skip to main content
10.1145/3014812.3014871acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding chronic disease comorbidities from baseline networks: knowledge discovery utilising administrative healthcare data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hospitals routinely collect admitted patients' data for administrative purposes and for reporting to the government and health insurers. These heterogeneous and mostly untapped data contain rich semantic information about patients' health conditions in the form of standard disease codes. These traces of clinical information can be aggregated over patients to understand how their health progresses over time. When applied on particular chronic disease patients, this approach can potentially help in understanding chronic disease comorbidities as well as in the knowledge discovery on how the chronic disease progresses over time. In this paper, we propose a network-based approach to extract semantic information from hospital administrative data in order to develop a representation of chronic disease progression specifically - type 2 diabetes. We then propose measures for attribution adjustment that ranks the more prevalent comorbidities in chronic patients higher, compared to the non-chronic ones. We also have applied the framework on the administrative data of 2,760 sampled patients to understand how diabetes progresses over time through different comorbidities. This understanding can be effectively converted to actionable intelligence that can be useful in the formulation of better health policy and resource management.

References

  1. World Health Organization, 2012. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. Geneva: WHO, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ward, B., Schiller, J., and Goodman, R., 2014. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev. Chronic Dis. 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2014. Australia's Health 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kopelman, P.G., 2000. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404, 6778, 635--643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rathmann, W., Haastert, B., Icks, A.a., Löwel, H., Meisinger, C., Holle, R., and Giani, G., 2003. High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Southern Germany: target populations for efficient screening. The KORA survey 2000. Diabetologia 46, 2, 182--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gregg, E.W., Cadwell, B.L., Cheng, Y.J., Cowie, C.C., Williams, D.E., Geiss, L., Engelgau, M.M., and Vinicor, F., 2004. Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the US. Diabetes Care 27, 12, 2806--2812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Taubert, G., Winkelmann, B.R., Schleiffer, T., März, W., Winkler, R., Gök, R., Klein, B., Schneider, S., and Boehm, B.O., 2003. Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of unrecognized diabetes mellitus in 3266 patients scheduled for coronary angiography. Am. Heart J. 145, 2, 285--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. MacKenzie, E.J., Morris Jr, J.A., and Eeelstein, S.L., 1989. Effect of pre-existing disease on length of hospital stay in trauma patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 29, 6, 757--765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Umpierrez, G.E., Isaacs, S.D., Bazargan, N., You, X., Thaler, L.M., and Kitabchi, A.E., 2002. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 87, 3, 978--982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lauruschkat, A.H., Arnrich, B., Albert, A.A., Walter, J.A., Amann, B., Rosendahl, U.P., Alexander, T., and Ennker, J., 2005. Prevalence and risks of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 112, 16, 2397--2402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tenenbaum, A., Motro, M., Fisman, E.Z., Boyko, V., Mandelzweig, L., Reicher-Reiss, H., Graff, E., Brunner, D., and Behar, S., 2000. Clinical impact of borderline and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease. The American journal of cardiology 86, 12, 1363--1366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kapur, V., Sandblom, R.E., Hert, R., James, B., and Sean, D., 1999. The medical cost of undiagnosed sleep apnea. Sleep 22, 6, 749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harris, M.I., 1993. Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues. Diabetes Care 16, 4, 642--652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Khan, A., Uddin, S., and Srinivasan, U., 2016. Adapting graph theory and social network measures on healthcare data: a new framework to understand chronic disease progression. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference ACM, 66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Charlson, M.E., Pompei, P., Ales, K.L., and MacKenzie, C.R., 1987. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 40, 5, 373--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D.R., and Coffey, R.M., 1998. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med. Care 36, 1, 8--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sharabiani, M.T., Aylin, P., and Bottle, A., 2012. Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data. Med. Care 50, 12, 1109--1118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wong, D.T. and Knaus, W.A., 1991. Predicting outcome in critical care: the current status of the APACHE prognostic scoring system. Can. J. Anaesth. 38, 3, 374--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Breslow, M.J. and Badawi, O., 2012. Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1---interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems. CHEST Journal 141, 1, 245--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Barabási, A.-L., 2007. Network medicine---from obesity to the "diseasome". N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 4, 404--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Loscalzo, J., Kohane, I., and Barabasi, A.L., 2007. Human disease classification in the postgenomic era: a complex systems approach to human pathobiology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Burton, P.R., Clayton, D.G., Cardon, L.R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D.P., McCarthy, M.I., Ouwehand, W.H., and Samani, N.J., 2007. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447, 7145, 661--678.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hidalgo, C.A., Blumm, N., Barabási, A.-L., and Christakis, N.A., 2009. A dynamic network approach for the study of human phenotypes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, 4, e1000353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Ideker, T. and Sharan, R., 2008. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res. 18, 4, 644--652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Davis, D.A., Chawla, N.V., Christakis, N.A., and Barabási, A.-L., 2010. Time to CARE: a collaborative engine for practical disease prediction. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 20, 3, 388--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Davis, D.A., Chawla, N.V., Blumm, N., Christakis, N., and Barabási, A.-L., 2008. Predicting individual disease risk based on medical history. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management ACM, 769--778. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Breault, J.L., Goodall, C.R., and Fos, P.J., 2002. Data mining a diabetic data warehouse. Artif. Intell. Med. 26, 1, 37--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Baglioni, M., Pieroni, S., Geraci, F., Mariani, F., Molinaro, S., Pellegrini, M., and Lastres, E., 2013. A New Framework for Distilling Higher Quality Information from Health Data via Social Network Analysis. In Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on IEEE, 48--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Anderson, J.G., 2002. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 32, 3, 179--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. World health Organization, 2014. WHO | International Classification of Diseases (ICD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Luijks, H., Schermer, T., Bor, H., van Weel, C., Lagro-Janssen, T., Biermans, M., and de Grauw, W., 2012. Prevalence and incidence density rates of chronic comorbidity in type 2 diabetes patients: an exploratory cohort study. BMC Med. 10, 1, 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Folino, F., Pizzuti, C., and Ventura, M., 2010. A comorbidity network approach to predict disease risk. In Information Technology in Bio-and Medical Informatics, ITBAM 2010 Springer, 102--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Fetter, R.B., Shin, Y., Freeman, J.L., Averill, R.F., and Thompson, J.D., 1980. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med. Care, i--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Quan, H., Sundararajan, V., Halfon, P., Fong, A., Burnand, B., Luthi, J.-C., Saunders, L.D., Beck, C.A., Feasby, T.E., and Ghali, W.A., 2005. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med. Care, 1130--1139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Garland, A., Fransoo, R., Olafson, K., Ramsey, C., Yogendren, M., Chateau, D., and McGowan, K., 2012. The epidemiology and outcomes of critical illness in Manitoba. University of Manitoba, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. American Diabetes Association, 2013. Kidney Disease (Nephropathy). In Living With Diabetes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. National Heart, L., and Blood Institute, 2015. Who Is at Risk for Heart Valve Disease? In Heart Valve Diseases.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Benjamin, E.J., Levy, D., Vaziri, S.M., D'Agostino, R.B., Belanger, A.J., and Wolf, P.A., 1994. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 271, 11, 840--844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding chronic disease comorbidities from baseline networks: knowledge discovery utilising administrative healthcare data

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ACSW '17: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
            January 2017
            615 pages
            ISBN:9781450347686
            DOI:10.1145/3014812

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 31 January 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ACSW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate78of156submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate204of424submissions,48%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader