skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998233acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

WAKEY: Assisting Parent-child Communication for Better Morning Routines

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parent-child communication is an essential element in behavioral and character development in early childhood; however, parents may find it difficult to be aware of how they talk to their children. Through extensive field studies with experts and parents, we found that parents are more likely to experience communication conflict with preschool children (3-6 years old) on school mornings. In consultation with domain professionals and families, we designed WAKEY, a technology-based approach that helps parents use better communication strategies to teach preschool children to carry out their morning routines. Following the intervention with WAKEY, parents reported significantly reduced levels of frustration during morning routines and greater independent behavior by children. Furthermore, parents reported experiencing changes in their parenting attitudes and finding new insights into communication.

References

  1. R. A. Barkley. Defiant children: A clinician's manual for assessment and parent training. Guilford Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Baroni, M. Nalin, M. Coti Zelati, E. Oleari, and A. Sanna. Designing motivational robot: How robots might motivate children to eat fruits and vegetables. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on, pages 796--801. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. G. Burgar, P. S. Lum, P. C. Shor, and H. M. Van der Loos. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the palo alto va/stanford experience. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 37(6):663--674, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y.-C. Chang, J.-L. Lo, C.-J. Huang, N.-Y. Hsu, H.-H. Chu, H.-Y. Wang, P.-Y. Chi, and Y.-L. Hsieh. Playful toothbrush: ubicomp technology for teaching tooth brushing to kindergarten children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 363--372. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Chidambaram, Y.-H. Chiang, and B. Mutlu. Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 293--300. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Consolvo, D. W. McDonald, T. Toscos, M. Y. Chen, J. Froehlich, B. Harrison, P. Klasnja, A. LaMarca, L. LeGrand, R. Libby, et al. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1797--1806. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Davidoff, M. K. Lee, C. Yiu, J. Zimmerman, and A. K. Dey. Principles of smart home control. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pages 19--34. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Davidoff, J. Zimmerman, and A. K. Dey. How routine learners can support family coordination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2461--2470. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. Eagle and A. S. Pentland. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 10(4):255--268, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. J. Fogg. Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 225--232. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. J. Fogg. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity, 2002(December):5, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Glick, J. A. DeMorest, and C. A. Hotze. Keeping your distance: Group membership, personal space, and requests for small favors1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(4):315--330, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Hinojosa and P. Kramer. Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 5(4):213, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. I. Hwang, C. Yoo, C. Hwang, D. Yim, Y. Lee, C. Min, J. Kim, and J. Song. Talkbetter: family-driven mobile intervention care for children with language delay. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 1283--1296. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Jeong, K. D. Santos, S. Graca, B. O'Connell, L. Anderson, N. Stenquist, K. fitzpatrick, H. Goodenough, D. Logan, P. Weinstock, et al. Designing a socially assistive robot for pediatric care. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 387--390. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. K. Judge, C. Neustaedter, and A. F. Kurtz. The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2361--2370. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. I. Kim Berg and T. Steiner. Childrens solution work. New York & London: Norton, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. J. Lin, L. Mamykina, S. Lindtner, G. Delajoux, and H. B. Strub. fishnsteps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, pages 261--278. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. B. MacDonald. Socialization in the context of the family: a sociobiological perspective. In Sociobiological Perspectives on Human Development, pages 320--339. Springer, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. E. Medhus. Hearing is Believing: How Words Can Make Or Break Our Children. New World Library, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Neustaedter and A. Bernheim Brush. Linc-ing the family: the participatory design of an inkable family calendar. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 141--150. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Niculescu, B. van Dijk, A. Nijholt, H. Li, and S. L. See. Making social robots more attractive: the effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy. International journal of social robotics, 5(2):171--191, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. L. M. Popov and R. A. Ilesanmi. Parent-child relationship: Peculiarities and outcome. Review of European Studies, 7(5):253, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. H. Raffle, R. Ballagas, G. Revelle, H. Horii, S. Follmer, J. Go, E. Reardon, K. Mori, J. Kaye, and M. Spasojevic. Family story play: reading with young children (and elmo) over a distance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1583--1592. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. K. K. Reardon. Persuasion in practice. Sage, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Sellen, R. Harper, R. Eardley, S. Izadi, T. Regan, A. S. Taylor, and K. R. Wood. Homenote: supporting situated messaging in the home. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 383--392. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. T. Sonne, J. Müller, P. Marshall, C. Obel, and K. Grønbæk. Changing family practices with assistive technology: Mobero improves morning and bedtime routines for children with adhd. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Asada, and T. Musha. Robot therapy for prevention of dementia at home. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 19(6):691, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S. Yarosh, Y. Chieh, G. D. Abowd, et al. Supporting parent-child communication in divorced families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2):192--203, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Yarosh, S. Cuzzort, H. Müller, and G. D. Abowd. Developing a media space for remote synchronous parent-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 97--105. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. T. Yeganyan, M. Cramer, L. A. Boyd, and G. R. Hayes. vsked: an interactive visual schedule system for use in classrooms for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 319--322. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. WAKEY: Assisting Parent-child Communication for Better Morning Routines

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader