Falk Böschen
ABSTRACT
Bar charts are widely used to visualize core results of experiments in research papers or display statistics in news, media, and other reports. However, visualizations like bar charts are mostly manually designed, static presentations of data without the option of adaption to a user's needs. But so far, it is unknown whether interactivity improves the understanding of charts. In this work, we compare static with dynamic bar charts, which offer an interactive stacking option. We assess the efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction when answering questions regarding the content of a bar chart. An eye-tracker is used to measure the efficiency. We have conducted a between group experiment with 38 participants. While one group had to solve the aggregation tasks using stackable, i.e., interactive bar charts, the other group was limited to static visualizations. Even though new interactive features require familiarization, we found that the stacking feature significantly helps completing the tasks with respect to efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction for bar charts of varying complexity.
- W. Abell, C. Churcher, and J. Lee. An evaluation of interactive stacked bar charts. IJCAT, 34(4):285--290, 2009. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Burch, N. Konevtsova, J. Heinrich, M. Hoeferlin, and D. Weiskopf. Evaluation of traditional, orthogonal, and radial tree diagrams by an eye tracking study. IEEE TVCG, 17(12):2440--2448, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Gediga, K. Hamborg, and I. Düntsch. The isometrics usability inventory: An operationalization of ISO 9241--10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems. Behaviour & IT, 18(3):151--164, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. H. Goldberg and X. P. Kotval. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. In International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, volume 24, pages 631--645, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Kim and L. J. Lombardino. Comparing graphs and text: Effects of complexity and task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(3), 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Pinker. A theory of graph comprehension. In R. O. Freedle, editor, Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, chapter 4, pages 73--126. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, England, 1990.Google Scholar
- T. Walber, A. Scherp, and S. Staab. Benefiting from users' gaze: selection of image regions from eye tracking information for provided tags. Multimedia Tools Appl., 71(1):363--390, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Evaluation of the Comprehensiveness of Bar Charts with and without Stacking Functionality using Eye-Tracking
Recommendations
Neighborhood Perception in Bar Charts
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we report three user experiments that investigate in how far the perception of a bar in a bar chart changes based on the height of its neighboring bars. We hypothesized that the perception of the very same bar, for instance, might differ ...
An evaluation of interactive stacked bar charts
Interactivity is considered an important feature of visualisation software. This paper evaluates the addition of simple interactive features to the display of stacked bar charts. These features allow the user to move different data series onto the chart ...
Hierarchical Pixel Bar Charts
Simple presentation graphics are intuitive and easy-to-use, but only show highly aggregated data. Bar charts, for example, only show a rather small number of data values and x-y-plots often have a high degree of overlap. Presentation techniques are ...
Comments