Creativity in Authentic STEAM Education with EarSketch

ABSTRACT

STEAM education is a method for driving student engagement in STEM topics through personal expression, creativity and aesthetics. EarSketch, a collaborative and authentic learning tool which introduces students to programming through music remixing, has previously been shown to enhance student engagement and intent to persist in computing. The goal of EarSketch is to broaden participation in computing through a thickly authentic learning environment that has personal and real world relevance in both computational and music domains. This mixed methods study extends previous work by 1) using a newly- developed instrument to assess creativity and 2) testing a theory of change model that provides an explanatory framework for increasing student engagement in STEAM. The results suggest that students who used EarSketch express statistically significant gains in computing attitudes and creativity. Furthermore, a series of multiple regression analyses found that a creative learning environment, fueled by a meaningful and personally relevant EarSketch curriculum, drives improvements in students' attitudes and intent to persist in computing. This work makes a significant contribution to computer science education by establishing the effectiveness of an authentic STEAM curriculum and advancing our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms driving students' motivations to persist in STEM disciplines.

References

1. Amabile, T.M. 1990. Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity and beyond. In Theories of Creativity, M.A. Runco and R.S. Albert. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 61--90.
2. Annie E. Casey Foundation and Organizational Research Services. 2004. Theory of Change: A practical tool for action, results and learning. Retrieved March 3, 2016 from: http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-theoryofchange-2004.pdf
3. Carifio, J., and Perla, R. 2007. Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response format and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 106--11.
4. Carifio, J., and Perla, R. 2008. Resolving the 5-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150--1152.
5. Carroll, E.A., Latulipe, C. Fung, R., and Terry, M. 2009. Creativity factor evaluation: Towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and Cognition (Berkeley, Cailifornia, October 27-30, 2009). C&C '09. ACM, New York, NY, 127--136.
6. Cohen, J. 1988.). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
7. College Board. 2016. AP Computer Science Principles Curriculum Framework Accessed March 3, 2016 from https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-computer-science-principles-course-and-exam-description.pdf
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Collins, New York, NY, 107--126.
9. Cuny, J. 2011. Address to the Computer Science Community. Presented at The CE21 PI and Community Meeting (New Orleans, Louisiana, January 21, 2011).
10. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science, What Works Clearinghouse. 2014. What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and Standards Handbook Version 3.0 (Mar. 2014). Retrieved March 3, 2016 from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
11. Field, A.P. 2009. Discovering Statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
12. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13. Freeman, J., Magerko, B., McKlin, T., Reily, M., Permar, J. Summers, C., and Fruchter, E. 2014. Engaging underrepresented groups in high school introductory computing through computational remixing with EarSketch. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (Atlanta, Georgia, March 05-08, 2014). SIGCSE'14. ACM, New York, NY, 85--90.
14. Harel, I. and Papert, S. 1991. Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation, New York, NY.
15. Henriksen, D. 2014. Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal. 1, 2 (Feb. 2014), Article 15.
16. Howard, K.A.S., Carlstrom, A.H., Katz, A.D., Chew, A.Y., Ray, G.C., Laine, L., and Callum, D. 2011. Career aspirations of youth: Untangling race/ethnicity, SES, and gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 79, 1 (Aug. 2011), 98--109.
17. Knezek, G. and Christensen, R. 1996. Validating the Computer Attitude Questionnaire (CAQ). Presented at Annual Meeting of the Southwest Education Research Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, January 26, 1996). AMSERA'96.
18. Lee, H.S., and Butler, N. 2003. Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education. 25, 8 (2003), 923--948.
19. Lee, F.A., Lewis, R.K., Sly, J.R., Carmack, C., Roberts, S.R., and Basore, P. 2011. Promoting positive youth development by examining the career and educational aspirations of African American males: Implications for designing education programs. Journal of Prevention and Intervention Community. 39, 4 (Oct. 2011), 299--309.
20. Lord, F.M. 1952. The relation of the reliability of multiple-choice tests to the distribution of item difficulties. Psychometrika. 17, 2 (Jun. 1952), 181--194.
21. Margolis, J. 2013. Unlocking the Clubhouse: A decade later and now what? In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, March 06-09, 2013). SIGCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 9--10.
22. Magerko, B., Freeman, J., McKlin, T., McCoid, S., Jenkins, T., and Livingston, E. 2013. Tackling engagement in in computing with computational music remixing. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Denver, Colorado, March 06-09, 2013). SIGCSE'13. ACM, New York, NY, 657--662.
23. Maeda, J. 2013. STEM + Art=STEAM. The STEAM Journal. 1, 1 (Mar. 2013), Article 34.
24. Mayer, R.E. 1999. Fifty years of Creativity Research. In Handbook of Creativity, R.J. Sternberg. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 449--460.
25. McKenzi, D. 2011. Power Calculations for Propensity Score Matching. (Nov. 2011). Retrieved March 3, 2016 from http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/power-calculations-for-propensity-score-matching
26. Murray, J. 2014. Likert data: what to use, parametric or non-parametric. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4, 258--264.
27. National Science Foundation. 2013. Science and engineering Degrees: 1996--2010. Retrieved March 25, 2016 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf13327/content.cfm?pub_id=4266&id=2
28. Norman, G. 2010. Likert scales, level of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15, 625--632.
29. Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
30. Peppler, K., Santo, R., Gresalfi, M., and Salen, K. 2014. Script Changers: Digital Storytelling with Scratch. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Ma.
31. Rogers, C. 1976. Toward a Theory of Creativity. In The Creativity Question, Rothenberg, A. and Hausman. C.R. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
32. Rusticus, S.A., and Lovato, C.Y. 2014. Impact of sample size and variability on the power and type I error rates of equivalence tests: A simulation study. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19, 11.
33. Shaffer, D.W., and Resnick, M. 1999. Thick Authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interact. Learn. Res. 10, 2, 195--215.
34. Sobel, M. 1987. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociological Methods Research. 16, 1 (Aug. 1987), 155--176.
35. Webb, N.L. 2002. An analysis of the alignment between mathematics standards and assessments for three states. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, April 01-05, 2002).
36. Wiebe, E., Williams, L., Yang, K., and Miller, C. 2003. Computer science attitude survey. Comput. Scie. 14.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Arts and humanities

  • Education

• General and reference

  • Cross-computing tools and techniques

    • Design

    • Empirical studies

    • Evaluation

    • Measurement

    • Reliability

  • Document types

    • General literature

    • Surveys and overviews

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • K-12 education