ABSTRACT
Collective intelligence (CI), a group's capacity to perform a wide variety of tasks, is a key factor in successful collaboration. Group composition, particularly diversity and member social perceptiveness, are consistent predictors of CI, but we have limited knowledge about the mechanisms underlying their effects. To address this gap, we examine how physiological synchrony, as an indicator of coordination and rapport, relates to CI in computer-mediated teams, and if synchrony might serve as a mechanism explaining the effect of group composition on CI. We present results from a laboratory experiment where 60 dyads completed the Test of Collective Intelligence (TCI) together online and rated their group satisfaction, while wearing physiological sensors. We find that synchrony in facial expressions (indicative of shared experience) was associated with CI and synchrony in electrodermal activity (indicative of shared arousal) with group satisfaction. Furthermore, various forms of synchrony mediated the effect of member diversity and social perceptiveness on CI and group satisfaction. Our results have important implications for online collaborations and distributed teams.
- Ishani Aggarwal, Anita Williams Woolley, C.F. Chabris, and T.W. Malone. 2015. Cognitive diversity, collective intelligence, and learning. In Proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2015.Google Scholar
- Modupe Akinola. 2010. Measuring the pulse of an organization: Integrating physiological measures into the organizational scholar's toolbox. Research in Organizational Behavior 30: 203--223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal. 1992. Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 111, 2: 256.Google Scholar
- Jason K Baker, Rachel M Fenning, Mariann A Howland, Brian R Baucom, Jacquelyn Moffitt, and Stephen A Erath. 2015. Brief report: A pilot study of parent-child biobehavioral synchrony in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 45, 12: 4140--4146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tadas Baltrusaitis, Marwa Mahmoud, and Peter Robinson. 2015. Cross-dataset learning and person-specific normalisation for automatic Action Unit detection. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on, 1--6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright, J. Hill, Y. Raste, and I. Plumb. 2001. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 42, 02: 241--251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mathilde M Bekker, Judith S Olson, and Gary M Olson. 1995. Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques, 157--166. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Benedek and Christian Kaernbach. 2010. A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of neuroscience methods 190, 1: 80--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Berdahl, C. J. Torney, C. C. Ioannou, J. J. Faria, and I. D. Couzin. 2013. Emergent sensing of complex environments by mobile animal groups. Science 339, 6119: 574--576.Google Scholar
- Tony Bergstrom and Karrie Karahalios. 2007. Conversation Clock: Visualizing audio patterns in colocated groups. In System Sciences, HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, pp. 78--78. IEEE, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald J. Berndt and James Clifford. 1994. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In KDD workshop, 359--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank J Bernieri. 1988. Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal behavior 12, 2: 120--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank J. Bernieri, J. Steven Reznick, and Robert Rosenthal. 1988. Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. Journal of personality and social psychology 54, 2: 243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jim Blascovich, Wendy Berry Mendes, and M. Seery. 2002. Intergroup Encounters and Threat. From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions, Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, edited by Diane M. Mackie and Eliot R. Smith: 89--109.Google Scholar
- Jim Blascovich, Steven J. Spencer, Diane Quinn, and Claude Steele. 2001. African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological science 12, 3: 225--229.Google Scholar
- Alan Bränzel, Christian Holz, Daniel Hoffmann, et al. 2013. GravitySpace: tracking users and their poses in a smart room using a pressure-sensing floor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 725--734. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph J Campos and Harold J Johnson. 1967. Affect, verbalization, and directional fractionation of autonomic responses. Psychophysiology 3, 3: 285--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonas Chatel-Goldman, Marco Congedo, Christian Jutten, and Jean-Luc Schwartz. 2014. Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 8.Google Scholar
- Michael G Coles. 1972. Cardiac and respiratory activity during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96, 2: 371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- George E Deane. 1961. Human heart rate responses during experimentally induced anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 6: 489.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ian J. Deary. 2012. Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 43, 1: 453--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Laurie R. Weingart. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 4: 741--749.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joan Morris DiMicco, Katherine J Hollenbach, Anna Pandolfo, and Walter Bender. 2007. The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Human-Computer Interaction 22, 1--2: 47--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Duffy. 1957. The psychological significance of the concept of" arousal" or" activation." Psychological review 64, 5: 265.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Ekman and Wallace V. Friesen. 1978. Manual for the facial action coding system. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Hillary Anger Elfenbein. 2006. Team emotional intelligence: What it can mean and how it can affect performance. In Linking emotional intelligence and performance at work, Druskat V, F. Sala and G. Mount (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 165--184.Google Scholar
- D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, et al. 2015. Collective intelligence in online collaboration emerges in different contexts and cultures. CHI '15 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Lisa X. Jing, Christopher F. Chabris, and Thomas W. Malone. 2014. Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PLoS ONE 9, 12: e115212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruth Feldman. 2007. Parent-infant synchrony biological foundations and developmental outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 6: 340--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher D Frith and Heidelinde A Allen. 1983. The skin conductance orienting response as an index of attention. Biological psychology 17, 1: 27--39.Google Scholar
- Ella Glikson, Raveh Harush, Young Ji Kim, Anita Williams Woolley, and M. Erez. 2016. Psychological safety and collective intelligence in multicultural globally dispersed teams. In the 2016 INGRoup Conference. Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- Deborah M. Gordon. 2016. Collective Wisdom of Ants. Scientific American 314, 2: 44--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David A. Harrison and Katherine J. Klein. 2007. What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32, 4: 1199--1228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew F. Hayes. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Donald Olding Hebb. 1955. Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychological review 62, 4: 243.Google Scholar
- Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard. 2014. Using electrodermal activity to recognize ease of engagement in children during social interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 307--317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mary M. Herrald and Joe Tomaka. 2002. Patterns of emotion-specific appraisal, coping, and cardiovascular reactivity during an ongoing emotional episode. Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 2: 434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael J. Hove and Jane L. Risen. 2009. It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition 27, 6: 949.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gardner Howard. 1999. Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. Howard Gardner.Google Scholar
- Zac E Imel, Jacqueline S Barco, Halley J Brown, et al. 2014. The association of therapist empathy and synchrony in vocally encoded arousal. Journal of counseling psychology 61, 1: 146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. A. Jehn, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 4: 741--763.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Kahneman, Bernard Tursky, David Shapiro, and Andrew Crider. 1969. Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. Journal of experimental psychology 79, 1: 164--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taemie Kim, Agnes Chang, Lindsey Holland, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2008. Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaboration with sociometric feedback. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3183--3188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young Ji Kim, D. Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2015. Work together, play smart: collective intelligence in League of Legends teams. In Proceedings of Collective Intelligence 2015.Google Scholar
- Bradley L. Kirkman, Benson Rosen, Paul E. Tesluk, and Cristina B. Gibson. 2004. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal 47, 2: 175--192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daan van Knippenberg and Michaéla C. Schippers. 2007. Work Group Diversity. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 1: 515--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva G. Krumhuber and Antony SR Manstead. 2009. Can Duchenne smiles be feigned? New evidence on felt and false smiles. Emotion 9, 6: 807.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meredyth Krych-Appelbaum, Julie Banzon Law, Dayna Jones, Allyson Barnacz, Amanda Johnson, and Julian Paul Keenan. 2007. "I think I know what you mean": The role of theory of mind in collaborative communication. Interaction Studies 8, 2: 267--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John I Lacey. 1959. Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In Research in Psychotherapy, Apr, 1958, Washington, DC.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John I Lacey and Beatrice C Lacey. 1970. Some autonomic-central nervous system interrelationships. In P. Black (Ed.), Physiological correlates of emotion (pp. 205227). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Dora C Lau and J Keith Murnighan. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 23, 2: 325--340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jane Leighton, Geoffrey Bird, Caitlin Orsini, and Cecilia Heyes. 2010. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 6: 905--910.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gilly Leshed, Diego Perez, Jeffrey T Hancock, et al. 2009. Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 537--546. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert W. Levenson, Laura L. Carstensen, and John M. Gottman. 1994. Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of personality and social psychology 67, 1: 56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael K. Lindell, Christina J. Brandt, and David J. Whitney. 1999. A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological Measurement 23, 2: 127--135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert B Malmo. 1959. Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychological review 66, 6: 367.Google Scholar
- Regan L Mandryk and Kori M Inkpen. 2004. Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 102--111. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John E. Mathieu, Michael R. Kukenberger, Lauren D'Innocenzo, and Greg Reilly. 2015. Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. Journal of Applied Psychology 100, no. 3: 713--734.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John D. Mayer, Richard D. Roberts, and Sigal G. Barsade. 2008. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 507--536.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martha L. Maznevski and Katherine M. Chudoba. 2000. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization science 11, 5: 473--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael P. McAssey, Jonathan Helm, Fushing Hsieh, David A. Sbarra, and Emilio Ferrer. 2013. Methodological advances for detecting physiological synchrony during dyadic interactions. Methodology 9, 2: 41--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel N McIntosh. 2006. Spontaneous facial mimicry, liking and emotional contagion. Polish Psychological Bulletin 37, 1: 31.Google Scholar
- Poppy Lauretta McLeod, Sharon Alisa Lobel, and Taylor H. Cox. 1996. Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small group research 27, 2: 248--264.Google Scholar
- Colleen Merrifield and James Danckert. 2014. Characterizing the psychophysiological signature of boredom. Experimental brain research 232, 2: 481--491.Google Scholar
- Nicoleta Meslec, Ishani Aggarwal, and P. L Curşeu. 2016. The insensitive ruins it all: Compositional and compilational influences of social sensitivity on collective intelligence in groups. Frontiers in Psychology.Google Scholar
- Ivana Mikic, Kohsia Huang, and Mohan Trivedi. 2000. Activity monitoring and summarization for an intelligent meeting room. In Human Motion, 2000. Proceedings. Workshop on, 107--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynden K Miles, Louise K Nind, and C Neil Macrae. 2009. The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of experimental social psychology 45, 3: 585--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. J Milliken, C. A Bartel, and T. R Kurtzberg. 2003. Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration: 32--62.Google Scholar
- Panagiotis Mitkidis, John J. McGraw, Andreas Roepstorff, and Sebastian Wallot. 2015. Building trust: Heart rate synchrony and arousal during joint action increased by public goods game. Physiology & behavior 149: 101--106.Google Scholar
- S. Mohammed and E. Ringseis. 2001. Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85, 2: 310--335.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Mønster, Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson, Jacob Kjær Eskildsen, and Sebastian Wallot. 2016. Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology & Behavior 156: 24--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian Mullen and Carolyn Copper. 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological bulletin 115, 2: 210.Google Scholar
- Reiner Nikula. 1991. Psychological correlates of nonspecific skin conductance responses. Psychophysiology 28, 1: 86--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Redmond G O'Connell, Mark A Bellgrove, Paul M Dockree, Adam Lau, Michael Fitzgerald, and Ian H Robertson. 2008. Self-alert training: Volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 46, 5: 1379--1390.Google ScholarCross Ref
- JF Papillo and D Shapiro. 1990. The cardiovascular system In JT Cacioppo and LG Tassinary (Eds.) Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 456--512). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Suzanne J. Peterson, Christopher S. Reina, David A. Waldman, and William J. Becker. 2015. Using physiological methods to study emotions in organizations. In New Ways of Studying Emotions in Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1--27.Google Scholar
- Katherine W. Phillips. 2003. The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 3--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristopher J. Preacher and Ken Kelley. 2011. Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological methods 16, 2: 93.Google Scholar
- Rainer Reisenzein, Markus Studtmann, and Gernot Horstmann. 2013. Coherence between emotion and facial expression: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Emotion Review 5, 1: 16--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Idalmis Santiesteban, Sarah White, Jennifer Cook, Sam J Gilbert, Cecilia Heyes, and Geoffrey Bird. 2012. Training social cognition: from imitation to theory of mind. Cognition 122, 2: 228--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karen L. Schmidt, Zara Ambadar, Jeffrey F. Cohn, and L. Ian Reed. 2006. Movement differences between deliberate and spontaneous facial expressions: Zygomaticus major action in smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 30, 1: 37--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janienke Sturm, Olga Houben-van Herwijnen, Anke Eyck, and Jacques Terken. 2007. Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, 263--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henri Tajfel and John C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In (2nd ed.), Stephen Worchel (ed.). Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, 7--24.Google Scholar
- Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Johannes Schöning, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2014. Investigating the effects of using biofeedback as visual stress indicator during videomediated collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 71--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas A. Timmerman. 2000. Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research 31, 5: 592--606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Triandis, L. Kurowski, and M. Gelfand. 1994. Workplace diversity. In H. Triandis, M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds.). Consulting Psychologists Press., Palo Alto, CA, 769--827.Google Scholar
- Piercarlo Valdesolo, Jennifer Ouyang, and David DeSteno. 2010. The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 4: 693--695.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruth Wageman, J. Richard Hackman, and Erin Lehman. 2005. Team Diagnostic Survey Development of an Instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41, 4: 373--398.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott S. Wiltermuth and Chip Heath. 2009. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological science 20, 1: 1--5.Google Scholar
- Piotr Winkielman and John T. Cacioppo. 2001. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of personality and social psychology 81, 6: 989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gwen M. Wittenbaum, Garold Stasser, and Carol J. Merry. 1996. Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, 2: 129--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anita Williams Woolley and Ishani Aggarwal. Collective intelligence and group learning. In Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning, Linda Argote and J. M Levine (eds.). Oxford University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Anita Williams Woolley and Ishani Aggarwal. The mind and the heart of the group: Collective intelligence and relationship quality in task performing teams. Under review.Google Scholar
- Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, and Thomas W. Malone. 2015. Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24, 6: 420--424.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330, 6004: 686--688.Google Scholar
- Anita Williams Woolley, Rosalind M. Chow, Anna T. Mayo, Jin Wook Chang, and Christoph Riedl. 2016. Competition and collective intelligence: Do women always make groups smarter? Under review.Google Scholar
- Zhiwen Yu and Yuichi Nakamura. 2010. Smart meeting systems: A survey of state-of-the-art and open issues. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 42, 2: 8. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Deep Structures of Collaboration: Physiological Correlates of Collective Intelligence and Group Satisfaction
Recommendations
Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCollective intelligence (CI) is a property of groups that emerges from the coordination and collaboration of members and predicts group performance on a wide range of tasks. Previous studies of CI have been conducted with lab-based groups in the USA. We ...
Exploring skin conductance synchronisation in everyday interactions
NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, FoundationalDetecting interpersonal and emotional aspects of behaviour is a growing area of research within HCI. However, this work primarily processes data from individuals, rather than drawing on the dynamics of an interaction between people. Literature in social ...
Monitoring in collaborative learning: Co-occurrence of observed behavior and physiological synchrony explored
AbstractAlthough research on collaborative learning suggests that monitoring plays an important role in successful regulation of the collaborative learning process, little is known about how students attend to it together. This study explores ...
Highlights- Monitoring in collaborative learning was studied with video and physiological data.
Comments