ABSTRACT
Crowdsourcing systems accomplish large tasks with scale and speed by breaking work down into independent parts. However, many types of complex creative work, such as fiction writing, have remained out of reach for crowds because work is tightly interdependent: changing one part of a story may trigger changes to the overall plot and vice versa. Taking inspiration from how expert authors write, we propose a technique for achieving interdependent complex goals with crowds. With this technique, the crowd loops between reflection, to select a high-level goal, and revision, to decompose that goal into low-level, actionable tasks. We embody this approach in Mechanical Novel, a system that crowdsources short fiction stories on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In a field experiment, Mechanical Novel resulted in higher-quality stories than an iterative crowdsourcing workflow. Our findings suggest that orienting crowd work around high-level goals may enable workers to coordinate their effort to accomplish complex work.
- Foldingstory. http://foldingstory.com/.Google Scholar
- Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M. Pattern languages. Center for Environmental Structure 2 (1977).Google Scholar
- Andre, P., Kittur, A., and Dow, S. P. Crowd synthesis: Extracting categories and clusters from complex data. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 989--998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bayles, D., Orland, T., and Morey, A. Art & fear. Tantor Media, Incorporated, 2012.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, M. S., Little, G., Miller, R. C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M. S., Karger, D. R., Crowell, D., and Panovich, K. Soylent: A word processor with a crowd inside. In Proc. UIST, UIST '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 313--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P., Bernstein, M. S., and Adar, E. Human-computer interaction and collective intelligence. In Collective Intelligence Handbook. MIT Press, 2015.Google Scholar
- Burroway, J. Imaginative writing: The elements of craft. Longman, 2003.Google Scholar
- Chan, J., Dang, S., Kremer, P., Guo, L., and Dow, S. Ideagens: A social ideation system for guided crowd brainstorming. In Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (2014).Google Scholar
- Chilton, L. B., Little, G., Edge, D., Weld, D. S., and Landay, J. A. Cascade: Crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. In Proc. CHI, CHI '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1999--2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- d.school, S. Design method: I like, i wish, what if. http://dschool.stanford.edu/wp-content/themes/dschool/method-cards/i-like-i-wish-what-if.pdf.Google Scholar
- Flower, L., and Hayes, J. R. A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication (1981), 365--387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fraser, R., and Wickes, G. Aldous huxley: The art of fiction no. 24. The Paris Review 23 (1960).Google Scholar
- Hahn, N., Chang, J., Kim, J. E., and Kittur, A. The knowledge accelerator: Big picture thinking in small pieces. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2258--2270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hill, B. M., and Monroy-Hernández, A. The cost of collaboration for code and art: Evidence from a remixing community. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1035--1046. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jansson, D. G., and Smith, S. M. Design fixation. Design studies 12, 1 (1991), 3--11.Google Scholar
- Kim, H.-C. E., and Eklundh, K. S. Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 10, 2 (Jan. 2001), 247--259. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, J., Cheng, J., and Bernstein, M. S. Ensemble: Exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 745--755. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, J., and Monroy-Hernandez, A. Storia: Summarizing social media content based on narrative theory using crowdsourcing. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '16 (2016), 1018--1027. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., and Kraut, R. E. Crowdforge: Crowdsourcing complex work. In Proc. UIST, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 43--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koblin, A. The Johnny Cash Project, 2010. http://www.thejohnnycashproject.com/.Google Scholar
- Kulkarni, A., Can, M., and Hartmann, B. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 1003--1012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lasecki, W., Miller, C., Sadilek, A., Abumoussa, A., Borrello, D., Kushalnagar, R., and Bigham, J. Real-time captioning by groups of non-experts. In Proc. UIST, UIST '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 23--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lasecki, W. S., Kim, J., Rafter, N., Sen, O., Bigham, J. P., and Bernstein, M. S. Apparition: Crowdsourced user interfaces that come to life as you sketch them. In Proc. CHI, CHI '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 1925--1934. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lasecki, W. S., Wesley, R., Nichols, J., Kulkarni, A., Allen, J. F., and Bigham, J. P. Chorus: A crowd-powered conversational assistant. In Proc. UIST, UIST '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 151--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Little, G., Chilton, L. B., Goldman, M., and Miller, R. C. Exploring iterative and parallel human computation processes. In Proc. HCOMP, HCOMP '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 68--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Little, G., Chilton, L. B., Goldman, M., and Miller, R. C. Turkit: Human computation algorithms on mechanical turk. In Proc. UIST, UIST '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 57--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luther, K., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1007--1022. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mason, B., and Thomas, S. A million penguins research report. Institute of Creative Technologies, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom (2008).Google Scholar
- Nebeling, M., To, A., Guo, A., de Freitas, A. A., Teevan, J., Dow, S. P., and Bigham, J. P. Wearwrite: Crowd-assisted writing from smartwatches. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 3834--3846. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noel, S., and Robert, J.-M. Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Comput. Supported Coop. Work 13, 1 (Jan. 2004), 63--89. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pecher, D., and Zwaan, R. A. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Retelny, D., Robaszkiewicz, S., To, A., Lasecki, W. S., Patel, J., Rahmati, N., Doshi, T., Valentine, M., and Bernstein, M. S. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proc. UIST, UIST '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 75--85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schon, D. A. The reflective practioner. London: Temple Smith (1983).Google Scholar
- Sharples, M. An account of writing as creative design. Psychology Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Simpson, R., Page, K. R., and De Roure, D. Zooniverse: Observing the world's largest citizen science platform. In Proc. WWW, WWW '14 Companion (2014), 1049--1054. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teevan, J., Iqbal, S. T., and von Veh, C. Supporting collaborative writing with microtasks. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2657--2668. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, J. D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
- Verroios, V., and Bernstein, M. S. Context trees: Crowdsourcing global understanding from local views. In HCOMP 2014 (November 2014).Google Scholar
- WeAreDynamo. Guidelines for academic requesters. http://wiki.wearedynamo.org/index.php/Guidelines_for_Academic_Requesters. {Online; accessed 12-May-2015}.Google Scholar
- Xu, A., Huang, S.-W., and Bailey, B. Voyant: Generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 1433--1444. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, L., and Nickerson, J. V. Cooks or cobblers?: Crowd creativity through combination. In Proc. CHI, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 1393--1402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, H., Law, E., Miller, R., Gajos, K., Parkes, D., and Horvitz, E. Human computation tasks with global constraints. In Proc. CHI, CHI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 217--226. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work through Reflection and Revision
Recommendations
Ensemble: exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration
CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computingIn story writing, the diverse perspectives of the crowd could support an author's search for the perfect character, setting, or plot. However, structuring crowd collaboration is challenging. Too little structure leads to unfocused, sprawling narratives, ...
Designing Crowdsourcing Techniques Based on Expert Creative Practice
C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and CognitionCurrent crowdsourcing workflows comprise of discrete tasks that guide the crowd towards predetermined goals. However, this approach is ill-suited towards supporting massively collaborative open-ended creative work, which often involves an exploration of ...
Mechanical turk as an ontology engineer?: using microtasks as a component of an ontology-engineering workflow
WebSci '13: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science ConferenceOntology evaluation has proven to be one of the more difficult problems in ontology engineering. Researchers proposed numerous methods to evaluate logical correctness of an ontology, its structure, or coverage of a domain represented by a corpus. ...
Comments