skip to main content
10.1145/2971763.2971771acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EyeContact: scleral coil eye tracking for virtual reality

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eye tracking is a technology of growing importance for mobile and wearable systems, particularly for newly emerging virtual and augmented reality applications (VR and AR). Current eye tracking solutions for wearable AR and VR headsets rely on optical tracking and achieve a typical accuracy of 0.5° to 1°. We investigate a high temporal and spatial resolution eye tracking system based on magnetic tracking using scleral search coils. This technique has historically relied on large generator coils several meters in diameter or requires a restraint for the user's head. We propose a wearable scleral search coil tracking system that allows the user to walk around, and eliminates the need for a head restraint or room-sized coils. Our technique involves a unique placement of generator coils as well as a new calibration approach that accounts for the less uniform magnetic field created by the smaller coils. Using this technique, we can estimate the orientation of the eye with a mean calibrated accuracy of 0.094°.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Peter Bremen, Robert F Van der Willigen, and A John Van Opstal. 2007. Applying double magnetic induction to measure two-dimensional head-unrestrained gaze shifts in human subjects. Journal of neurophysiology 98, 6 (2007), 3759--3769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andreas Bulling, Daniel Roggen, and Gerhard Tröster. 2009. Wearable EOG goggles: Seamless sensing and context-awareness in everyday environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 1, 2 (2009), 157--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H Collewijn, F Van der Mark, and TC Jansen. 1975. Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision research 15, 3 (1975), 447--IN5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Maia Garau, Mel Slater, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Andrea Brogni, Anthony Steed, and Martina Angela Sasse. 2003. The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 5--10, 2003. 529--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Brian Guenter, Mark Finch, Steven Drucker, Desney Tan, and John Snyder. 2012. Foveated 3D graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 6 (2012), 164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mark MJ Houben, Janine Goumans, and Johannes van der Steen. 2006. Recording three-dimensional eye movements: scleral search coils versus video oculography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 47, 1 (2006), 179--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kyung-Nam Kim and RS Ramakrishna. 1999. Vision-based eye-gaze tracking for human computer interface. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1999. IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 324--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F Landis Markley and Daniele Mortari. 1999. How to estimate attitude from vector observations. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Susana Martinez-Conde, Jorge Otero-Millan, and Stephen L Macknik. 2013. The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14, 2 (2013), 83--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anton Plotkin, Oren Shafrir, Eugene Paperno, and Daniel M Kaplan. 2010. Magnetic eye tracking: A new approach employing a planar transmitter. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 57, 5 (2010), 1209--1215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. JPH Reulen and L Bakker. 1982. The measurement of eye movement using double magnetic induction. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 11 (1982), 740--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dale Roberts, Mark Shelhamer, and Aaron Wong. 2008. A new wireless search-coil system. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications. ACM, 197--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David Robinson and others. 1963. A method of measuring eye movemnent using a scieral search coil in a magnetic field. Bio-medical Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 10, 4 (1963), 137--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jakob S Thomassen, Giacomo Di Benedetto, and Bernhard JM Hess. 2010. Decoding 3D search coil signals in a non-homogeneous magnetic field. Vision research 50, 13 (2010), 1203--1213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. EyeContact: scleral coil eye tracking for virtual reality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2016
      207 pages
      ISBN:9781450344609
      DOI:10.1145/2971763

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ISWC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate18of95submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader