skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025465acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Environment-Scale Fabrication: Replicating Outdoor Climbing Experiences

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite rapid advances in 3D printing, fabricating large, durable and robust artifacts is impractical with current technology. We focus on a particularly challenging environment-scale artifact: rock climbing routes. We propose a prototype fabrication method to replicate part of an outdoor climbing route and enable the same sensorimotor experience in an indoor gym. We start with 3D reconstruction of the rock wall using multi-view stereo and use reference videos of a climber in action to identify localized rock features that are necessary for ascent. We create 3D models akin to traditional indoor climbing holds, fabricated using rapid prototyping, molding and casting techniques. This results in robust holds accurately replicating the features and configuration of the original rock route. Validation was performed on two rock climbing sites in New Hampshire and Utah. We verified our results by comparing climbers' moves on the indoor replicas and original outdoor routes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1041-file3.mp4

mp4

47.2 MB

pn1041p.mp4

mp4

2.6 MB

References

  1. Harshit Agrawal, Udayan Umapathi, Robert Kovacs, Johannes Frohnhofen, Hsiang-Ting Chen, Stefanie Mueller, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Protopiper: Physically Sketching Room-Sized Objects at Actual Scale. In UIST '15. ACM, 427--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rami Aladdin and Paul G. Kry. 2012. Static Pose Reconstruction with an Instrumented Bouldering Wall. In VRST. 177--184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Louie Anderson. 2004. The Art of Coursesetting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Autodesk. 2016. New Advancements in 3D Printing to Improve Speed and Scale. Online: http://spark.autodesk.com/blog/. (March 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Robert Bogue. 2013. 3D printing: the dawn of a new era in manufacturing? Assembly Automation 33, 4 (2013), 307--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mario Botsch and Leif Kobbelt. An intuitive framework for real-time freeform modeling. In ACM Transactions on Graphics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sofien Bouaziz, Sebastian Martin, Tiantian Liu, Ladislav Kavan, and Mark Pauly. 2014. Projective Dynamics: Fusing Constraint Projections for Fast Simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 154 (July 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Buchroithner. 2002. Creating the virtual Eiger North Face. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Fuhrmann and M. Goesele. 2014. Floating Scale Surface Reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yasutaka Furukawa and Jean Ponce. 2010. Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multi-View Stereopsis. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32, 8 (2010), 1362--1376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michal Jancosek and Tomas Pajdla. 2011. Multi-view reconstruction preserving weakly-supported surfaces. In CVPR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Raine Kajastila and Perttu Hämäaläainen. 2014. Augmented climbing: Interacting with projected graphics on a climbing wall. In CHI'14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Avinash Kalyanaraman, Juhi Ranjan, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2015. Automatic Rock Climbing Route Inference Using Wearables. In UbiComp/ISWC'15. 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Behrokh Khoshnevis. 2004. Automated construction by contour craftingrelated robotics and information technologies. Automation in Construction 13, 1 (2004), 5--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Natalia Kolecka. 2012. High-resolution mapping and visualization of a climbing wall. In True-3D in Cartography.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johannes Kopf, Michael F. Cohen, and Richard Szeliski. 2014. First-person Hyper-lapse videos. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4 (2014), 78:1--78:10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Felix Kosmalla, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krüger. 2015. ClimbSense: Automatic Climbing Route Recognition Using Wrist-worn Inertia Measurement Units. In CHI '15. 2033--2042.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Felix Kosmalla, Frederik Wiehr, Florian Daiber, Antonio Krüger, and Markus Löchtefeld. 2016. ClimbAware: Investigating Perception and Acceptance of Wearables in Rock Climbing. In CHI '16. ACM, 1097--1108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. TD Koukoubis, LW Cooper, RR Glisson, AV Seaber, and JA Feagin Jr. 1995. An electromyographic study of arm muscles during climbing. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3, 2 (1995), 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cassim Ladha, Nils Y Hammerla, Patrick Olivier, and Thomas Plötz. 2013. ClimbAX: skill assessment for climbing enthusiasts. In UbiComp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sergey Levine, Christian Theobalt, and Vladlen Koltun. 2009. Real-time Prosody-driven Synthesis of Body Language. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, Article 172 (Dec. 2009), 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Matyas Luzan. 2015. On the Path to Action Directe 9a. Online: http://luzanmatyas.blogspot.com/. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonas Pfeil, Jun Mitani, and Takeo Igarashi. 2011. Interactive climbing route design using a simulated virtual climber. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2011 Sketches. ACM, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Caleb Phillips, Lee Becker, and Elizabeth Bradley. 2011. Strange Beta: An Assistance System for Indoor Rock Climbing Route Setting Using Chaotic Variations and Machine Learning. CoRR abs/1110.0532 (2011). http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0532Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Simnacher, R. Spoerri, G. Rauter, R. Riener, and P. Wolf. 2012. Development and Application of a Dynamometric System for Sport Climbing. Journal of Biomechanics (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Carsten Stoll, Nils Hasler, Juergen Gall, Hans-Peter Seidel, and Christian Theobalt. 2011. Fast articulated motion tracking using a sums of gaussians body model. In ICCV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hironori Yoshida, Takeo Igarashi, Yusuke Obuchi, Yosuke Takami, Jun Sato, Mika Araki, Masaaki Miki, Kosuke Nagata, Kazuhide Sakai, and Syunsuke Igarashi. 2015. Architecture-scale Human-assisted Additive Manufacturing. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4 (July 2015), 88:1--88:8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Environment-Scale Fabrication: Replicating Outdoor Climbing Experiences

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader