skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998343acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Putting the Pieces Back Together Again: Contest Webs for Large-Scale Problem Solving

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

A key issue, whenever people work together to solve a complex problem, is how to divide the problem into parts done by different people and combine the parts into a solution for the whole problem. This paper presents a novel way of doing this with groups of contests called contest webs. Based on the analogy of supply chains for physical products, the method provides incentives for people to (a) reuse work done by themselves and others, (b) simultaneously explore multiple ways of combining interchangeable parts, and (c) work on parts of the problem where they can contribute the most.

The paper also describes a field test of this method in an online community of over 50,000 people who are developing proposals for what to do about global climate change. The early results suggest that the method can, indeed, work at scale as intended.

References

  1. Lada A. Adamic. 2002. Zipf, Power-laws, and Pareto - a ranking tutorial. Retrieved August 5, 2016 from http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking/ranking.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Robert J. Allio. 2004. CEO Interview: The InnoCentive Model of Open Innovation. Strategy & Leadership 32, 4: 4--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jeff Alstott, Ed Bullmore, and Dietmar Plenz. 2014. powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions. PLOS ONE 9, 1: e85777.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kenneth J. Arrow. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Universities-National Bureau Committee for and Committee on Economic Growth of the Social Science Research Council (eds.). Princeton University Press, Rochester, NY, 609--626. Retrieved from www.nber.org/chapters/c2144.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kenneth J. Arrow and Gerard Debreu. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 265--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carliss Young Baldwin and Kim B. Clark. 2000. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Joel Chan, Steven P. Dow, and Christian D. Schunn. 2015. Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies 36: 31--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lydia B. Chilton, Juho Kim, Paul André, Felicia Cordeiro, James A. Landay, Daniel S. Weld, Steven P. Dow, Robert C. Miller, and Haoqi Zhang. 2014. Frenzy: Collaborative Data Organization for Creating Conference Sessions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1255--1264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lydia B. Chilton, Greg Little, Darren Edge, Daniel S. Weld, and James A. Landay. 2013. Cascade: Crowdsourcing Taxonomy Creation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ellen Christiaanse and Kuldeep Kumar. 2000. ICT-enabled coordination of dynamic supply webs. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 30, 3/4: 268--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gavin Clarkson and Marshall Van Alstyne. 2007. The Social Efficiency of Fairness: An Innovation Economics Approach to Innovation. In 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '07), 155b--155b. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ronald H. Coase. 1937. The Nature Of The Firm. Economica 4, 16: 386--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kenneth Davis. 2015. InnoCentive.com Collaboration Case Study. Journal of Management 3, 1: 20--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. 2008. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Communications of the ACM 51, 1: 107--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Erik P. Duhaime, Gary M. Olson, and Thomas W. Malone. 2015. Broad Participation in Collective Problem Solving Can Influence Participants and Lead to Better Solutions: Evidence from the MIT Climate CoLab. MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://cci.mit.edu/working_papers_2012_2013/duhaime%20colab%20wp%206--2015%20final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Power Laws and Rich-Get-Richer Phenomena. In Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, 543--560. Retrieved from https://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/networks-book-ch18.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jay R. Galbraith. 1995. Designing organizations: An executive briefing on strategy, structure, and process. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. David Hounshell. 1985. From the American System to Mass Production, 1800--1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. JHU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. James Howison and James D. Herbsleb. 2013. Incentives and Integration in Scientific Software Production. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 459--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joshua Introne, Robert Laubacher, and Thomas Malone. 201 Enabling Open Development Methodologies in Climate Change Assessment Modeling. IEEE Software 28, 6: 56--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joshua Introne, Robert Laubacher, Gary Olson, and Thomas Malone. 2011. The Climate CoLab: Large Scale Model-based Collaborative Planning. In International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 40--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Juho Kim, Haoqi Zhang, Paul André, Lydia B. Chilton, Wendy Mackay, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Robert C. Miller, and Steven P. Dow. 2013. Cobi: A Community-informed Conference Scheduling Tool. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13), 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Aniket Kittur, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Michael Bernstein, Elizabeth Gerber, Aaron Shaw, John Zimmerman, Matt Lease, and John Horton. 2013. The Future of Crowd Work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 1301--1318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, Susheel Khamkar, and Robert E. Kraut. 2011. CrowdForge: Crowdsourcing Complex Work. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11), 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Anand Kulkarni, Matthew Can, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Collaboratively Crowdsourcing Workflows with Turkomatic. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 1003--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Karim Lakhani, David A. Garvin, and Eric Lonstein. 2010. TopCoder (A): Developing Software Through Crowdsourcing. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Case, 610--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Karim R. Lakhani, Anne-Laure Fayard, Natalia Levina, and Stephanie Healy Pokrywa. 2012. OpenIDEO. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Management Unit Case, 612--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas D. LaToza, W. Ben Towne, Christian M. Adriano, and André van der Hoek. 2014. Microtask Programming: Building Software with a Crowd. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14), 43--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Paul R. Lawrence and Jay W. Lorsch. 1967. Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12, 1: 1--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Charlotte P. Lee and Drew Paine. 2015. From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 179--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Thomas W. Malone and Kevin Crowston. 1994. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 26, 1: 87--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Thomas W. Malone and Mark Klein. 2007. Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change. Innovations 2, 3: 15--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Thomas W. Malone, Robert Laubacher, and Laur Fisher. 2014. How Millions of People Can Help Solve Climate Change. PBS NOVA Next. Retrieved January 18, 2014 from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/earth/crowdsourcing-climate-change-solutions/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. David A. Nadler and Michael L. Tushman. 1997. Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeffrey V. Nickerson and Andres Monroy-Hernandez. 2011. Appropriation and Creativity: User-Initiated Contests in Scratch. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '11), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Pinar Ozturk, Yue Han, W. Ben Towne, and Jeffrey V. Nickerson. 2016. Topic Prevalence and Reuse in an Open Innovation Community. In Collective Intelligence. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/stern.nyu.edu/collective-intelligence-conference/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jerome H. Reichman. 2009. Intellectual Property in the Twenty-First Century: Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow? Houston Law Review 46, 4: 1115--1185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert Crowdsourcing with Flash Teams. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14), 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lloyd S. Shapley. 1953. Stochastic Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 39, 10: 1095--1100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Herbert Alexander Simon. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Adam Smith. 1776. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Strahan & Cadell, The Strand, London. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=C5dNAAAAcAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas F. Stocker, Dahe Qin, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Melinda M.B. Tignor, Simon K. Allen, Judith Boschung, Alexander Nauels, Yu Xia, Vincent Bex, and Pauline M. Midgley (eds.). 2013. Climate Change 2013- The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SummaryVolume_FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. James D. Thompson. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. Transaction Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. W. Ben Towne, Carolyn P. Rosé, and James D. Herbsleb. 2016. The Key Role of Navigation in Online Challenge Platforms. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/stern.nyu.edu/collective-intelligence-conference/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2013. International Energy Outlook 2013. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 25, 2013 from https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo13/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. David Weinberger. 2003. Small Pieces Loosely Joined: A Unified Theory Of The Web. Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Oliver E. Williamson. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. Free Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=IFm3AAAAIAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Lixiu Yu, Aniket Kittur, and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Distributed Analogical Idea Generation: Inventing with Crowds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1245--1254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Lixiu Yu, Aniket Kittur, and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Searching for Analogical Ideas with Crowds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1225--1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Haoqi Zhang, Edith Law, Rob Miller, Krzysztof Gajos, David Parkes, and Eric Horvitz. 2012. Human Computation Tasks with Global Constraints. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Jonathan Zittrain. 2008. The Future of the Internet--And How to Stop It. Yale University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Putting the Pieces Back Together Again: Contest Webs for Large-Scale Problem Solving

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader