skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971703acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spotting prejudice with nonverbal behaviours

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite prejudice cannot be directly observed, nonverbal behaviours provide profound hints on people inclinations. In this paper, we use recent sensing technologies and machine learning techniques to automatically infer the results of psychological questionnaires frequently used to assess implicit prejudice. In particular, we recorded 32 students discussing with both white and black collaborators. Then, we identified a set of features allowing automatic extraction and measured their degree of correlation with psychological scores. Results confirmed that automated analysis of nonverbal behaviour is actually possible thus paving the way for innovative clinical tools and eventually more secure societies.

References

  1. Audacity Team. 1999-2016. Audacity. (1999-2016). http://www.audacityteam.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tobias Baur, Ionut Damian, Florian Lingenfelser, Johannes Wagner, and Elisabeth André. 2013. Human Behavior Understanding: 4th International Workshop, HBU 2013, Barcelona, Spain, October 22, 2013. Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Chapter NovA: Automated Analysis of Nonverbal Signals in Social Interactions, 160--171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02714-2_14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stefan Benus, Frank Enos, Julia Bell Hirschberg, and Elizabeth Shriberg. 2006. Pauses in deceptive speech. Proc. ISCA 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Bharathi, A. Singh, C. Tucker, and H. Nembhard. 2016. Knowledge Discovery of Game Design Features By Mining User-Generated Feedback. Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016), 361--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nicola Bicocchi, Damiano Fontana, and Franco Zambonelli. 2014. A self-aware, reconfigurable architecture for context awareness. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC 2014, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, June 23-26, 2014. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nicola Bicocchi, Matteo Lasagni, and Franco Zambonelli. 2012. Bridging vision and commonsense for multimodal situation recognition in pervasive systems. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Lugano, Switzerland, March 19-23, 2012. 48--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Keith Brawner and Benjamin Goldberg. 2012. Real-time monitoring of ecg and gsr signals during computer-based training. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 72--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nathan Burba, Mark Bolas, David M Krum, Evan Suma, and others. 2012. Unobtrusive measurement of subtle nonverbal behaviors with the Microsoft Kinect. In Virtual Reality Short Papers and Posters (VRW), 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Burns, B.R. Greene, M.J. McGrath, T.J. O'Shea, B. Kuris, S.M. Ayer, F. Stroiescu, and V. Cionca. 2010. SHIMMER x2122; x2013; A Wireless Sensor Platform for Noninvasive Biomedical Research. Sensors Journal, IEEE 10, 9 (Sept 2010), 1527--1534. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.2045498Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. John F Dovidio, Kerry Kawakami, and Samuel L Gaertner. 2002. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology 82, 1 (2002), 62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Denise Frauendorfer, Marianne Schmid Mast, Laurent Nguyen, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2014. Nonverbal Social Sensing in Action: Unobtrusive Recording and Extracting of Nonverbal Behavior in Social Interactions Illustrated with a Research Example. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38, 2 (2014), 231--245. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0173-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jonathan Gratch, Ron Artstein, Gale M Lucas, Giota Stratou, Stefan Scherer, Angela Nazarian, Rachel Wood, Jill Boberg, David DeVault, Stacy Marsella, and others. 2014. The Distress Analysis Interview Corpus of human and computer interviews.. In LREC. 3123--3128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, and J. L. K. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998), 1464--1480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. G. Greenwald, B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji. 2003. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003), 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Handri, K. Yajima, S. Nomura, N. Ogawa, Y. Kurosawa, and Y. Fukumura. 2010. Evaluation of Student's Physiological Response Towards E-Learning Courses Material by Using GSR Sensor. In Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on. 805--810. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2010.92 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Béatrice S Hasler, Oren Salomon, Peleg Tuchman, Ady Nae O'Malley, and Doron A Friedman. 2011. Real-time Translation of Nonverbal Communication in Cross-Cultural Online Encounters. In Proc. of CMVC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M.R. Hebl and Dovidio J.F. 2005. Promoting the social in the examination of social stigmas. Journal of personality and social psychology 9, 9 (2005), 156--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jin Joo Lee, Brad Knox, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2013. Modeling the dynamics of nonverbal behavior on interpersonal trust for human-robot interactions. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Matsumoto and H. C. Hwang. 2016. The cultural bases of nonverbal communication. 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimitris Metaxas and Shaoting Zhang. 2013. A review of motion analysis methods for human nonverbal communication computing. Image and Vision Computing 31, 6 (2013), 421--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joann M. Montepare. 2014. Nonverbal Behavior in the Digital Age: Meanings, Models, and Methods. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38, 3 (2014), 279--281. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0187-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. L. Patterson. 1982. A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. Psychological Review 89 (1982), 231--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Suzanne M Retzinger. 1995. Identifying shame and anger in discourse. The American Behavioral Scientist 38, 8 (1995), 1104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G. Stratou, S. Scherer, J. Gratch, and L.-P. Morency. 2013. Automatic Nonverbal Behavior Indicators of Depression and PTSD: Exploring Gender Differences. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on. 147--152. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.31 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Grace A Sullivan and Wind Goodfriend. 2013. The Effects of Controlling Nonverbal Intimacy. Journal Contents 18, 2 (2013), 32--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andrea Stevenson Won, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Joris H Janssen. 2014a. Automatic detection of nonverbal behavior predicts learning in dyadic interactions. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on 5, 2 (2014), 112--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Andrea Stevenson Won, Jeremy N Bailenson, Suzanne C Stathatos, and Wenqing Dai. 2014b. Automatically detected nonverbal behavior predicts creativity in collaborating dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38, 3 (2014), 389--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yang Rui Zhang, Guang Huo, Jian Feng Wu, Jun Bo Yang, and Chen Pang. 2015. An Interactive Oral Training Platform Based on Kinect for EFL Learning. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 704. Trans Tech Publ, 419--423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhengyou Zhang. 2012. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. MultiMedia, IEEE 19, 2 (2012), 4--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Spotting prejudice with nonverbal behaviours

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2016
          1288 pages
          ISBN:9781450344616
          DOI:10.1145/2971648

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 September 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate101of389submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader