skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998266acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Media, Meaning, and Context Loss in Ephemeral Communication Platforms: A Qualitative Investigation on Snapchat

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most social media platforms are persistent in nature, enabling users to re-visit content at their discretion. Platforms with design features that support ephemeral communications, such as Snapchat, have become increasingly popular. During the course of our empirical study, we interviewed 15 Snapchat users about their experiences and practices. Our data reveal that Snapchat users experienced different types of loss, including media, meaning, and context loss, and developed workarounds to deal with those losses, including preemptive action and collaborative saving practices. Our findings revealed a conflict between the user's expectation of the affordance the ephemeral platforms would provide, and the actions user's followed.

References

  1. Azza Abouzied and Jay Chen. 2015. Harnessing data loss with forgetful data structures. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 168--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Michael Backes, Sebastian Gerling, Stefan Lorenz, and Stephan Lukas. 2014. "X-Pire 2.0: a user-controlled expiration date and copy protection mechanism." in Proceedings of the 29th annual ACM Symposium on applied computing, pp. 1633--1640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Joseph B. Bayer, Nicole B. Ellison, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Emily B. Falk. 2015. "Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat." Information, Communication & Society: 122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Matt Bishop, Emily. R. Butler, Kevin Butler, Carrie Gates, and Steven Greenspan. 2013. "Forgive and forget: return to obscurity." In Proceedings of the 2013 workshop on New security paradigms workshop, pp. 110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Danah Boyd. 2014. It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jennifer Charteris, Sue Gregory, and Yvonne Masters. 2014. "Snapchat "selfies": The case of disappearing data?." eds.) Hegarty, B., McDonald, j., & Loke, S.. K., Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology: 389--393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jordan Crook, and Anna Escher. 2015. "A Brief History of Snapchat". Techcrunch. Retrieved on April 19, 2016 from http://techcrunch.com/gallery/a-briefhistory-of-snapchat/slide/41/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rebecca Gulotta, William Odom, Jodi Forlizzi, and Haakon Faste. 2013. Digital artifacts as legacy: exploring the lifespan and value of digital data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1813--1822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gillian R. Hayes, Shwetak N. Patel, Khai N. Truong, Giovanni Iachello, Julie A. Kientz, Rob Farmer, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2004. "The Personal Audio Loop: Designing A Ubiquitous Audio-Based Memory Aid". Mobile Human-Computer Interaction Mobilehci 2004, 168--179. Springer Science + Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyndon Kennedy. 2013. "Emerging trends in social multimedia." Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Socially-aware multimedia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Christopher. Kotfila. 2014. "This message will selfdestruct: The growing role of obscurity and selfdestructing data in digital communication." Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 40.2: 12--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman. 2012. "On the institutional archiving of social media." Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kimberly J. Mitchell, David Finkelhor, Lisa M. Jones and Janis Wolak. 2012. Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Didem Özkul and Lee Humphreys. 2015. "Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media." Mobile Media & Communication: 2050157914565846.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicole A. Poltash.2012."Snapchat and sexting: A snapshot of baring your bare essentials." Rich. JL & Tech. 19: 1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lukasz Piwek and Adam Joinson.2016. "What do they snapchat about"? Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service." Computers in Human Behavior 54: 358--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Franziska Roesner, Brian T. Gill and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of Snapchat's self-destructing messages. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security: 64--76. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Masoomeh Rudafshani, Paul A. S. Ward, and Bernard Wong. 2012. MemRed: towards reliable web applications. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Secure and Dependable Middleware for Cloud Monitoring and Management (SDMCMM '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. 2011. Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Esther Shein. 2013. Ephemeral data. Commun. ACM 56, 9 (September 2013), 20--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Marc Smith, Vladimir Barash, Lise Getoor, and Hady W. Lauw. 2008. Leveraging social context for searching social media. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM workshop on Search in social media (SSM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Snapchat. Snapchat ads, Retrieved on April 21, 2016 from https://www.snapchat.com/adsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Utz, Sonja, Nicole Muscanell, and Cameran Khalid. "Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: a comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use."Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18, no. 3 (2015): 141--146. Page 12 of 12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhewei Wei, Ge Luo, Ke Yi, Xiaoyong Du, and JiRong Wen. 2015. Persistent Data Sketching. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 795--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Allison Woodruff. 2014. Necessary, unpleasant, and disempowering: reputation management in the internet age. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mihaela Vorvoreanu. "Perceptions of corporations on Facebook: An analysis of Facebook social norms." Journal of New Communications Research. 4, no. 1 (2009): 67--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Bin Xu, Pamara Chang, Christopher L. Welker, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Dan Cosley. 2016. Automatic Archiving versus Default Deletion: What Snapchat Tells Us About Ephemerality in Design. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1662--1675. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chen Ying-Yu, Frank Bentley, Christian Holz, and Cheng Xu. 2015. Sharing (and discussing) the moment: The conversations that occur around shared mobile media. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp.264--273). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Media, Meaning, and Context Loss in Ephemeral Communication Platforms: A Qualitative Investigation on Snapchat

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader