ABSTRACT
Everyday eating and drinking experiences involve multiple, interrelated, sensory inputs. However, when it comes to human-food interaction design (HFI) research, certain senses have received more attention than others have. Here, we focus on audition, a sense that has received limited attention in such context. In particular, we highlight the role of food/drink-related eating sounds, as a potential input for human-food interaction design. We review some of the few systems that have built on such sounds within food and drink contexts. We also present a multisensory design framework and discuss how the systematic connections that exist between the senses may provide some guidelines for the integration of eating sounds in HFI design. Finally, we present some key prospects that we foresee for research in technology design in HFI.
- Auvray, M. and Spence, C. 2008. The multisensory perception of flavor. Conscious. Cogn. 17(3), 1016--1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spence, C. 2015. Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 161(1), 24--35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prescott, J. 1999. Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 10(4), 349--356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00048-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prescott, J. 2015. Multisensory processes in flavour perception and their influence on food choice. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 3, 47--52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.02.007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haverkamp, M. 2009. Synesthetic design-building multi-sensory arrangements. In Kai Bronner & Rainer Hirt (eds.), Audio Branding: Brands, Sound and Communication (pp. 164--181). Nomos, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- Haverkamp, M. 2010. Synesthetic approach for evaluation of the cross-sensory quality of multi-media applications. In Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) (Trondheim, Norway, June 21--23, 2010). QoMEX. IEEE, 136--141. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5516107Google Scholar
- Haverkamp, M. 2013. Synesthetic design: Handbook for a multi-sensory approach. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
- Spence, C. 2015. Eating with our ears: assessing the importance of the sounds of consumption on our perception and enjoyment of multisensory flavour experiences. Flavour 4:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-4-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zampini, M. and Spence, C. 2010. Assessing the role of sound in the perception of food and drink. Chemosen. Perception, 3(1), 57--67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9064-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reinoso Carvalho, F., Velasco, C., van Ee, R., Leboeuf, Y. and Spence, C. 2016. Music influences hedonic and taste ratings in beer. Front. Psychol. 7: 636. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00636Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vickers, Z. and Bourne, M. C. 1976. Crispness in foods: A review. J. Food Sci. 41(5), 1153--1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb14406.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Zampini, M. and Spence, C. 2004. The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J. Sense. Stud. 19(5), 347--363. h http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459x.2004.080403.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Velasco, C., Jones, R., King, S. and Spence, C. 2013. The sound of temperature: What information do pouring sounds convey concerning the temperature of a beverage. J. Sense. Stud. 28(5), 335--345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12052Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yan, K. S. and Dando, R. 2015. A crossmodal role for audition in taste perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. 41(3), 590--596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000044Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spence, C. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. 2013. Technology at the dining table. Flavour 2:16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-2-16Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spence, C. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. 2014. The perfect meal: the multisensory science of food and dining. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Spence, C. 2012. Auditory contributions to flavour perception and feeding behaviour. Physiol. Behav. 107(4), 505--515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.022Google ScholarCross Ref
- Obrist, M., Velasco, C., Vi, C. T., Ranasinghe, N., Israr, A., Cheok, A. D., Spence, C. and Gopalakrishnakone, P. 2016. Touch, taste, & smell user interfaces: The future of multisensory HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3285--3292. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856462 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hashimoto, Y., Nagaya, N., Kojima, M., Miyajima, S., Ohtaki, J., Yamamoto, A., Mitani, T. and Inami, M. 2006. Straw-like user interface: virtual experience of the sensation of drinking using a straw. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 42. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178873 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hashimoto, Y., Inami, M. and Kajimoto. H. 2008. Straw-Like User Interface (II): A New Method of Presenting Auditory Sensations for a More Natural Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios (EuroHaptics '08), Manuel Ferre (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 484--493. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_62 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petit, O., Cheok, A. D., Spence, C., Velasco, C. and Karunanayaka, K. T. 2015. Sensory marketing in light of new technologies. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 4 pages. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837006 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koizumi, N., Tanaka, H., Uema, Y. and Inami, M. 2011. Chewing jockey: augmented food texture by using sound based on the cross-modal effect. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 4 pages. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071449 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kadomura, A., Tsukada, K. and Siio. I. 2013. EducaTableware: computer-augmented tableware to enhance the eating experiences. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3071--3074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479613 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haverkamp, M. 2015. Can synesthetic perception help to define attractive product design? In 5th International Congress of Synaesthesia, Science & Arts. Alcalá la Real, Jaén, Spain.Google Scholar
- Calvert, G., Spence, C. and Stein, B. E. 2004. The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Velasco, C., Obrist, M., Petit, O., Karunanayaka, K., Cheok, A. D. and Spence, C. (2016). Cross-modal correspondences in the context of digital taste and flavor interfaces. Presented at CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Spence, C. 2011. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73(4), 971--995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, L. and Vroomen, J. (2013). Intersensory binding across space and time: a tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 75(5), 790--811. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iordanescu, L., Grabowecky, M. and Suzuki, S. 2011. Object-based auditory facilitation of visual search for pictures and words with frequent and rare targets. Acta Psychol. 137(2), 252--259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.017Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milliman, R. E. 1986. The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant patrons. J. Cons. Res. 13(2), 286--289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209068Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marks, L. E. 1978. The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Martino, G. and Marks, L. E. 2001. Synesthesia: Strong and weak. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10(2), 61--65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00116Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Rychtarikova, M., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Persoone, D., Spence, C. and Leman, M. 2015. Does music influence the multisensory tasting experience?. J. Sense. Stud. 30(5), 404--412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12168Google ScholarCross Ref
- Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Petit, O., Cheok, A. D. and Spence, C. 2016. Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review. Food Qual. Prefer., 52, 17--26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R. and Flom, R. 2004. Intersensory redundancy guides infants' selective attention, perceptual and cognitive development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13(99), 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00539.xGoogle Scholar
- Parise, C. V., Knorre, K. and Ernst, M. O. 2014. Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111(16), 6104--6108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322705111Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deroy, O., Crisinel, A. S. and Spence, C. 2013. Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 20(5), 878--896. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0397-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Palmer, S. E., Langlois, T. A. and Schloss, K. B. 2016. Music-to-color associations of single-line piano melodies in non-synesthetes. Multis. Res. 29(1-3), 157--193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002486Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parise, C. and Spence, C. 2013. Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population. In J. Simner & E. Hubbard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of synaesthesia (pp. 790--815). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Ludden, G. D., Kudrowitz, B. M., Schifferstein, H. N. and Hekkert, P. 2012. Surprise and humor in product design. Humor 25(3), 285--309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0015Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ludden, G. D. and Schifferstein, H. N. 2007. Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise. Int. J. Des. 1(3), 29--39.Google Scholar
- Ludden, G. D., Schifferstein, H. N. and Hekkert, P. 2008. Surprise as a design strategy. Des. Issues 24(2), 28--38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.2.28Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mandler, G. P. 1982. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition. The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 3--36). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Marinetti, F. T. 1909. The founding and manifesto of futurism. Retrieved from http://web.itu.edu.tr/~inceogl4/thresholds/futuristmanifesto.docGoogle Scholar
- Howells, T. 2014. Experimental eating. Black Dog Publishing, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Fox, J., Bailenson, J. and Binney, J. 2009. Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence-Teleop. Virt., 18(4), 294--303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.4.294 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Project Nourishing, retrieved from http://www.projectnourished.com/Google Scholar
- Spence, C. and Wang, Q. J. 2015. Sensory expectations elicited by the sounds of opening the packaging and pouring a beverage. Flavour 4:35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13411-015-0044-yGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Stroebele, N., & de Castro, J. M. 2006. Listening to music while eating is related to increases in people's food intake and meal duration. Appetite 47(3), 285--289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., Le Guellec, H., Morineau, T., & Lourel, M. 2008. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: A field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 32(10), 1795--1798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00764.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Elder, R. S., & Mohr, G. S. 2016. The crunch effect: Food sound salience as a consumption monitoring cue. Food Qual. Prefer. 51, 39--46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.015Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A multisensory approach for the design of food and drink enhancing sonic systems
Recommendations
The Future of Human-Food Interaction
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThere is an increasing interest in food within the HCI discipline, with many interactive prototypes emerging that augment, extend and challenge the various ways people engage with food, ranging from growing plants, cooking ingredients, serving dishes and ...
Design of Cyber Food:: Beginning to Understand Food as Computational Artifact
CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWith a growing interest in HCI around food, there is a trend to combine computing technology and food to facilitate novel eating experiences. However, most current systems tend to superimpose the technology over food rather than consider food itself as a ...
Exploring the Design Space for Human-Food-Technology Interaction: An Approach from the Lens of Eating Experiences
Embedded in everyday practices, food can be a rich resource for interaction design. This article focuses on eating experiences to uncover how bodily, sensory, and socio-cultural aspects of eating can be better leveraged for the design of user experience. ...
Comments