skip to main content
10.1145/3007577.3007578acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A multisensory approach for the design of food and drink enhancing sonic systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Everyday eating and drinking experiences involve multiple, interrelated, sensory inputs. However, when it comes to human-food interaction design (HFI) research, certain senses have received more attention than others have. Here, we focus on audition, a sense that has received limited attention in such context. In particular, we highlight the role of food/drink-related eating sounds, as a potential input for human-food interaction design. We review some of the few systems that have built on such sounds within food and drink contexts. We also present a multisensory design framework and discuss how the systematic connections that exist between the senses may provide some guidelines for the integration of eating sounds in HFI design. Finally, we present some key prospects that we foresee for research in technology design in HFI.

References

  1. Auvray, M. and Spence, C. 2008. The multisensory perception of flavor. Conscious. Cogn. 17(3), 1016--1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Spence, C. 2015. Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 161(1), 24--35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Prescott, J. 1999. Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 10(4), 349--356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00048-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Prescott, J. 2015. Multisensory processes in flavour perception and their influence on food choice. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 3, 47--52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.02.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Haverkamp, M. 2009. Synesthetic design-building multi-sensory arrangements. In Kai Bronner & Rainer Hirt (eds.), Audio Branding: Brands, Sound and Communication (pp. 164--181). Nomos, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Haverkamp, M. 2010. Synesthetic approach for evaluation of the cross-sensory quality of multi-media applications. In Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) (Trondheim, Norway, June 21--23, 2010). QoMEX. IEEE, 136--141. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5516107Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Haverkamp, M. 2013. Synesthetic design: Handbook for a multi-sensory approach. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Spence, C. 2015. Eating with our ears: assessing the importance of the sounds of consumption on our perception and enjoyment of multisensory flavour experiences. Flavour 4:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-4-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zampini, M. and Spence, C. 2010. Assessing the role of sound in the perception of food and drink. Chemosen. Perception, 3(1), 57--67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9064-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Velasco, C., van Ee, R., Leboeuf, Y. and Spence, C. 2016. Music influences hedonic and taste ratings in beer. Front. Psychol. 7: 636. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00636Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Vickers, Z. and Bourne, M. C. 1976. Crispness in foods: A review. J. Food Sci. 41(5), 1153--1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb14406.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Zampini, M. and Spence, C. 2004. The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J. Sense. Stud. 19(5), 347--363. h http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459x.2004.080403.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Velasco, C., Jones, R., King, S. and Spence, C. 2013. The sound of temperature: What information do pouring sounds convey concerning the temperature of a beverage. J. Sense. Stud. 28(5), 335--345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yan, K. S. and Dando, R. 2015. A crossmodal role for audition in taste perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. 41(3), 590--596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Spence, C. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. 2013. Technology at the dining table. Flavour 2:16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-2-16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Spence, C. and Piqueras-Fiszman, B. 2014. The perfect meal: the multisensory science of food and dining. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence, C. 2012. Auditory contributions to flavour perception and feeding behaviour. Physiol. Behav. 107(4), 505--515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Obrist, M., Velasco, C., Vi, C. T., Ranasinghe, N., Israr, A., Cheok, A. D., Spence, C. and Gopalakrishnakone, P. 2016. Touch, taste, & smell user interfaces: The future of multisensory HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3285--3292. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856462 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hashimoto, Y., Nagaya, N., Kojima, M., Miyajima, S., Ohtaki, J., Yamamoto, A., Mitani, T. and Inami, M. 2006. Straw-like user interface: virtual experience of the sensation of drinking using a straw. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 42. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178873 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hashimoto, Y., Inami, M. and Kajimoto. H. 2008. Straw-Like User Interface (II): A New Method of Presenting Auditory Sensations for a More Natural Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios (EuroHaptics '08), Manuel Ferre (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 484--493. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_62 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Petit, O., Cheok, A. D., Spence, C., Velasco, C. and Karunanayaka, K. T. 2015. Sensory marketing in light of new technologies. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 4 pages. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Koizumi, N., Tanaka, H., Uema, Y. and Inami, M. 2011. Chewing jockey: augmented food texture by using sound based on the cross-modal effect. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 4 pages. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071449 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kadomura, A., Tsukada, K. and Siio. I. 2013. EducaTableware: computer-augmented tableware to enhance the eating experiences. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3071--3074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479613 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Haverkamp, M. 2015. Can synesthetic perception help to define attractive product design? In 5th International Congress of Synaesthesia, Science & Arts. Alcalá la Real, Jaén, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Calvert, G., Spence, C. and Stein, B. E. 2004. The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Velasco, C., Obrist, M., Petit, O., Karunanayaka, K., Cheok, A. D. and Spence, C. (2016). Cross-modal correspondences in the context of digital taste and flavor interfaces. Presented at CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Spence, C. 2011. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73(4), 971--995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Chen, L. and Vroomen, J. (2013). Intersensory binding across space and time: a tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 75(5), 790--811. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Iordanescu, L., Grabowecky, M. and Suzuki, S. 2011. Object-based auditory facilitation of visual search for pictures and words with frequent and rare targets. Acta Psychol. 137(2), 252--259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Milliman, R. E. 1986. The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant patrons. J. Cons. Res. 13(2), 286--289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Marks, L. E. 1978. The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Martino, G. and Marks, L. E. 2001. Synesthesia: Strong and weak. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10(2), 61--65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Rychtarikova, M., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Persoone, D., Spence, C. and Leman, M. 2015. Does music influence the multisensory tasting experience?. J. Sense. Stud. 30(5), 404--412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Petit, O., Cheok, A. D. and Spence, C. 2016. Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review. Food Qual. Prefer., 52, 17--26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R. and Flom, R. 2004. Intersensory redundancy guides infants' selective attention, perceptual and cognitive development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13(99), 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00539.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Parise, C. V., Knorre, K. and Ernst, M. O. 2014. Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111(16), 6104--6108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322705111Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Deroy, O., Crisinel, A. S. and Spence, C. 2013. Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 20(5), 878--896. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0397-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Palmer, S. E., Langlois, T. A. and Schloss, K. B. 2016. Music-to-color associations of single-line piano melodies in non-synesthetes. Multis. Res. 29(1-3), 157--193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Parise, C. and Spence, C. 2013. Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population. In J. Simner & E. Hubbard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of synaesthesia (pp. 790--815). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ludden, G. D., Kudrowitz, B. M., Schifferstein, H. N. and Hekkert, P. 2012. Surprise and humor in product design. Humor 25(3), 285--309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Ludden, G. D. and Schifferstein, H. N. 2007. Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise. Int. J. Des. 1(3), 29--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Ludden, G. D., Schifferstein, H. N. and Hekkert, P. 2008. Surprise as a design strategy. Des. Issues 24(2), 28--38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.2.28Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Mandler, G. P. 1982. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition. The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 3--36). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Marinetti, F. T. 1909. The founding and manifesto of futurism. Retrieved from http://web.itu.edu.tr/~inceogl4/thresholds/futuristmanifesto.docGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Howells, T. 2014. Experimental eating. Black Dog Publishing, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Fox, J., Bailenson, J. and Binney, J. 2009. Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence-Teleop. Virt., 18(4), 294--303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.4.294 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Project Nourishing, retrieved from http://www.projectnourished.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Spence, C. and Wang, Q. J. 2015. Sensory expectations elicited by the sounds of opening the packaging and pouring a beverage. Flavour 4:35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13411-015-0044-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Stroebele, N., & de Castro, J. M. 2006. Listening to music while eating is related to increases in people's food intake and meal duration. Appetite 47(3), 285--289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., Le Guellec, H., Morineau, T., & Lourel, M. 2008. Sound level of environmental music and drinking behavior: A field experiment with beer drinkers. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 32(10), 1795--1798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00764.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Elder, R. S., & Mohr, G. S. 2016. The crunch effect: Food sound salience as a consumption monitoring cue. Food Qual. Prefer. 51, 39--46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A multisensory approach for the design of food and drink enhancing sonic systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MHFI '16: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multi-sensorial Approaches to Human-Food Interaction
      November 2016
      48 pages
      ISBN:9781450345613
      DOI:10.1145/3007577

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MHFI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%Overall Acceptance Rate6of8submissions,75%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader