/en/dc/lineup/ Hardware: Digital Cameras.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ritendra Datta, Dhiraj Joshi, Jia Li, and JamesZ. Wang. 2006. Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2006, Aleš Leonardis, Horst Bischof, and Axel Pinz (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3953. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 288--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T.L. Berg. 2011. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on. 1657--1664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Christina Dickson. 2009. 6 Tips for Perfect Composition in Portrait Photography. (Sept. 2009). http://digital-photography-school.com/ 6-tips-for-perfect-composition-in-portrait-photography/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Felix Esser. 2014. Camera51 Android app makes you a master photographer by guiding your framing. (Oct. 2014). http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/camera51-android-app-makes-master-photographer-guiding-framing/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ohad Fried, Eli Shechtman, Dan B. Goldman, and Adam Finkelstein. 2016. Perspective-aware Manipulation of Portrait Photos. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 4, Article 128 (July 2016), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dmitry O Gorodnichy and Gerhard Roth. 2004. Nouse 'use your nose as a mouse' perceptual vision technology for hands-free games and interfaces. Image and Vision Computing 22, 12 (2004), 931--942.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Melanie Hall. 2013. Family albums fade as the young put only themselves in picture. (June 2013). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Darlene Hildebrandt. 2013. Lighting Ratios to Make or Break your Portrait. (2013). http://digital-photography-school.com/lighting-ratios-to-make-or-break-your-portrait/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bill Hurter. 2007. Portrait Photographer's Handbook (3 ed.). Amherst Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wei Jiang, A.C. Loui, and C.D. Cerosaletti. 2010. Automatic aesthetic value assessment in photographic images. In Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. 920--925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahdi M Kalayeh, Misrak Seifu, Wesna LaLanne, and Mubarak Shah. 2015. How to take a good selfie?. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 923--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shehroz S. Khan and Daniel Vogel. 2012. Evaluating Visual Aesthetics in Photographic Portraiture. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging (CAe '12). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 55--62. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2328888.2328898 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Masahito Kumano, Kuniaki Uehara, and Yasuo Ariki. 2006. Online training-oriented video shooting navigation system based on real-time camerawork evaluation. In Multimedia and Expo, 2006 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1281--1284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Congcong Li and Tsuhan Chen. 2009. Aesthetic Visual Quality Assessment of Paintings. Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of 3, 2 (April 2009), 236--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. LuMee LLC. 2016a. LuMee Phone Case. (2016). https://lumee.com/collections/all {Hardware: Phone Accessory}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ty-Lite LLC. 2016b. Ty-Lite Phone Case. (2016). https://ty-lite.com {Hardware: Phone Accessory}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wei Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2011. Content-based photo quality assessment. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. 2206--2213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shuang Ma, Yangyu Fan, and Chang Wen Chen. 2014. Finding your spot: A photography suggestion system for placing human in the scene. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 556--560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Males, A. Hedi, and M. Grgic. 2013. Aesthetic quality assessment of headshots. In ELMAR, 2013 55th International Symposium. 89--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lev Manovich. 2014. SelfieCity. (2014). http://selfiecity.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Filippo Mazza, Matthieu Perreira Da Silva, Patrick Le Callet, and IEJ Heynderickx. 2015. What do you think of my picture? Investigating factors of influence in profile images context perception. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 93940D.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Christopher McAdam, Craig Pinkerton, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2010. Novel Interfaces for Digital Cameras and Camera Phones. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. P. Obrador, L. Schmidt-Hackenberg, and N. Oliver. 2010. The role of image composition in image aesthetics. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on. 3185--3188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Bahareh Rahmanian and Joseph G Davis. 2014. User interface design for crowdsourcing systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 405--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Miriam Redi, Nikhil Rasiwasia, Gaurav Aggarwal, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2015. The Beauty of Capturing Faces: Rating the Quality of Digital Portraits. CoRR abs/1501.07304 (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07304Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Patrick Rice. 2005. Professional Techniques for Black & White Digital Photography. Amherst Media, Buffalo, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jose San pedro and Karen Church. 2013. The Sound of Light: Induced Synesthesia for Augmenting the Photography Experience. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 745--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Lai-Kuan Wong and Kok-Lim Low. 2009. Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on. 997--1000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yan Xu, Joshua Ratcliff, James Scovell, Gheric Speiginer, and Ronald Azuma. 2015. Real-time Guidance Camera Interface to Enhance Photo Aesthetic Quality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1183--1186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lei Yao, Poonam Suryanarayan, Mu Qiao, James Z Wang, and Jia Li. 2012. Oscar: On-site composition and aesthetics feedback through exemplars for photographers. International Journal of Computer Vision 96, 3 (2012), 353--383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Guided Selfies using Models of Portrait Aesthetics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2017
      1444 pages
      ISBN:9781450349222
      DOI:10.1145/3064663

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader