Voluntary participation in discussion forums as an engagement indicator: an empirical study of teaching first-year programming

ABSTRACT

Computer programming is a required skill for most STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) students. However, teaching novices programming has long been considered a big challenge by computer science educators as manifested by the observation that first-year programming topics tend to have a higher failure rate than other first-year topics. Existing studies have discovered that lack of engagement in learning programming is a key determinant of a student's poor performance. Therefore, it is beneficial to perceive a student's lack of engagement so that appropriate actions can be taken ahead of time. However, first year topics especially programming topics usually have very large enrolments, making it hard for a lecturer to keep track of each individual student's engagement level. As learning management systems (LMS) have been widely adopted by universities, in this paper we suggest using a student's voluntary participation in a programming topic's discussion forum provided by LMS as an engagement indicator so that the lecturer can constantly monitor and re-engage those who present low or no engagement. This recommendation is based on an empirical study of a first-year programming topic that reveals a positive correlation between one's voluntary participation in peer interaction through the topic's discussion forum and one's learning outcome in the topic.

References

1. Agresti, A. (2002). "Logit models for multinomial responses." Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition: 267--313.
2. Bennedsen, J. and Caspersen, M. E. (2007). "Failure rates in introductory programming." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39(2): 32--36.
3. Brooks, R. (1977). "Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming." International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 9(6): 737--751.
4. Butler, M. and Morgan, M. (2007). "Learning challenges faced by novice programming students studying high level and low feedback concepts." Proc. ASCILITE Singapore: 99--107.
5. Brooks, R. (1977). "Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming." International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 9(6): 737--751.
6. Butler, M. and Morgan, M. (2007). "Learning challenges faced by novice programming students studying high level and low feedback concepts." Proc. ASCILITE Singapore: 99--107.
7. Byrne, P. and Lyons, G. (2001). "The effect of student attributes on success in programming." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 33(3):49--52.
8. Caspersen, M. E. and Kolling, M. (2009). "STREAM: A first programming process." ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 9(1): 4.
9. de Raadt, M., Hamilton, M. et al. (2005). "Approaches to learning in computer programming students and their effect on success." Proc. The 28th HERDSA Annual Conference: 407--414.
10. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. et al. (2011). "Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices." New media & society 13(6):873--892.
11. Ford, M. and Venema, S. (2010). "Assessing the success of an introductory programming course." Journal of Information Technology Education 9(1): 133--145.
12. Gomes, A. J., Santos, A. N. et al. (2012). "A study on students' behaviours and attitudes towards learning to program." Proc. 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education: 132--137.
13. Gries, D. (1974). What should we teach in an introductory programming course?" ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 6(1): 81--89.
14. Hockings, C., Cooke, S. et al. (2008). "Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities." Research Papers in Education 23(2): 191--201.
15. Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A. (1999). "Nonparametric statistical methods." J Wiley New York.
16. Huggard, M. (2004). Programming trauma: Can it be avoided." Proc. BCS Grand Challenges in Computing: Education: 50--51.
17. Jenkins, T. (2002). "On the difficulty of learning to program." Proc. The 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences.
18. Lau, W. W. and Yuen, A. H. (2011). "Modelling programming performance: Beyond the influence of learner characteristics." Computers & Education 57(1): 1202--1213.
19. Ma, L., Ferguson, J. et al. (2007). "Investigating the viability of mental models held by novice programmers." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39(1): 499--503.
20. Malhotra, N. (2013). "Experimenting with Facebook in the college classroom." Faculty Focus.
21. McCracken, M., Almstrum, V. et al. (2001). "A multinational, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 33(4): 125--180.
22. McGettrick, A., Boyle, R. et al. (2005). "Grand Challenges in Computing: Education---A Summary." The Computer Journal 48(1): 42--48.
23. McGettrick, A. D. (2004). "Grand challenges in computing: Education." British Computer Society.
24. Nandi, D., Hamilton, M. et al. (2015). "Investigation of participation and quality of online interaction." International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 7(8): 25.
25. Robins, A., Rountree, J. et al. (2003). "Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion." Computer Science Education 13(2): 137--172.
26. Roddan, M. (2002). "The determinants of student failure and attrition in first year computing science." Computing Science, Glasgow University, project Summer.
27. Ross, C., Orr, E. S. et al. (2009). "Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use." Computers in Human Behaviour 25(2): 578--586.
28. Shih, R.-C. (2011). "Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27(5): 829--845.
29. Shneiderman, B. and Mayer R. (1979). "Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behaviour: A model and experimental results." International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences 8(3): 219--238.
30. Soloway, E. and Spohrer, J. C. (1989). "Studying the Novice Programmer." Erlbaum Associates.
31. Clear, T., Edwards, J. et al. (2008). "The Teaching of Novice Computer Programmers: Bringing the Scholarly Research Approach to Australia." Proc. The 10th conference on Australasian Computing Education: 63--68.
32. Tracz, W. J. (1979). "Computer programming and the human thought process." Software: Practice and Experience 9(2): 127--137.
33. Walsh, K. (2012). "Can social media play a role in improving retention in higher education? research says it can." EmergingEdTech.
34. Wu, P. and Hsu, L. (2011). "EFL learning on social networking site?: An action research on Facebook." Teaching & Learning with Vision Conference.
35. Xia, C., Fielder, J. et al. (2013). "Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study." Issues in Educational Research 23(1): 97--113.