skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025635acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Best Paper

Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider why and how women track their menstrual cycles, examining their experiences to uncover design opportunities and extend the field's understanding of personal informatics tools. To understand menstrual cycle tracking practices, we collected and analyzed data from three sources: 2,000 reviews of popular menstrual tracking apps, a survey of 687 people, and follow-up interviews with 12 survey respondents. We find that women track their menstrual cycle for varied reasons that include remembering and predicting their period as well as informing conversations with healthcare providers. Participants described six methods of tracking their menstrual cycles, including use of technology, awareness of their premenstrual physiological states, and simply remembering. Although women find apps and calendars helpful, these methods are ineffective when predictions of future menstrual cycles are inaccurate. Designs can create feelings of exclusion for gender and sexual minorities. Existing apps also generally fail to consider life stages that women experience, including young adulthood, pregnancy, and menopause. Our findings encourage expanding the field's conceptions of personal informatics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, and Madeline Balaam. (2016). HCI and Intimate Care as an Agenda for Change in Women's Health. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2016), 2599--2611. http://doi.org/bn88 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, Gavin Wood, Dean Saraf, and Madeline Balaam. (2016). On Looking at the Vagina through Labella. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2016), 1810--1821. http://doi.org/bn89 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David Armstrong, Ann Gosling, John Weinman, and Theresa Marteau. (1997). The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study. Sociology, 31(3), 597--606. jstor.org/stable/42855840Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Ed Jenkins, Selina Sutton, and Andrew Garbett. (2015). FeedFinder: A Location-Mapping Mobile Application for Breastfeeding Women. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), 1709--1718. http://doi.org/bn9b Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shaowen Bardzell. (2010). Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), 1301--1310. http://doi.org/d7c545 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. (2011). Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011), 675--684. http://doi.org/dc47ft Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lynn S. Bickley and Peter G. Szilagyi. (2003). Female Genitalia: The Health History: Menarche, Menstruation, Menopause. In Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking (8th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chia-fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean A. Munson. (2016). Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW 2016), 770--786. http://doi.org/bn9c Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sunny Consolvo, David W. McDonald, Tammy Toscos, Mike Y. Chen, Jon Froehlich, Beverly Harrison, Predrag Klasnja, Anthony LaMarca, Louis LeGrand, Ryan Libby, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. (2008). Activity Sensing in the Wild: a Field Trial of UbiFit Garden. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008), 1797--1806. http://doi.org/fj37wd Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Catherine D'Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. (2016). A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke." Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2016). http://doi.org/bn9d Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Arielle Duhaime-Ross. (2014). Apple Promised an Expansive Health App, so Why Can't I Track Menstruation? The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2014/9/25/6844021/apple-promised-an-expansive-health-app-so-why-cant-i-trackGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. (2015). A Lived Informatics Model of Personal Informatics. Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2015), 731--742. http://doi.org/bdsr Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Adam Fourney, Ryen W. White, and Eric Horvitz. (2015). Exploring Time-Dependent Concerns about Pregnancy and Childbirth from Search Logs. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), 737--746. http://doi.org/bn9f Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Susannah Fox and Maeve Duggan. (2013). Tracking for Health. Pew Internet, 1--32. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ian S. Fraser, Hilary O. D. Critchley, Malcolm G. Munro, and Michael Broder. (2007). A Process Designed to Lead to International Agreement on Terminologies and Definitions used to Describe Abnormalities of Menstrual Bleeding. Human Reproduction, 22(3), 635--643. http://doi.org/ddcvtjGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. (2010). The Weirdest People in the World. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61--83--135. http://doi.org/c9j35bGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Karen R. Humes, Nicholas A. Jones, and Roberto R. Ramirez. (2011). Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. USA Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Minal Jain and Pradeep Yammiyavar. (2015). Game Based Learning Tool Seeking Peer Support for Empowering Adolescent Girls in Rural Assam. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2015), 275--278. http://doi.org/bvxh Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Matthew Kay, Dan Morris, m.c. schraefel, and Julie A. Kientz. (2013). There's No Such Thing as Gaining a Pound: Reconsidering the Bathroom Scale User Interface. Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2013), 401--410. http://doi.org/bbdw Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Matthew Kay, Shwetak N. Patel, and Julie A. Kientz. (2015). How Good is 85%?: A Survey Tool to Connect Classifier Evaluation to Acceptability of Accuracy. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2015), 347--356. http://doi.org/bqd5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joseph "Jofish" Kaye, Mary McCuistion, Rebecca Gulotta, and David A. Shamma. (2014). Money Talks: Tracking Personal Finances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), 521--530. http://doi.org/bbdx Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Julie A. Kientz, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Gregory D. Abowd. (2009). Baby Steps: Evaluation of a System to Support Record-Keeping for Parents of Young Children. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), 1713--1722. http://doi.org/dz9vdr Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jennifer L. Kraschnewski, Cynthia H. Chuang, Erika S. Poole, Tamara Peyton, Jaimey Pauli, Alyssa Feher, Madhu Reddy, Ian Blubaugh, Jaimey Pauli, Alyssa Feher, and Madhu Reddy. (2014). Paging Dr. Google: Does Technology Fill the Gap Created by the Prenatal Care Visit Structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study With Pregnant Women. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(6). http://doi.org/bpnbGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Janet Lee and Jennifer Sasser-Coen. (2015). Blood Stories: Menarche and the Politics of the Female Body in Contempary U.S. Society. Routedge.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. (2010). A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), 557--566. http://doi.org/bh8zsb Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. (2011). Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2011), 405--414. http://doi.org/cnsw9k Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Deborah Lupton. (2015). Quantified Sex: a Critical Analysis of Sexual and Reproductive Self-Tracking using Apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440--453. http://doi.org/bpndGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Deborah Lupton and Sarah Pedersen. (2015). An Australian Survey of Women's use of Pregnancy and Parenting Apps. Women and Birth. http://doi.org/bpncGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Meredith Ringel Morris. (2014). Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW 2014), 1272--1282. http://doi.org/bpnf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Titia M. T. Mulders and Thom O. M. Dieben. (2001). Use of the Novel Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring NuvaRing for Ovulation Inhibition. Fertility and Sterility, 75(5), 865--870. http://doi.org/d37b65Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Anita L. Nelson. (2005). Extended-Cycle Oral Contraception: A New Option for Routine Use. Treatments in Endocrinology, 4(3), 139--145. http://doi.org/cpq5knGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Alfredo Perez, Patricio Vela, George S. Masnick, and Robert G. Potter. (1972). First Ovulation after Childbirth: the Effect of Breast-Feeding. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(8), 1041--1047. http://doi.org/bpngGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sarah Perez. Apple Stops Ignoring Women's Health With iOS 9 HealthKit Update, Now Featuring Period Tracking. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/09/apple-stops-ignoring-womens-health-with-ios-9-healthkit-update-now-featuring-period-tracking/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamara Peyton, Erika Poole, Madhu Reddy, Jennifer Kraschnewski, and Cynthia Chuang. (2014). "Every Pregnancy is Different": Designing mHealth Interventions for the Pregnancy Ecology. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2014), 577--586. http://doi.org/bpnh Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. (2014). Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), 1163--1172. http://doi.org/bbdz Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Diana Sanders, Pamela Warner, Torbjöorn Bäckström, John Bancroft, Torbjorn Backstrom, and John Bancroft. (1983). Mood, Sexuality, Hormones and the Menstrual Cycle. I. Changes in Mood and Physical State: Description of Subjects and Method. Psychosomatic Medicine, 45(6), 487--501. http://doi.org/bpnjGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. (2013). The Secret Life of Online Moms: Anonymity and Disinhibition on YouBeMom.com. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2013), 555--562. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM1 3/paper/download/5973/6395Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Katarzyna Stawarz, Anna L. Cox, and Ann Blandford. (2014). Don't Forget Your Pill! Designing Effective Medication Reminder Apps That Support Users' Daily Routines. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), 2269--2278. http://doi.org/bpnk Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Hyewon Suh, John R. Porter, Alexis Hiniker, and Julie A. Kientz. (2014). @BabySteps: Design and Evaluation of a System for Using Twitter for Tracking Children's Developmental Milestones. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), 2279--2288. http://doi.org/bpnn Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Patricia J. Sulak, Thomas J. Kuehl, Mirian Ortiz, and Bobby L. Shull. (2002). Acceptance of Altering the Standard 21-day/7-day Oral Contraceptive Regimen to Delay Menses and Reduce Hormone Withdrawal Symptoms. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(6), 1142--1149. http://doi.org/dxgxmfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Gareth M. Thomas and Deborah Lupton. (2015). Threats and Thrills: Pregnancy Apps, Risk and Consumption. Health, Risk & Society, 17(7-8), 495--509. http://doi.org/bpnpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alan E. Treloar, Ruth E. Boynton, Borghild G. Behn, and Byron W. Brown. (1967). Variation of the Human Menstrual Cycle through Reproductive Life. International Journal of Fertility, 12(1 Pt 2), 77--126. http://doi.org/bzw45mGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Christopher C. Tsai, Gunny Lee, Fred Raab, Gregory J. Norman, Timothy Sohn, William G. Griswold, and Kevin Patrick. (2007). Usability and Feasibility of PmEB: A Mobile Phone Application for Monitoring Real Time Caloric Balance. Mobile Networks and Applications, 12(2-3), 173--184. http://doi.org/bg67bf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Rayoung Yang, Eunice Shin, Mark W. Newman, and Mark S. Ackerman. (2015). When Fitness Trackers Don't "Fit": End-User Difficulties in the Assessment of Personal Tracking Device Accuracy. Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Perasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2015), 623--634. http://doi.org/bpnr Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader