skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Deep Structures of Collaboration: Physiological Correlates of Collective Intelligence and Group Satisfaction

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collective intelligence (CI), a group's capacity to perform a wide variety of tasks, is a key factor in successful collaboration. Group composition, particularly diversity and member social perceptiveness, are consistent predictors of CI, but we have limited knowledge about the mechanisms underlying their effects. To address this gap, we examine how physiological synchrony, as an indicator of coordination and rapport, relates to CI in computer-mediated teams, and if synchrony might serve as a mechanism explaining the effect of group composition on CI. We present results from a laboratory experiment where 60 dyads completed the Test of Collective Intelligence (TCI) together online and rated their group satisfaction, while wearing physiological sensors. We find that synchrony in facial expressions (indicative of shared experience) was associated with CI and synchrony in electrodermal activity (indicative of shared arousal) with group satisfaction. Furthermore, various forms of synchrony mediated the effect of member diversity and social perceptiveness on CI and group satisfaction. Our results have important implications for online collaborations and distributed teams.

References

  1. Ishani Aggarwal, Anita Williams Woolley, C.F. Chabris, and T.W. Malone. 2015. Cognitive diversity, collective intelligence, and learning. In Proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Modupe Akinola. 2010. Measuring the pulse of an organization: Integrating physiological measures into the organizational scholar's toolbox. Research in Organizational Behavior 30: 203--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal. 1992. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 111, 2: 256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jason K Baker, Rachel M Fenning, Mariann A Howland, Brian R Baucom, Jacquelyn Moffitt, and Stephen A Erath. 2015. Brief report: A pilot study of parent-child biobehavioral synchrony in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 45, 12: 4140--4146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tadas Baltrusaitis, Marwa Mahmoud, and Peter Robinson. 2015. Cross-dataset learning and person-specific normalisation for automatic Action Unit detection. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright, J. Hill, Y. Raste, and I. Plumb. 2001. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 42, 02: 241--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mathilde M Bekker, Judith S Olson, and Gary M Olson. 1995. Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques, 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mathias Benedek and Christian Kaernbach. 2010. A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of neuroscience methods 190, 1: 80--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Berdahl, C. J. Torney, C. C. Ioannou, J. J. Faria, and I. D. Couzin. 2013. Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339, 6119: 574--576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tony Bergstrom and Karrie Karahalios. 2007. Conversation Clock: Visualizing audio patterns in colocated groups. In System Sciences, HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, pp. 78--78. IEEE, 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Donald J. Berndt and James Clifford. 1994. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In KDD workshop, 359--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Frank J Bernieri. 1988. Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal behavior 12, 2: 120--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Frank J. Bernieri, J. Steven Reznick, and Robert Rosenthal. 1988. Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 2: 243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jim Blascovich, Wendy Berry Mendes, and M. Seery. 2002. Intergroup Encounters and Threat. From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions, Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, edited by Diane M. Mackie and Eliot R. Smith: 89--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jim Blascovich, Steven J. Spencer, Diane Quinn, and Claude Steele. 2001. African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological science 12, 3: 225--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alan Bränzel, Christian Holz, Daniel Hoffmann, et al. 2013. GravitySpace: tracking users and their poses in a smart room using a pressure-sensing floor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 725--734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Joseph J Campos and Harold J Johnson. 1967. Affect, verbalization, and directional fractionation of autonomic responses. Psychophysiology 3, 3: 285--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jonas Chatel-Goldman, Marco Congedo, Christian Jutten, and Jean-Luc Schwartz. 2014. Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michael G Coles. 1972. Cardiac and respiratory activity during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96, 2: 371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. George E Deane. 1961. Human heart rate responses during experimentally induced anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 6: 489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ian J. Deary. 2012. Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 43, 1: 453--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Laurie R. Weingart. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 4: 741--749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Joan Morris DiMicco, Katherine J Hollenbach, Anna Pandolfo, and Walter Bender. 2007. The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Human-Computer Interaction 22, 1--2: 47--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Elizabeth Duffy. 1957. The psychological significance of the concept of" arousal" or" activation." Psychological review 64, 5: 265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Paul Ekman and Wallace V. Friesen. 1978. Manual for the facial action coding system. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillary Anger Elfenbein. 2006. Team emotional intelligence: What it can mean and how it can affect performance. In Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work, Druskat V, F. Sala and G. Mount (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 165--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, et al. 2015. Collective intelligence in online collaboration emerges in different contexts and cultures. CHI '15 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Lisa X. Jing, Christopher F. Chabris, and Thomas W. Malone. 2014. Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PLoS ONE 9, 12: e115212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ruth Feldman. 2007. Parent-infant synchrony biological foundations and developmental outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 6: 340--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Christopher D Frith and Heidelinde A Allen. 1983. The skin conductance orienting response as an index of attention. Biological psychology 17, 1: 27--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ella Glikson, Raveh Harush, Young Ji Kim, Anita Williams Woolley, and M. Erez. 2016. Psychological safety and collective intelligence in multicultural globally dispersed teams. In the 2016 INGRoup Conference. Helsinki, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Deborah M. Gordon. 2016. Collective Wisdom of Ants. Scientific American 314, 2: 44--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. David A. Harrison and Katherine J. Klein. 2007. What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32, 4: 1199--1228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Andrew F. Hayes. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Donald Olding Hebb. 1955. Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychological review 62, 4: 243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard. 2014. Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 307--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Mary M. Herrald and Joe Tomaka. 2002. Patterns of emotion-specific appraisal, coping, and cardiovascular reactivity during an ongoing emotional episode. Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 2: 434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michael J. Hove and Jane L. Risen. 2009. It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition 27, 6: 949.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Gardner Howard. 1999. Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. Howard Gardner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Zac E Imel, Jacqueline S Barco, Halley J Brown, et al. 2014. The association of therapist empathy and synchrony in vocally encoded arousal. Journal of counseling psychology 61, 1: 146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. K. A. Jehn, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 4: 741--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Daniel Kahneman, Bernard Tursky, David Shapiro, and Andrew Crider. 1969. Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. Journal of experimental psychology 79, 1: 164--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Taemie Kim, Agnes Chang, Lindsey Holland, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2008. Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaboration with sociometric feedback. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3183--3188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Young Ji Kim, D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2015. Work together, play smart: collective intelligence in League of Legends teams. In Proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Bradley L. Kirkman, Benson Rosen, Paul E. Tesluk, and Cristina B. Gibson. 2004. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal 47, 2: 175--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Daan van Knippenberg and Michaéla C. Schippers. 2007. Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 1: 515--541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Eva G. Krumhuber and Antony SR Manstead. 2009. Can Duchenne smiles be feigned? New evidence on felt and false smiles. Emotion 9, 6: 807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Meredyth Krych-Appelbaum, Julie Banzon Law, Dayna Jones, Allyson Barnacz, Amanda Johnson, and Julian Paul Keenan. 2007. "I think I know what you mean": The role of theory of mind in collaborative communication. Interaction Studies 8, 2: 267--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. John I Lacey. 1959. Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In Research in Psychotherapy, Apr, 1958, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. John I Lacey and Beatrice C Lacey. 1970. Some autonomic-central nervous system interrelationships. In P. Black (Ed.), Physiological correlates of emotion (pp. 205227). New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Dora C Lau and J Keith Murnighan. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 23, 2: 325--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Jane Leighton, Geoffrey Bird, Caitlin Orsini, and Cecilia Heyes. 2010. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 6: 905--910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Gilly Leshed, Diego Perez, Jeffrey T Hancock, et al. 2009. Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Robert W. Levenson, Laura L. Carstensen, and John M. Gottman. 1994. Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of personality and social psychology 67, 1: 56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Michael K. Lindell, Christina J. Brandt, and David J. Whitney. 1999. A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological Measurement 23, 2: 127--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Robert B Malmo. 1959. Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychological review 66, 6: 367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Regan L Mandryk and Kori M Inkpen. 2004. Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 102--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. John E. Mathieu, Michael R. Kukenberger, Lauren D'Innocenzo, and Greg Reilly. 2015. Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology 100, no. 3: 713--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. John D. Mayer, Richard D. Roberts, and Sigal G. Barsade. 2008. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 507--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Martha L. Maznevski and Katherine M. Chudoba. 2000. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization science 11, 5: 473--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Michael P. McAssey, Jonathan Helm, Fushing Hsieh, David A. Sbarra, and Emilio Ferrer. 2013. Methodological advances for detecting physiological synchrony during dyadic interactions. Methodology 9, 2: 41--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Daniel N McIntosh. 2006. Spontaneous facial mimicry, liking and emotional contagion. Polish Psychological Bulletin 37, 1: 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Poppy Lauretta McLeod, Sharon Alisa Lobel, and Taylor H. Cox. 1996. Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small group research 27, 2: 248--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Colleen Merrifield and James Danckert. 2014. Characterizing the psychophysiological signature of boredom. Experimental brain research 232, 2: 481--491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Nicoleta Meslec, Ishani Aggarwal, and P. L Curşeu. 2016. The insensitive ruins it all: Compositional and compilational influences of social sensitivity on collective intelligence in groups. Frontiers in Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ivana Mikic, Kohsia Huang, and Mohan Trivedi. 2000. Activity monitoring and summarization for an intelligent meeting room. In Human Motion, 2000. Proceedings. Workshop on, 107--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Lynden K Miles, Louise K Nind, and C Neil Macrae. 2009. The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of experimental social psychology 45, 3: 585--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. F. J Milliken, C. A Bartel, and T. R Kurtzberg. 2003. Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration: 32--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Panagiotis Mitkidis, John J. McGraw, Andreas Roepstorff, and Sebastian Wallot. 2015. Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game. Physiology & behavior 149: 101--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. S. Mohammed and E. Ringseis. 2001. Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85, 2: 310--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Dan Mønster, Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson, Jacob Kjær Eskildsen, and Sebastian Wallot. 2016. Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology & Behavior 156: 24--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Brian Mullen and Carolyn Copper. 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological bulletin 115, 2: 210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Reiner Nikula. 1991. Psychological correlates of nonspecific skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology 28, 1: 86--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Redmond G O'Connell, Mark A Bellgrove, Paul M Dockree, Adam Lau, Michael Fitzgerald, and Ian H Robertson. 2008. Self-alert training: Volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 46, 5: 1379--1390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. JF Papillo and D Shapiro. 1990. The cardiovascular system In JT Cacioppo and LG Tassinary (Eds.) Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 456--512). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Suzanne J. Peterson, Christopher S. Reina, David A. Waldman, and William J. Becker. 2015. Using physiological methods to study emotions in organizations. In New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Katherine W. Phillips. 2003. The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 3--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Kristopher J. Preacher and Ken Kelley. 2011. Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological methods 16, 2: 93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Rainer Reisenzein, Markus Studtmann, and Gernot Horstmann. 2013. Coherence between emotion and facial expression: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Emotion Review 5, 1: 16--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Idalmis Santiesteban, Sarah White, Jennifer Cook, Sam J Gilbert, Cecilia Heyes, and Geoffrey Bird. 2012. Training social cognition: from imitation to theory of mind. Cognition 122, 2: 228--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Karen L. Schmidt, Zara Ambadar, Jeffrey F. Cohn, and L. Ian Reed. 2006. Movement differences between deliberate and spontaneous facial expressions: Zygomaticus major action in smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 30, 1: 37--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Janienke Sturm, Olga Houben-van Herwijnen, Anke Eyck, and Jacques Terken. 2007. Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Henri Tajfel and John C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In (2nd ed.), Stephen Worchel (ed.). Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Johannes Schöning, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2014. Investigating the effects of using biofeedback as visual stress indicator during videomediated collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Thomas A. Timmerman. 2000. Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research 31, 5: 592--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. H. Triandis, L. Kurowski, and M. Gelfand. 1994. Workplace diversity. In H. Triandis, M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds.). Consulting Psychologists Press., Palo Alto, CA, 769--827.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Piercarlo Valdesolo, Jennifer Ouyang, and David DeSteno. 2010. The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 4: 693--695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Ruth Wageman, J. Richard Hackman, and Erin Lehman. 2005. Team Diagnostic Survey Development of an Instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41, 4: 373--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Scott S. Wiltermuth and Chip Heath. 2009. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological science 20, 1: 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Piotr Winkielman and John T. Cacioppo. 2001. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of personality and social psychology 81, 6: 989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Gwen M. Wittenbaum, Garold Stasser, and Carol J. Merry. 1996. Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, 2: 129--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Anita Williams Woolley and Ishani Aggarwal. Collective intelligence and group learning. In Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning, Linda Argote and J. M Levine (eds.). Oxford University Press, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Anita Williams Woolley and Ishani Aggarwal. The mind and the heart of the group: Collective intelligence and relationship quality in task performing teams. Under review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, and Thomas W. Malone. 2015. Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24, 6: 420--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330, 6004: 686--688.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Anita Williams Woolley, Rosalind M. Chow, Anna T. Mayo, Jin Wook Chang, and Christoph Riedl. 2016. Competition and collective intelligence: Do women always make groups smarter? Under review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhiwen Yu and Yuichi Nakamura. 2010. Smart meeting systems: A survey of state-of-the-art and open issues. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 42, 2: 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Deep Structures of Collaboration: Physiological Correlates of Collective Intelligence and Group Satisfaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader