skip to main content
article
Free Access

WIDE workflow development methodology

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 1999Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The development of workflows (WFs) for complex organizations to be interfaced with existing information systems requires a specific methodological approach to guarantee benefits and effectiveness of the final results. In fact, the WF should be well integrated in the organization both from the technical and the organizational point of view. While the characteristics of the Workflow Management System (WFMS) platform adopted in the implementation are relevant to establish the boundary between the workflow system and other related applications, it is also important that the analysis and design phases are developed independently of those characteristics.The WF development methodology proposed in this paper starts with an analysis phase based on UML, adopted for business process descriptions and business goals. The design phase proposes a pattern-based approach to workflow schemas design, based on the WIDE WF model. This model allows a flexible representation of the exceptions which may occur during WF execution. It also considers the interaction of the WF with external applications and information systems. Finally, the paper briefly discusses the mapping to commercial and prototype WFMSs.

References

  1. 1 J. Arlow, W. Emmerich, J. Quinn. Literate modelling - Capturing business knowledge with the UML. UML'98. Toulouse, France. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 A.I. Anton, W.M. McCracken, C. Potts. Goal decomposition and scenario analysis in business process reengineering. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. CAiSE'94, Ultrecht, The Netherlands, June 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 V. R. Basili, L. C. Briand and W. Melo, How reuse influences quality and productivity in objectoriented systems, Communications of the ACM, Volume 39, n. 10, pp 104-l 16, October 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Y. Bernard, A. Canals. Use of Cisi UML development process on GEDYS Project. UML 98, Toulouse, France. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Cosa Reference Manual, Software-Ley GmbH, September 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 R. Flores. The Value of a Methodology for Workflow, Action Technologies, Inc, 1997 Available from http://www.actiontech.com/market/marketingdocs/meth od5.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 P. Grefen, B. Pernici, G. Sanchez, (eds.), Database Support for Workflow Management - The WIDE Project, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 Object-oriented strategies, the monthly newsletter for managers and developers of object-oriented systems. Vol. VII, No. 12. P. Harmon Ed. Dec. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Hewlett Packard. Changengine Admin. Edition (AdminFlow) Process Design Guide. Edition 1 .O. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 IBM FlowMark - Modeling Workflows, IBM Corporation, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 H. Stark, L. Lachal. Ovum Evaluates: Workflow, Ovum Ltd., 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 A.G. Sutcliffe, N.A.M. Maiden. Bridging the Requirements Gap: Policies, Goals and Domains. Seventh International Workshop on Software Specification and Design '93 (IWSSD). 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 Unified Modeling Language summary, version 1.1, September 1997. Rational Software Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 UML Extension for Business Modeling, vers. 1.1, Sept. 1997, www.rational.cornluml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 0. Wiegert. Business process modeling and workflow definition with UML. Working paper. SAP AG 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 D. Hollingsworth, Workflow management Coalition, the 1994 Workflow Reference Model, Technical Report n. TCOO-1003, November 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. WIDE workflow development methodology

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
          ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 24, Issue 2
          March 1999
          238 pages
          ISSN:0163-5948
          DOI:10.1145/295666
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1999 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 1999

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader