skip to main content
10.1145/2998407.2998410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrated simulation of CIF3 and simulink models

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A model of a system (plant) is required to address aspects from different domains, e.g., supervisory control, communication, each of which need to be formulated using appropriate modeling tools. Modeling all these aspects using a single tool is a tedious task and mostly it is not achievable. As a result, the complete system has different modules modeled in different tools, later integrated and simulated together in order to achieve the desired functionality of the system as well as accuracy of the results. This makes the modeling easier and more efficient. The objective of this paper is to describe the integration between two modeling languages - Simulink and CIF3 for their use in modeling. Simulink is used to model the 802.11p communication system for transmission of data between vehicles, including transceivers and channels. CIF3 is used for modeling a discrete-event modulation control for a transceiver and continuous-time scenarios involving traffic safety. The integration of CIF3 models with Simulink model satisfies the safety requirements as well as provides useful insights into a combined cyber-physical system.

References

  1. D.A. van Beek, W.J. Fokkink, D. Hendriks, A. Hofkamp, J. Markovski, J.M. van de Mortel-Fronczak, and M.A. Reniers. CIF 3: Model-based engineering of supervisory controllers. International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. The MathWorks, Inc. Using Simulink, version 6..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D.A. van Beek, A.T. Hofkamp, M.A. Reniers, J.E. Rooda, and R.R.H. Schiffelers Co-simulation of Chi and Simulink models. In Proc. 6th EUROSIM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Vissers. Conversion of Simulink Stateflow to CIF. Internship Report, TU/e, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. SAE International On-Board System Requirements for V2V Safety Communications. Standard: J2945/1_201603, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hatnik, Uwe, and Sven Altmann. Using ModelSim, Matlab/Simulink and NS for simulation of distributed systems. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasan, M. S., Yu, H., Carrington, A., Yang, T. C. Co-simulation of wireless networked control systems over mobile ad hoc network using SIMULINK and OPNET. IET communications 3.8 (2009): 1297-1310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. E. Nadales Agut, M. A. Reniers, R. R. H Schiffelers, K. Y. Jorgensen, and D. A. van Beek. A semantic-preserving transformation from the Compositional Interchange Format to UPPAAL. In IFAC World Congress 2011, pages 12496-12502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Groote, Jan Friso, and Mohammad Reza Mousavi. Modeling and analysis of communicating systems. MIT press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Schünemann, Björn. V2X simulation runtime infrastructure VSimRTI: An assessment tool to design smart traffic management systems. Computer Networks 55.14 (2011): 3189-3198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Integrated simulation of CIF3 and simulink models

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader