skip to main content
10.5555/3042094.3042378acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of the general applicability of Dragoon for the k-center problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The k-center problem is a fundamental problem we often face when considering complex service systems. Typical challenges include the placement of warehouses in logistics or positioning of servers for content delivery networks. We previously have proposed Dragoon as an effective algorithm to approach the k-center problem. This paper evaluates Dragoon with a focus on potential worst case behavior in comparison to other techniques. We use an evolutionary algorithm to generate instances of the k-center problem that are especially challenging for Dragoon. Ultimately, our experiments confirm the previous good results of Dragoon, however, we also can reliably find scenarios where it is clearly outperformed by other approaches.

References

  1. Gonzalez, T. F. 1985. "Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance". Theoretical Computer Science 38:293 -- 306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hillmann, P., L. Stiemert, G. D. Rodosek, and O. Rose. 2015a, Dec. "Dragoon: Advanced Modelling of IP Geolocation by Use of Latency Measurements". In 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), 438--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hillmann, P., L. Stiemert, G. D. Rodosek, and O. Rose. 2015b, Nov. "Modelling of IP Geolocation by Use of Latency Measurements". In Network and Service Management (CNSM), 2015 11th International Conference on, 173--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hillmann, P., T. Uhlig, G. D. Rodosek, and O. Rose. 2015, Nov. "A Novel Approach to Solve k-Center Problems with Geographical Placement". In Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 31--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hochbaum, D. S., and D. B. Shmoys. 1985. "A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem". Mathematics of Operations Research 10:180--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jamin, S., C. Jin, A. R. Kurc, D. Raz, and Y. Shavitt. 2001. "Constrained Mirror Placement on the Internet". In INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Volume 1, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kleinberg, J., and E. Tardos. 2005. Algorithm Design. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. MacQueen, J. 1967. "Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations". In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, 281--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen, A. M., J. Yosinski, and J. Clune. 2014. "Deep Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images". Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition abs/1412.1897.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Selim, S. Z., and M. A. Ismail. 1984. "k-Means-Type Algorithms: A Generalized Convergence Theorem and Characterization of Local Optimality". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1): 81--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Uhlig, T. 2015. Self-Replicating Individuals. München: Dr. Hut.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Evaluation of the general applicability of Dragoon for the k-center problem

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSC '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference
      December 2016
      3974 pages
      ISBN:9781509044849

      Publisher

      IEEE Press

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 December 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader