ABSTRACT
Email continues to be an important form of communication as well as a way to manage tasks and archive personal information. As the volume of email grows, organizing and finding relevant email remains challenging. In this paper, we present a large-scale log analysis of the activities that people perform on email mes-sages (accessing external information via links or attachments, responding to messages, and organizing messages), their search behavior, and their organizational practices in a popular web email client.
First, we characterize general email activities as well as activities associated with search. We find that within search sessions, peo-ple are more likely to access information and respond to messag-es but less likely to organize. Second, we examine the relation-ship between characteristics of a person's mailbox and their search and organizational practices. People with larger mailboxes tend to organize more, respond a little more, and access infor-mation less. People with larger mailboxes and folder structures search more, but the number of folders has less influence on search. Third, we extend previous work on email organization (e.g., filers vs. pilers; cleaners vs. keepers) by examining the extent to which these strategies are evident in our large-scale analysis and influence email activities and search. People who rely heavily on one organizational strategy tend to use others less. People who organize less tend to search more. Finally, we de-scribe how these insights can influence the design of email search.
- N. Ailon, Z.S. Karnin, E. Liberty and Y. Maarek. Threading machine generated email. In Proceedings of WSDM 2013. 405--414. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Bälter. Keystroke level analysis of email message organization. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, 105--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Capra, J. Khanova and S. Ramdeen. Work and email email use by university employees: PIM practices across do-main boundaries. JASIST, 64(5), 2013, 1029--1044.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Carmel, G. Halawai, L. Lewin-Eyan, Y. Maarek and A. Raviv. Rank by time or by relevance? In Proceedings of CIKM 2015, 283--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M.E. Cecchinato, A. Sellen, M. Shokouhi and G. Smyth. Finding email in a multi-account, multi-device world. In Proceedings of CHI 2016, 1200--1210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. A. Dabbish and R. E. Kraut. Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. In Proceedings CSCW 2006, 431--440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Di Castro, Z. Karnin, L. Lewin-Eytan and Y. Maarek. You've got mail, and here is what you can do with it! Ana-lyzing and predicting actions on email messages. In Proceedings of WSDM 2016, 307--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, J. J. Cadiz, G. Jancke, R. Sarin and D. C. Robbins. Stuff I've Seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2003, 72--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Elsweiler and I. Ruthven. Towards task-based personal information management evaluations. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2007, 23--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Elsweiler, M. Harvey and M. Hacker. Understanding Re-finding Behavior in Naturalistic Email Interaction Logs. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2011, 35--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Fisher, A. Brush, E. Gleave and M. A. Smith. Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner's email overload ten years later. In Proceedings of CSCW 2006, 309--312. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Grbovic, G. Halawi, Z. Karni and Y. Maarek. How many folders do you really need?: Classifying email into a handful of categories. In Proceedings of CIKM 2014, 869--878. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Grevet, D. Choi, D. Kumar and E. Gilbert. Overload is overloaded: email in the age of Gmail. In Proceedings of CHI 2014, 793--802. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Gwizdka. TaskView: Design and evaluation of a task-based email interface. In Proceedings of CASCON 2002, 136--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Gwizdka. Reinventing the inbox: Supporting the management of pending tasks in email. In Proceedings of CHI 2002, 550--551. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Gwizdka. Email task management styles: the cleaners and the keepers. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, 1235--1238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Harvey and D. Elsweiler. Exploring query patterns in email search. In Proceedings of ECIR 2012, 25--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Henderson and A. Srinivasan. Filing, piling and structuring: Strategies for personal document management. In Proceedings of HICSS 2011, 468--477. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Jerejian, C. Reid and C. Rees. The contribution of email volume, email management strategies and propensity to worry in predicting email stress among academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 2013, 991--996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y.M. Kalman and G. Rivaid. Filing, piling, and everything in between: The dynamics of e-mail inbox management. JASIST, 66 (12), 2015, 2540--2552. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Koren, E. Liberty, Y. Maarek and R. Sandler. Automatically tagging email by leveraging other users' folders. In Proceedings SIGKDD 2011, 913--921. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Krishnan and S. Jones. TimeSpace: Activity-based temporal visualisation of personal information spaces. In Proceedings of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 9, 2005, 46--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Kristen and R. Lee. Email and the internet are the dominant technological tools in American workplaces. Pew Research Center, December 2014.Google Scholar
- A. Qadir, M. Gamon, P. Pantel and A. H. Awadallah. Activity modeling in email. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, 1452--1462.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Radicati and Q. Hoang. Email statistics report 2012--2016. The Radicati Group, Inc.Google Scholar
- M. Sappelli, G. Pasi, S. Verberne, M. de Boer and W. Kraaij. Assessing e-mail intent and tasks in email messages. Information Sciences, 358, 2016, 1--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Smith, Y. Rogers and M. Underwood. Managing personal and work email in the same box: Overcoming the tensions through new metaphors. In Proceedings of HOIT 2003.Google Scholar
- S. Whittaker, T. Matthews, J. Cerruti, H. Badenes and J. Tang. Am I wasting my time organizing email?: A study of email refinding. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, 3449--3458. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Whittaker and C. Sidner. Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proceedings of CHI 1996, 276--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Large-Scale Analysis of Email Search and Organizational Strategies
Recommendations
Understanding and Modeling Success in Email Search
SIGIR '17: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalEmail has been a dominant form of communication for many years, and email search is an important problem. In contrast to other search setting, such as web search, there have been few studies of user behavior and models of email search success. Research ...
Characterizing Email Search using Large-scale Behavioral Logs and Surveys
WWW '17: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide WebAs the number of email users and messages continues to grow, search is becoming more important for finding information in personal archives. In spite of its importance, email search is much less studied than web search, particularly using large-scale ...
Rethinking email message and people search
WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide webWe show how a number of novel email search features can be implemented without any kind of natural language processing (NLP) or advanced data mining. Our approach inspects the email headers of all messages a user has ever sent or received and it creates ...
Comments