skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025665acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CarVR: Enabling In-Car Virtual Reality Entertainment

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile virtual reality (VR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) allow users to experience highly immersive entertainment whilst being in a mobile scenario. Long commute times make casual gaming in public transports and cars a common occupation. However, VR HMDs can currently not be used in moving vehicles since the car's rotation affects the HMD's sensors and simulator sickness occurs when the visual and vestibular system are stimulated with incongruent information. We present CarVR, a solution to enable VR in moving vehicles by subtracting the car's rotation and mapping vehicular movements with the visual information. This allows the user to actually feel correct kinesthetic forces during the VR experience. In a user study (n = 21), we compared CarVR inside a moving vehicle with the baseline of using VR without vehicle movements. We show that the perceived kinesthetic forces caused by CarVR increase enjoyment and immersion significantly while simulator sickness is reduced compared to a stationary VR experience. Finally, we explore the design space of in-car VR entertainment applications using real kinesthetic forces and derive design considerations for practitioners.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2106-file3.mp4

mp4

26.2 MB

pn2106p.mp4

mp4

3.2 MB

p4034-hock.mp4

mp4

123.5 MB

References

  1. 2016. Developer Center - Documentation and SDKs | Oculus. (2016). https://developer.oculus.com/documentation/intro-vr/latest/concepts/bp_intro/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2016. Lockheed Martin school bus takes you on virtual journey to Mars. (2016). http://generation-beyond.com/mars-experienceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic Retargeting: Dynamic Repurposing of Passive Haptics for Enhanced Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1968--1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. John Bichard, Liselott Brunnberg, Marco Combetto, Anton Gustafsson, and Oskar Juhlin. 2006. Backseat Playgrounds: Pervasive Storytelling in Vast Location Based Games. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 117--122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11872320_14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Willem Bles, Jelte E. Bos, and Hans Kruit. 2000. Motion sickness. Current opinion in neurology 13, 1 (2000), 19--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dipl-Ing Thomas Bock, Prof Dr-Ing Markus Maurer, Dipl-Ing Franciscus van Meel, and Dipl-Ing Thomas Müller. 2008. Vehicle in the Loop. 110, 1 (2008), 10--16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03221943 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Liselott Brunnberg, Oskar Juhlin, and Anton Gustafsson. 2009. Games for Passengers: Accounting for Motion in Location-based Applications. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 26--33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1536513.1536528 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lung-Pan Cheng, Patrick Lühne, Pedro Lopes, Christoph Sterz, and Patrick Baudisch. 2014. Haptic turk: a motion platform based on people. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3463--3472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Francis B. Colavita. 1974. Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 2 (1974), 409--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fabien Danieau, Julien Fleureau, Philippe Guillotel, Nicolas Mollet, Anatole Lecuyer, and Marc Christie. HapSeat: Producing Motion Sensation with Multiple Force-feedback Devices Embedded in a Seat. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (2012) (VRST '12). ACM, 69--76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2407336.2407350 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Albert Einstein and others. 1911. On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light. Annalen der Physik 35, 898--908 (1911), 906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ajoy S. Fernandes and Steven K. Feiner. 2016. Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. James J. Gibson. 2014. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Gabriel Haas, Sebastian Krebs, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. SwiVRChair: A Motorized Swivel Chair to Nudge Users? Orientation for 360 Degree Storytelling in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1996--2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858040 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lawrence J. Hettinger, Kevin S. Berbaum, Robert S. Kennedy, William P. Dunlap, and Margaret D. Nolan. 1990. Vection and simulator sickness. Military Psychology 2, 3 (1990), 171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Makoto Igarashi, F. Owen Black, and Includes Index. 1985. Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium. (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaguar New Zealand. 2015. Jaguar creates Actual Reality prank. (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zpx0Eb1TvoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Eugenia M. Kolasinski. 1995. Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Camille Koppen and Charles Spence. 2007. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Experimental brain research 180, 4 (2007), 737--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. J. W. Lin, H. B. L. Duh, D. E. Parker, H. Abi-Rached, and T. A. Furness. 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Virtual Reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE. 164--171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VR.2002.996519 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Daniel Michaels. 2016. Roller Coasters Ride Into Dizzying Realm of Virtual Reality. (2016). http://goo.gl/qnzsCLGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Akihiro Morimoto, Naoki Isu, Daisuke Ioku, Hitoshi Asano, Atsuo Kawai, and Fumito Masui. 2008. Effects of reading books and watching movies on inducement of car sickness. In Proc. of FISITA 2008 World Automotive Congress, in print.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Oculus VR, LLC. 2016. Virtual Reality Best Practices. (2016). https://docs.unrealengine.com/latest/INT/Platforms/VR/ContentSetup/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. James T. Reason and Joseph John Brand. 1975. Motion sickness. Academic press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Max Rheiner. 2014. Birdly an Attempt to Fly. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 1 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2614066.2614101 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rose Marie Rine, Michael C. Schubert, and Thomas J. Balkany. 1999. Visual-vestibular habituation and balance training for motion sickness. Physical therapy 79, 10 (1999), 949--957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Arnon Rolnick and R. E. Lubow. 1991. Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics 34, 7 (1991), 867--879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. C. Schatzschneider, G. Bruder, and F. Steinicke. 2016. Who turned the clock? Effects of Manipulated Zeitgebers, Cognitive Load and Immersion on Time Estimation. 22, 4 (2016), 1387--1395. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2518137 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Adalberto L. Simeone, Eduardo Velloso, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Substitutional Reality: Using the Physical Environment to Design Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3307--3316. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702389 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mel Slater, John McCarthy, and Francesco Maringelli. 1998. The influence of body movement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40, 3 (1998), 469--477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 3, 2 (1994), 130--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1995. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2, 3 (1995), 201--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Richard H. Y. So, W. T. Lo, and Andy T. K. Ho. 2001. Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43, 3 (2001), 452--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Kay M. Stanney, Kelly S. Hale, Isabelina Nahmens, and Robert S. Kennedy. 2003. What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45, 3 (2003), 504--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Petra Sundström, Axel Baumgartner, Elke Beck, Christine Döttlinger, Martin Murer, Ivana Randelshofer, David Wilfinger, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Gaming to Sit Safe: The Restricted Body As an Integral Part of Gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 715--724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2600882 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mark Turner and Michael J. Griffin. 1999. Motion sickness in public road transport: the relative importance of motion, vision and individual differences. British Journal of Psychology 90, 4 (1999), 519--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Robert Xiao and Hrvoje Benko. 2016. Augmenting the Field-of-View of Head-Mounted Displays with Sparse Peripheral Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1221--1232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CarVR: Enabling In-Car Virtual Reality Entertainment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader