Alena Denisova
ABSTRACT
Challenge is arguably the most important experience that players seek in digital games. However, without a measure of how challenged players feel during the act of play, it is hard to design games that are neither too easy nor too hard and, therefore, truly enjoyable. Especially in industry, challenge is dominantly assessed by means of manual play testing in ad-hoc trials. The aim of this research is to create a more systematic, complete, and reliable instrument to evaluate the level of players' experienced challenge in games in the form of a questionnaire. This paper presents the key results from an extensive literature survey which will inform further development. We survey definitions of challenge, challenge types, and their relation to player experience based on the observations of game designers. We furthermore draw from empirical findings in a diverse range of fields such as game studies, human-computer interaction (HCI) and artificial intelligence (AI).
- Sami Abuhamdeh and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2012. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 3 (2012), 317--330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427147 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sami Abuhamdeh, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, and Baland Jalal. 2015. Enjoying the possibility of defeat: Outcome uncertainty, suspense, and intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion 39, 1 (2015), 1--10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014--9425--2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ernest Adams. 2014. Fundamentals of game design. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Scott Bateman, Andre Doucette, Robert Xiao, Carl Gutwin, Regan L Mandryk, and Andy Cockburn. 2011. Effects of view, input device, and track width on video game driving. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, 207--214. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1992917.1992952Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philip Bontrager, Ahmed Khalifa, Andre Mendes, and Julian Togelius. 2016. Matching Games and Algorithms for General Video Game Playing. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE).Google Scholar
- Tom Cole, Paul Cairns, and Marco Gillies. 2015. Emotional and Functional Challenge in Core and Avant-garde Games. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 121--126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793147 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Cox, Paul Cairns, Pari Shah, and Michael Carroll. 2012. Not doing but thinking: the role of challenge in the gaming experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 79--88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207689 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. The psychology of optimal experience. Harper&Row, New York.Google Scholar
- John P Davis, Keith Steury, and Randy Pagulayan. 2005. A survey method for assessing perceptions of a game: The consumer playtest in game design. Game Studies 5, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
- Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4 (2000), 227--268. www.jstor.org/stable/1449618 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Difficulty. 2016. Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
- Laura Ermi and Frans Mäyrä. 2005. Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. Worlds in play: International perspectives on digital games research 37 (2005), 2.Google Scholar
- John Feil and Marc Scattergood. 2005. Beginning game level design. Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
- Fong-Ling Fu, Rong-Chang Su, and Sheng-Chin Yu. 2009. EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education 52, 1 (2009), 101--112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shang Hwa Hsu, Ming-Hui Wen, and Muh-Cherng Wu. 2007. Exploring design features for enhancing players' challenge in strategy games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 3 (2007), 393--397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9940 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, Vol. 4. 1.Google Scholar
- Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Yvonne De Kort, Karolien Poels, Audrius Jurgelionis, and Francesco Bellotti. 2007. Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In International conference on advances in computer entertainment technology, Vol. 2. 27. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt015Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan A Jackson, Herbert W Marsh, and others. 1996. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of sport and exercise psychology 18 (1996), 17--35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charlene Jennett, Anna L Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International journal of human-computer studies 66, 9 (2008), 641--661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesper Juul. 2009. Fear of failing? the many meanings of difficulty in video games. The video game theory reader 2 (2009), 237--252.Google Scholar
- Madison Klarkowski, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Mitchell McEwan, Cody Phillips, and Simon Smith. 2016. Operationalising and Evaluating Sub-Optimal and Optimal Play Experiences through Challenge-Skill Manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5583--5594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858563 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Klimmt. 2003. Dimensions and determinants of the enjoyment of playing digital games: A three-level model. In Level up: Digital games research conference. 246--257.Google Scholar
- Christoph Klimmt, Tilo Hartmann, and Andreas Frey. 2007. Effectance and control as determinants of video game enjoyment. Cyberpsychology & behavior 10, 6 (2007), 845--848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9942 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicole Lazzaro. 2004. Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. (2004).Google Scholar
- Geoffrey R Loftus and Elizabeth F Loftus. 1983. Mind at play; The psychology of video games. Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
- Thomas W Malone. 1981. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive science 5, 4 (1981), 333--369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017--1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thorbjørn S Nielsen, Gabriella A B Barros, Julian Togelius, and Mark J Nelson. 2015. General Video Game Evaluation Using Relative Algorithm Performance Profiles. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Springer, 369--380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--16549--3_30Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karolien Poels, Yvonne De Kort, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2007. It is always a lot of fun!: exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play. ACM, 83--89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hua Qin, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, and Gavriel Salvendy. 2009. Measuring player immersion in the computer game narrative. Intl. Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2009), 107--133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--74873--1_60Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Rouse III. 2010. Game design: Theory and practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344--360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006--9051--8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2004. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesse Schell. 2014. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC Press. Google ScholarCross Ref
- John L Sherry, Kristen Lucas, Bradley S Greenberg, and Ken Lachlan. 2006. Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences 24 (2006), 213--224. http: //www.allacademic.com/meta/p111471_index.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Ben Shneiderman. 1982. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. ACM SIGSOC Bulletin 13, 2--3 (1982), 143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.1983.1654471 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 3, 3 (2005), 3--3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Vorderer, Tilo Hartmann, and Christoph Klimmt. 2003. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Carnegie Mellon University, 1--9.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Challenge in Digital Games: Towards Developing a Measurement Tool
Recommendations
Measuring perceived challenge in digital games: Development & validation of the challenge originating from recent gameplay interaction scale (CORGIS)
Highlights- Scale measuring perceived challenge in video games.
- Four sub-scales (30 items) ...
AbstractChallenge is a key element of digital games, but a clear conceptualisation and operationalisation of this player experience were long missing. This made it hard for game researchers to measure this experience in different video games ...
Power-Ups in Digital Games: The Rewarding Effect of Phantom Game Elements on Player Experience
CHI PLAY '19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayPower-ups are a type of game reward that allow the player to customise their experience by altering gameplay for a short period of time. Despite the wide use of power-ups in video games, little is known about their effect on gaming experiences. To ...
Relevance and Immersion in Digital Games: Content and Personal Factors
CHIuXiD '17: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in IndonesiaPrevious studies have investigated the effects of diverse game design features on player immersion. The current study investigated the relationship between game content and immersion. When players are immersed in a game, they perceive that they are "...
Comments