skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025847acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Honorable Mention

Scratch Community Blocks: Supporting Children as Data Scientists

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present Scratch Community Blocks, a new system that enables children to programmatically access, analyze, and visualize data about their participation in Scratch, an online community for learning computer programming. At its core, our approach involves a shift in who analyzes data: from adult data scientists to young learners themselves. We first introduce the goals and design of the system and then demonstrate it by describing example projects that illustrate its functionality. Next, we show through a series of case studies how the system engages children in not only representing data and answering questions with data but also in self-reflection about their own learning and participation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Harold Abelson and Andrea diSessa. 1986. Turtle Geometry: The Computer as a Medium for Exploring Mathematics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Efthimia Aivaloglou and Felienne Hermans. 2016. How Kids Code and How We Know: An Exploratory Study on the Scratch Repository. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 53--61. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960325 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Scott W Ambler. 2000. Mapping objects to relational databases: What you need to know and why. (July 2000). https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wsmapping-to-rdb/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jana Beck. 2013. iPancreas. (2013). https://github.com/jebeck/iPancreas-archiveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dani Ben-Zvi and Keren Aridor-Berger. 2016. Children's Wonder How to Wander Between Data and Context. In The Teaching and Learning of Statistics: International Perspectives, Dani Ben-Zvi and Katie Makar (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 25--36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--23470-0_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yochai Benkler. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rahul Bhargava and Catherine D'Ignazio. 2015. Designing Tools and Activities for Data Literacy Learners. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marie Bienkowski, Minguy Feng, and Barbara Means. 2012. Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Technical Report. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David Boud, Rosemary Keogh, and David Walker. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience Into Learning. Routledge, NY, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Karen Brennan. 2013. Best of both worlds: Issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school. Ph.D. Dissertation. MA Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jerome S. Bruner. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Richard Catrambone and Mark Guzdial. 2012. Answering Questions with Internet Data: Computational Tools for Social Studies Analysis. (2012). http://swiki.cc.gatech.edu/compfreakGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Community Data Science Collective. 2015. Community Data Science Collective. (2015). http://wiki.communitydata.cc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Drew Conway. 2010. The data science Venn diagram. (2010). http://www.dataists.com/2010/09/the-datascience-venn-diagram/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sayamindu Dasgupta. 2013. From Surveys to Collaborative Art: Enabling Children to Program with Online Data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 28--35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485784 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sayamindu Dasgupta, Shane M. Clements, Abdulrahman Y. Idlbi, Chris Willis-Ford, and Mitch Resnick. 2015. Extending Scratch: New pathways into programming. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, Atlanta, GA, 165--169. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2015.7357212 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Noleine Fitzallen and Jane Watson. 2010. Developing statistical reasoning facilitated by TinkerPlots. In Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS8, July, 2010), Ljubljana, Slovenia., Chris Reading (Ed.). International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hector Gonzalez, Alon Y. Halevy, Christian S. Jensen, Anno Langen, Jayant Madhavan, Rebecca Shapley, Warren Shen, and Jonathan Goldberg-Kidon. 2010. Google fusion tables: web-centered data management and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data (SIGMOD '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1061--1066. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1807167.1807286 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sudheendra Hangal, Monica S. Lam, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. MUSE: Reviving Memories Using Email Archives. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 75--84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047206 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jonathon David Hellmann. 2015. DataSnap: Enabling Domain Experts and Introductory Programmers to Process Big Data in a Block-Based Programming Language. Thesis. Virginia Tech. https: //vtechworks.lib.vt.edu//handle/10919/54544Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Deepak Jagdish. 2014. IMMERSION : a platform for visualization and temporal analysis of email data. Thesis. MA Institute of Technology. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/95606Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Iain Johnstone and Fred Roberts. 2014. Data Science at NSF. Technical Report. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/attachments/129788/public/ Final_StatSNSFJan14.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan Academy. 2013. Introducing...the Learning Dashboard. (Aug. 2013). https://www.khanacademy.org/about/blog/post/ 58354379257/introducingthe-learning-dashboardGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vasiliki Laina and Michelle Wilkerson. 2016. Distributions, Trends, and Contradictions: A Case Study in Sensemaking with Interactive Data Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. The International Society of the Learning Sciences, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Victor Lee. 2013. The Quantified Self (QS) Movement and Some Emerging Opportunities for the Educational Technology Field. Educational Technology November-December 2013 (Oct. 2013), 39--42. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/itls_facpub/480Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. John Maloney, Mitchel Resnick, Natalie Rusk, Brian Silverman, and Evelyn Eastmond. 2010. The Scratch Programming Language and Environment. Trans. Comput. Educ. 10, 4 (Nov. 2010), 16:1--16:15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Fred Martin, Sarah Kuhn, Michelle Scribner-MacLean, Christopher Corcoran, James Dalphond, John Fertitta, Michael McGuiness, Sam Christy, and Ivan Rudnicki. 2010. iSENSE: A Web Environment and Hardware Platform for Data Sharing and Citizen Science. AAAI Spring Symposium Series; 2010 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2010). http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ SSS/SSS10/paper/view/1099Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Andrés Monroy Hernández. 2007. ScratchR: sharing user-generated programmable media. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Interaction design and children (IDC '07). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 167--168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1297277.1297315 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dawn Nafus. 2006. Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc., NY, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Seymour Papert and Idit Harel. 1991. Situating constructionism. In Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, NY, NY, US, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Seymour A. Papert. 1971. Teaching Children to be Mathematicians vs. Teaching About Mathematics. Technical Report 249. MA Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/5837Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jean Piaget. 1970. Genetic epistemology. Trans. E. Duckworth. Columbia University Press, NY, NY, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. John Podesta. 2014. Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values. Technical Report. Executive Office of the President, USA of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hans Poldoja. 2010. EduFeedr - following and supporting learners in open blog-based courses. In Open ED 2010 Proceedings. Barcelona. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/ webapps/o2/handle/10609/4861Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitchel Resnick. 2008. Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology 35, 4 (2008), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, and Yasmin Kafai. 2009. Scratch: Programming for All. Commun. ACM 52, 11 (Nov. 2009), 60--67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Mitchel Resnick and Brian Silverman. 2005. Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC '05). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 117--122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Verónica Rivera-Pelayo, Valentin Zacharias, Lars Müller, and Simone Braun. 2012. Applying Quantified Self Approaches to Support Reflective Learning. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 111--114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330631 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Eric (Eric Ross) Rosenbaum. 2009. Jots : Cultivating reflective learning in Scratch. Thesis. MA Institute of Technology. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/55197Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Donald A Schön. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books, NY, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Benjamin Shapiro, Annie Kelly, Matthew Ahrens, and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2016. BlockyTalky: A Physical and Distributed Computer Music Toolkit for Kids. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Brisbane, Australia. http://research.gold.ac.uk/18635/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarah Van Wart and Tapan S Parikh. 2013. Increasing Youth and Community Agency in GIS. In GeoHCI Workshop at CHI 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Katrien Verbert, Erik Duval, Joris Klerkx, Sten Govaerts, and José Luis Santos. 2013. Learning Analytics Dashboard Applications. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 10 (Oct. 2013), 1500--1509. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479363 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Fernanda B. Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, Frank van Ham, Jesse Kriss, and Matt McKeon. 2007. ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1121--1128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70577 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Fernanda B. Viégas, Scott Golder, and Judith Donath. 2006. Visualizing Email Content: Portraying Relationships from Conversational Histories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 979--988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124919 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Karen E Willcox, Sanjay Sarma, and Philip H Lippel. 2016. Online Education: A Catalyst for Higher Education Reforms. Technical Report. MA Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolfram Research. 2015. Wolfram|Alpha Personal Analytics for Facebook: Last Chance to Analyze Your Friend Network. (April 2015). http://company.wolfram.com/news/2015/ wolframalpha-personal-analytics-for-facebooklast-chance-to-analyze-your-friend-network/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scratch Community Blocks: Supporting Children as Data Scientists

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader