skip to main content
10.1145/3010915.3010988acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Sleep tracking in the real world: a qualitative study into barriers for improving sleep

Published:29 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wearable devices like Fitbit and Apple Watch provide convenient access to personal information about sleep habits. However, it is unclear if awareness of one's sleep habits also translates into improved sleep. Hence, we conducted an interview study with 12 people who track their sleep with Fitbit devices to investigate if they have managed to improve their sleep and to examine potential barriers for improving sleep. The participants reported increased awareness of sleep habits, but none of the participants managed to improve their sleep. They faced three barriers in improving their sleep: (1) not knowing what is normal sleep, (2) not being able to diagnose the reasons for a lack of sleep, and (3) not knowing how to act. This paper discusses how to address these barriers, both conceptually as well through design considerations - reference points, connections to lifestyle data, and personalised recommendations - to help users gain improvements in wellbeing from their personal data.

References

  1. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Choe, E.K., Consolvo, S., Watson, N.F. and Kientz, J.A. Opportunities for computing technologies to support healthy sleep behaviors. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 3053--3062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Choe, E.K., Lee, B., Kay, M., Pratt, W. and Kientz, J.A. SleepTight: low-burden, self-monitoring technology for capturing and reflecting on sleep behaviors. In Proc. UbiComp 2015, ACM (2015), 121--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cordeiro, F., Bales, E., Cherry, E. and Fogarty, J. Rethinking the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture. In Proc. CHI 2015, ACM (2015), 3207--3216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dijk, D.J. and von Schantz, M. Timing and consolidation of human sleep, wakefulness, and performance by a symphony of oscillators. Journal of Biological Rhythms 20, 4 (2005), 279--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Evenson, K.R., Goto, M.M. and Furberg, R.D. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 12, 1 (2015), 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fox, S. and Duggan, M. Tracking for Health. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2013, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritz, T., Huang, E.M., Murphy, G.C. and Zimmermann, T. Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM (2014), 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S. and Pratt, W. How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research, In CHI 2011.ACM, (2011), 3063--3072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kolla, B.P., Mansukhani, S. and Mansukhani, M.P. Consumer sleep tracking devices: a review of mechanisms, validity and utility. Expert Review of Medical Devices 13, 5 (2016), 497--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lawson, S., Jamison-Powell, S., Garbett, A., Linehan, C., Kucharczyk, E., Verbaan, S., Rowland, D.A. and Morgan, K. Validating a mobile phone application for the everyday, unobtrusive, objective measurement of sleep. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM (2013), 2497--2506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Li, I., Dey, A. and Forlizzi, J. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liang, Z., Alberto, M., Chapa Martell, M.A. and Nishimura, T. Mining hidden correlations between sleep and lifestyle factors from quantified-self data. In Adjunct Proc. Ubicomp/ISWC 2016 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Liu, W., Ploderer, B. and Hoang, T. In bed with technology: challenges and opportunities for sleep tracking. In Proc. OzCHI 2015, ACM (2015), 142--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lupton, D. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In Proc. OzCHI 2014, ACM (2014), 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Min, J.-K., Doryab, A., Wiese, J., Amini, S., Zimmerman, J. and Hong, J.I. Toss 'n' turn: smartphone as sleep and sleep quality detector. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM (2014), 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A. and Chalmers, M.C. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. In Proc. CHI 2014 (2014), 1163--1172 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shirazi, A.S., Clawson, J., Hassanpour, Y., Tourian, M.J., Schmidt, A., Chi, E.H., Borazio, M. and Laerhoven, K. V. Already up? using mobile phones to track & share sleep behavior. Internation Journal Human-Computer Studies 71, 9 (2013), 878--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Smith, W., Wadley, G., Webber, S., Ploderer, B. and Lederman, R. Unbounding the interaction design problem: the contribution of HCI in three interventions for well-being. In Proc. OZCHI 2014, ACM (2014), 392--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wolf, G. The quantified self. TED (2010), Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiao, M., Yan, H., Song, J., Yang, Y. and Yang, X. Sleep stages classification based on heart rate variability and random forest. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 8, 6 (2013), 624--633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Sleep tracking in the real world: a qualitative study into barriers for improving sleep

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
      November 2016
      706 pages
      ISBN:9781450346184
      DOI:10.1145/3010915

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader