skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025918acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Best Paper

mHealth for Maternal Mental Health: Everyday Wisdom in Ethical Design

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Health and wellbeing applications increasingly raise ethical issues for design. User-centred and participatory design approaches, while grounded in everyday wisdom, cannot be expected to address ethical reflection consistently, as multiple value systems come into play. We explore the potential of phronesis, a concept from Aristotelian virtue ethics, for mHealth design. Phronesis describes wisdom and judgment garnered from practical experience of specific situations in context. Applied phronesis contributes everyday wisdom to challenging issues for vulnerable target users. Drawing on research into mHealth technologies for psychological wellbeing, we explore how phronesis can inform ethical design. Using a case study on an app for self-reporting symptoms of depression during pregnancy, we present a framework for incorporating a phronetic approach into design, involving: (a) a wide feedback net to capture phronetic input early in design; (b) observing the order of feedback, which directly affects value priorities in design; (c) ethical pluralism recognising different coexisting value systems; (d) acknowledging subjectivity in the disclosure and recognition of individual researcher and participant values. We offer insights into how a phronetic approach can contribute everyday wisdom to designing mHealth technologies to help designers foster the values that promote human flourishing.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3653p.mp4

mp4

1.9 MB

References

  1. Abdullah, S., Matthews, M., Frank, E., Doherty, G., Gay, G. & Choudhury, T. (2016) Automatic detection of social rhythms in Bipolar Disorder. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocv200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andorno, R. (2012) Do Our Moral Judgements Need to Be Guided by Principles? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21(4), 457--465 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aristotle (2011). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by R.C. Bartlett and S.D. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. (2015). Humanistic HCI, Morgan & Claypool PublishersGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bardzell, J. (2009). Interaction Criticism and Aesthetics, CHI Proceedings of the ACM 2009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Barry, M (2014) Please do touch: Discourses on aesthetic interactivity in the exhibition space. Participations Vol.11 (1)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, M., Doherty, G (2016) 'What we talk about when we talk about interactivity: Empowerment in public discourse', New Media & Society, online February 2, 2016 DOI:10.1177/1461444815625944 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bauer, A., Parsonage, M., Knapp, M., Iemmi, V., Adelaja, B. (2014). The cost of perinatal mental health problems. London: Centre for Mental Health, London School of Economics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Belman, J., Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H., Diamond, J. Grow-A-Game: A tool for values conscious design and analysis of digital games. DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play, 14--17, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein, R. (1983) Beyond Objectivism and Relativism Philadelphia: University of PA PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of NordiCHI, ACM (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Broadbent et al. (2014) The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, European Commission, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/onlife-manifestoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brey, P. (2000) Disclosive Computer Ethics, Computers and Society, 30, 4:10--16, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brown, C (2012) The 'Practice Turn', Phronesis and Classical realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium Journal of International Studies 40, 3:439--456 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Calvo, R.A., Peters, D (2014) Positive Computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential, MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carolan, M (2016) "'Unborn child' has significant legal rights, judge rules", Irish Times, August 2, 2016 [available at www.irishtimes.com]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky, R (1987) Detection of post-natal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, British Journal of Psychiatry Jun 150:782--786Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., Horvitz, E (2013) Predicting Postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media, Proceedings of CHI 2013, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Detweiler, C., Pommeranz, A. Stark, L. (2012) Methods to account for values in human-centered computing. CHI EA '12, 2735--2738 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D'Ignazio, C., Hope, A., Michelson, B, Churchill, R., Zuckerman, E (2016) A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke.", Proceedings of CHI 2016, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Doherty, G., Coyle, D., Sharry, J. (2012). Engagement with Online Mental Health Interventions: An Exploratory Clinical Study of a Treatment for Depression, Proceedings of CHI '12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Doherty, G., Coyle, D., Matthews, M., (2010a) Design and evaluation guidelines for mental health technologies, Interacting with Computers 22, 4: 243-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Doherty, G., McKnight, J., Luz, S (2010b) Fieldwork for requirements: Frameworks for mobile healthcare applications, Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 68:760--776 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ess, C. (2013) Digital Media Ethics 2nd Edition, Cambridge: Polity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ess, C. (2015) The Good Life: Selfhood and virtue ethics in the digital age. In Communication and "The Good Life", International Communication Association (ICA) Annual Conference Theme Book, Hua Wang (Ed.), Peter Lang Publishing GroupGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eubanks, V. (2012) 'Feminist phronesis and technologies of citizenship', in Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (eds.) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 228--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Fallman, D (2011) The New Good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings of CHI 2011, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Fairclough, N. (2013) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, RoutledgeGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H (2014) Values at Play in Digital Games, MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Flanagan, M., Howe, DC, Nissenbaum, H (2005) Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design, Proceedings of CHI 2005, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (2012a) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T. and Schram, S. (2012b) 'Introduction: new directions in social science', in Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (eds.) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Friedman, Batya (1996) Value Sensitive Design, interactions, December 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedman, B., Kahn. PH. Jr., Borning, A. (2013) Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. (1993) User autonomy: Who should control what and when? Proceedings of CHI '96 ACM, p. 433Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Gadamer, H.G (1975) Truth and Method, London, ContinuumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk, University of PA Press, Philadelphia, PAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hackett, EJ (2012) Science, Technology & Human Values at 40, Science, Technology & Human Values 37, 5:439--442 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Hammelink C.J (2006) Rethinking ICTs: ICTs on a human scale. European Journal of Communication 21, 3: 389--396 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N (2006) User experience -- a research agenda, Behavior & Information Technology 25, 2:91--97 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Hekler EB., Klasnja, P., Froehlich, JE., Buman, MP (2013). Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of CHI 2013. ACM, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Howarth, D. (2000) Discourse Open University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, J. (2014) Conceptual models: Core to Good Design, Extended Abstracts CHI '14, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kahneman, D., Riis, J., (2005) Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. The science of wellbeing, 285--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Kamp, I., Desmet, P. (2014) Measuring Product Happiness, CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kientz, J, Arriaga, RI, Abowd, GD (2009) Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children, Proceedings of CHI 2009, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Koepfler, JA., Stark, L., Dourish, P, Sengers, P, Shilton, K (2014) Values & Design in HCI Education, Workshop, CHI 2014, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Knobel, C.P., Bowker, G.C. (2011) Values in design. Communications of the ACM, 54(7), pages 26--28, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ko, J. Y., Farr, S. L., Dietz, P. M., Robbins, C. L. (2012). Depression and Treatment Among U.S. Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age, 2005 -- 2009. Journal of Women's Health; 21(8): 830 -- 836. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Kroenke, K., Spitzer RL., Williams, JBW (2001) The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure, J Gen Intern Med 16, 9: 606--613 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Landman, T. (2012) 'Phronesis and narrative analysis', in Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (eds.) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 27--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Le Dantec, C.A. Poole, E.S. Wyche, S.P. (2009). Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. Proceedings of CHI '09, 1141--1150 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Light, A., and Luckin, R. (2008). Designing for social justice: People, technology, and learning. [available at Futurelab: www.futurelab.org.uk/openingeducation]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. McCarthy, J., Wright, P. (2004) Technology as Experience MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. McCourt, D. (2012) Phronesis and Foreign Policy in theory and practice, e-International Relations, Nov 2012 [available at http://www.eir.info/2012/11/23/phronesis-and-foreign-policy-intheory-and-practice/]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Maguire, M. (2001) Methods to support human-centred design, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 55 587--634 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Matthews, M., Doherty, G (2009) The Invisible User, Interactions, Nov 2009, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Matthews, M., Doherty, G. (2011) In the mood: engaging teenagers in psychotherapy using mobile phones. Proceedings of CHI 2011, 2947--2956. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Meyer, J., Simske S., Siek, K., Gurrin, C., Hermens, HJ (2014) Beyond Quantified Self: Data for wellbeing, Workshop, CHI 2014, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Moggridge, B [2007] Designing Interactions, MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Muller, MJ., Druin, A (2010) "Participatory design: the third space in HCI." in Handbook of HCI 2nd Edition, Eds Sears, A., Jacko, J , Erlbaum, NJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Perrier, T., Dell, N., DeRenzi, B., Anderson, R., Kinuthia, J., Unger, J., John-Stewart, G. (2015). Engaging Pregnant Women in Kenya with a Hybrid Computer-Human SMS Communication System. CHI '15. ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Peyton, T., Poole, E., Reddy, M., Kraschnewski, J., Chuang, C. (2014) "Every pregnancy is different": Designing mHealth interventions for the pregnancy ecology, DIS '14, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Sandelowski, M (1994) Separate, but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood, Gender and Society 8:230--245 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Sas, C., Whittaker, S., Dow, S., Forlizzi J., Zimmerman J (2014) Generating Implications for Design through Design Research, Proceedings of CHI '14, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Schram, S. (2012) 'Phronetic social science: an idea whose time has come', in Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (eds.) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 15--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Sengers, P., Boehner, L., David, S., and Kaye, JJ. (2005) Reflective Design. In CC '05: Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing, 4958, ACM 2005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., Hufford, M. R., (2008) Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4, 1--32 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Shilton, K. (2012). Values levers: building ethics into design. Science, Technology & Human Values 38, 3:374--397 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Shilton, K., Anderson, S (2016) Blended not Bossy: Ethics, roles, responsibilities and expertise in design, Interacting with Computers, 2016 DOI 10.1093/iwc/iww002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Shilton, Koepfler and Fleischmann (2012) 'Chartering sociotechnical dimensions of values for design research' Information society -- 29 (5)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Siegel, M. A., and Beck, J. (2014) "Slow change interaction design." Interactions 21.1 (2014): 28--35 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Spiekermann, S. (2015). Ethical IT innovation: A Value-Based System Design Approach, Taylor & Francis Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Suh, H., Porter, JR., Hiniker, A., Kientz, JA. 2014. @BabySteps: Design and Evaluation of a System for using Twitter for Tracking Children's Developmental Milestones. Proceedings of CHI'14: 2279--2288 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Thieme, A., Balaam, M., Wallace, J., Coyle, D., & Lindley, S. (2012). Designing wellbeing. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 789790. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Vallor, S. (2014) Moral Deskilling and Upskilling in a New Machine Age: Reflections on the Ambiguous Future of Character, Philosophy and Technology Vol. 28 107--124 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Vallor, S (2012) Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship & new social media, Ethics & Information Technology 14, 185--199 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Van der Velden, M., Machniak Sommervold, M (2016) Moodline and MoodMap: Designing a mood function for a mobile application with and for young patients. Proceedings of eTELEMED 2016 : Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, IARIA, ISBN - 978--1--61208--470--1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Verbeek, P.P. (2008) Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: a Postphenomenological Analysis, Human Studies 31:11-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., Olivier, P., (2013) Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. Proceedings of CHI 2013. ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Walsh, S., Golden, E., Priebe, S. 2015. Systematic review of patients' participation in and experiences of technology-based monitoring of mental health symptoms in the community, British Medical Journal (BMJ Open)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Wierckx, A., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A. (2014). Babywijzer: an application to support women during their pregnancy. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. World Health Organization (2013) Investing in Mental Health: Evidence for Action, Geneva 2013 ISBN: 978 92 4 156461 8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. World Health Organization (2011) mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Yazici, E., Kirkan, T. S., Aslan, P. A., Aydin, N., Yazici, A. B. (2015). Untreated depression in the first trimester of pregnancy leads to postpartum depression: high rates from a natural follow-up study. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment; 11: 405 -- Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Yoo, D., Huldtgren, A, Palzkill Woelfer, J., Hendry, DG, Friedman, B (2013) A Value Sensitive ActionReflection Model: Evolving a Co-Design Space with Stakeholder and Designer Prompts, Proceedings of CHI 2013, ACMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. mHealth for Maternal Mental Health: Everyday Wisdom in Ethical Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader