skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998196acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work through Reflection and Revision

Published:25 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Crowdsourcing systems accomplish large tasks with scale and speed by breaking work down into independent parts. However, many types of complex creative work, such as fiction writing, have remained out of reach for crowds because work is tightly interdependent: changing one part of a story may trigger changes to the overall plot and vice versa. Taking inspiration from how expert authors write, we propose a technique for achieving interdependent complex goals with crowds. With this technique, the crowd loops between reflection, to select a high-level goal, and revision, to decompose that goal into low-level, actionable tasks. We embody this approach in Mechanical Novel, a system that crowdsources short fiction stories on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In a field experiment, Mechanical Novel resulted in higher-quality stories than an iterative crowdsourcing workflow. Our findings suggest that orienting crowd work around high-level goals may enable workers to coordinate their effort to accomplish complex work.

References

  1. Foldingstory. http://foldingstory.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M. Pattern languages. Center for Environmental Structure 2 (1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Andre, P., Kittur, A., and Dow, S. P. Crowd synthesis: Extracting categories and clusters from complex data. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 989--998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bayles, D., Orland, T., and Morey, A. Art & fear. Tantor Media, Incorporated, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, M. S., Little, G., Miller, R. C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M. S., Karger, D. R., Crowell, D., and Panovich, K. Soylent: A word processor with a crowd inside. In Proc. UIST, UIST '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bigham, J. P., Bernstein, M. S., and Adar, E. Human-computer interaction and collective intelligence. In Collective Intelligence Handbook. MIT Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Burroway, J. Imaginative writing: The elements of craft. Longman, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, J., Dang, S., Kremer, P., Guo, L., and Dow, S. Ideagens: A social ideation system for guided crowd brainstorming. In Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chilton, L. B., Little, G., Edge, D., Weld, D. S., and Landay, J. A. Cascade: Crowdsourcing taxonomy creation. In Proc. CHI, CHI '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. d.school, S. Design method: I like, i wish, what if. http://dschool.stanford.edu/wp-content/themes/dschool/method-cards/i-like-i-wish-what-if.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Flower, L., and Hayes, J. R. A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication (1981), 365--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fraser, R., and Wickes, G. Aldous huxley: The art of fiction no. 24. The Paris Review 23 (1960).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hahn, N., Chang, J., Kim, J. E., and Kittur, A. The knowledge accelerator: Big picture thinking in small pieces. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2258--2270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hill, B. M., and Monroy-Hernández, A. The cost of collaboration for code and art: Evidence from a remixing community. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1035--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jansson, D. G., and Smith, S. M. Design fixation. Design studies 12, 1 (1991), 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, H.-C. E., and Eklundh, K. S. Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 10, 2 (Jan. 2001), 247--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kim, J., Cheng, J., and Bernstein, M. S. Ensemble: Exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 745--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kim, J., and Monroy-Hernandez, A. Storia: Summarizing social media content based on narrative theory using crowdsourcing. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '16 (2016), 1018--1027. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kittur, A., Smus, B., Khamkar, S., and Kraut, R. E. Crowdforge: Crowdsourcing complex work. In Proc. UIST, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Koblin, A. The Johnny Cash Project, 2010. http://www.thejohnnycashproject.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kulkarni, A., Can, M., and Hartmann, B. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 1003--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lasecki, W., Miller, C., Sadilek, A., Abumoussa, A., Borrello, D., Kushalnagar, R., and Bigham, J. Real-time captioning by groups of non-experts. In Proc. UIST, UIST '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 23--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lasecki, W. S., Kim, J., Rafter, N., Sen, O., Bigham, J. P., and Bernstein, M. S. Apparition: Crowdsourced user interfaces that come to life as you sketch them. In Proc. CHI, CHI '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 1925--1934. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lasecki, W. S., Wesley, R., Nichols, J., Kulkarni, A., Allen, J. F., and Bigham, J. P. Chorus: A crowd-powered conversational assistant. In Proc. UIST, UIST '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 151--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Little, G., Chilton, L. B., Goldman, M., and Miller, R. C. Exploring iterative and parallel human computation processes. In Proc. HCOMP, HCOMP '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 68--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Little, G., Chilton, L. B., Goldman, M., and Miller, R. C. Turkit: Human computation algorithms on mechanical turk. In Proc. UIST, UIST '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Luther, K., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proc. CSCW, CSCW '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 1007--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mason, B., and Thomas, S. A million penguins research report. Institute of Creative Technologies, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nebeling, M., To, A., Guo, A., de Freitas, A. A., Teevan, J., Dow, S. P., and Bigham, J. P. Wearwrite: Crowd-assisted writing from smartwatches. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 3834--3846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Noel, S., and Robert, J.-M. Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Comput. Supported Coop. Work 13, 1 (Jan. 2004), 63--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pecher, D., and Zwaan, R. A. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Retelny, D., Robaszkiewicz, S., To, A., Lasecki, W. S., Patel, J., Rahmati, N., Doshi, T., Valentine, M., and Bernstein, M. S. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proc. UIST, UIST '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schon, D. A. The reflective practioner. London: Temple Smith (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharples, M. An account of writing as creative design. Psychology Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Simpson, R., Page, K. R., and De Roure, D. Zooniverse: Observing the world's largest citizen science platform. In Proc. WWW, WWW '14 Companion (2014), 1049--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Teevan, J., Iqbal, S. T., and von Veh, C. Supporting collaborative writing with microtasks. In Proc. CHI, CHI '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2657--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Thompson, J. D. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction publishers, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Verroios, V., and Bernstein, M. S. Context trees: Crowdsourcing global understanding from local views. In HCOMP 2014 (November 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. WeAreDynamo. Guidelines for academic requesters. http://wiki.wearedynamo.org/index.php/Guidelines_for_Academic_Requesters. {Online; accessed 12-May-2015}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu, A., Huang, S.-W., and Bailey, B. Voyant: Generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 1433--1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yu, L., and Nickerson, J. V. Cooks or cobblers?: Crowd creativity through combination. In Proc. CHI, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 1393--1402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Zhang, H., Law, E., Miller, R., Gajos, K., Parkes, D., and Horvitz, E. Human computation tasks with global constraints. In Proc. CHI, CHI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work through Reflection and Revision

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      February 2017
      2556 pages
      ISBN:9781450343350
      DOI:10.1145/2998181

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate183of530submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader