Someone to Read with: Design of and Experiences with an In-Home Learning Companion Robot for Reading

ABSTRACT

The development of literacy and reading proficiency is a building block of lifelong learning that must be supported both in the classroom and at home. While the promise of interactive learning technologies has widely been demonstrated, little is known about how an interactive robot might play a role in this development. We used eight design features based on recommendations from interest-development and human-robot-interaction literatures to design an in-home learning companion robot for children aged 11--12. The robot was used as a technology probe to explore families' (N=8) habits and views about reading, how a reading technology might be used, and how children perceived reading with the robot. Our results indicate reading with the learning companion to be a way to socially engage with reading, which may promote the development of reading interest and ability. We discuss design and research implications based on our findings.

References

1. Mary Ainley, Suzanne Hidi, and Dagmar Berndorff. 2002. Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 3 (2002), 545--561.
2. Sean Andrist, Xiang Zhi Tan, Michael Gleicher, and Bilge Mutlu. 2014. Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In HRI'14. Bielefeld, Germany.
3. Wilma A. Bainbridge, Justin W. Hart, Elizabeth S. Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. The benefits of interactions with physicallly present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 3 (2011), 41--52.
4. Linda Baker, Deborah Scher, and Kirsten Mackler. 1997. Home and family influence on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist 32, 2 (1997), 69--82.
5. Fabiane Benitti. 2012. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education 58 (2012), 978--988.
6. LaVonda Brown, Ryan Kerwin, and Ayanna M. Howard. 2013. Applying behavioral strategies for student engagement using a robotic educational agent. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 4360--4365.
7. Consuelo Cabral-Marquez. 2015. Motivating readers: Helping students set and attain personal reading goals. Reading Teacher 68, 6 (2015), 464--472.
8. Kathy Charmaz and Linda Liska Belgrave. 2012. Qualitative Interviewing and Groudned Theory Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney (Eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 347--366.
9. Michelene T. H. Chi. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of Learning Sciences 6, 3 (1997), 271--315.
10. Linda Crocker and James Algina. 2009. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Cengage, Mason, OH.
11. Brian R. Duffy. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3--4 (2003), 177--190.
12. Paulo Freire and Loretta Slover. 1983. The importance of the act of reading. The Journal of Education 165, 1 (1983), 5--11.
13. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago.
14. Jeonghye Han, Miheon Jo, Sungju Park, and Sungho Kim. 2005. The educational use of home robots for children. In ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. 378--383.
15. Suzanne Hidi and K. Ann Renninger. 2006. The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (2006), 111--127.
16. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackey, Bosse Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stephane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hanson, Nicolas Roussel, Bjorn Eiderback, Sinna Lindquist, and Yngve Sundblad. 2003. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In CHI 2003. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 17--24.
17. Troy Jones and Carol Brown. 2011. Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction 4, 2 (2011), 5--22.
18. Peter H. Kahn Jr., Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Nathan J. Freier, Rachel L. Severson, Brian T. Gill, Jolina H. Ruckert, and Solace Shen. 2012. "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology 48, 2 (2012), 303--314.
19. Sara Kiesler, Aaron Powers, Susan R. Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. 2008. Anthropomorphic interactions with a robot and robot-like agent. Social Cognition 26, 2 (2008), 169--181.
20. Jacqueline Kory and Cynthia Breazeal. 2014. Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children's language development. In 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Edinburgh, 643--648.
21. Andreas Krapp. 1999. Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14, 1 (1999), 23--40.
22. Iolanda Leite, Carlos Martinho, Andre Pereira, and Ana Paiva. 2009. As time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. In The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Toyama, Japan, 367--374.
23. Gi Hyun Lim, Seung Woo Hong, Inhee Lee, Il Hong Suh, and Michael Beetz. 2013. Robot recommender system using affection-based episode ontology for personalization. 155--160.
24. Molly C. Martini, Rabia Murtza, and Eva Wiese. 2015. Minimal physical features required for social robots. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59, 1 (September 2015), 1438--1442.
25. Kathleen McCormick. 1994. The culture of reading and the teaching of English. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
26. Joseph E. Michaelis and Mitchell J. Nathan. 2015. The four-phase interest development in engineering survey. In American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE 2015) Educational Research Methods Division. Seattle, WA.
27. David P. Miller, Illah R. Nourbakhsh, and Roland Siegwart. 2008. Robots for education. In Springer Handbook of Robotics, Bruno Siciliano and Oussama Khatib (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 1283--1298.
28. Mathew Mitchell. 1993. Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 3 (1993), 424--436.
29. Bilge Mutlu. 2011. Designing embodied cues for dialogue with robots. AI Magazine 32, 4 (2011), 17--30.
30. Bilge Mutlu, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jessica Hodgins. 2006. A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 518--523.
31. Bilge Mutlu, Takayuki Kanda, Jodi Forlizzi, Jessica Hodgins, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2012. Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 1, 2 (2012), 12.
32. William Odom, Richard Harper, David Kirk, Sian Lindley, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. Technology heirlooms? Considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials. In CHI 2012. Austin, TX, 337--346.
33. Timothy V. Rasinski. 2003. The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Scholastic, New York.
34. K. Ann Renninger and Suzanne Hidi. 2011. Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist 46, 3 (2011), 168--184.
35. Carol Sansone and Dustin B Thoman. 2005. Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist 103, 3 (2005), 175--186.
36. Samuel Spaulding, Goren Gorden, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2016. Affect-aware student models for robot tutors. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2016). Singapore, 643--648.
37. Fang-Wu Tung. 2016. Child perception of humanoid robot appearance and behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32, 6 (2016), 493--502.
38. Joshua Wainer, David J. Feil-Seifer, Dylan A. Shell, and Maja J. Mataric. 2007. Embodiedment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Jeju, Korea, 872--876.
39. Allan Wigfield and John Guthrie. 1997. Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (1997), 420--432.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)