ABSTRACT
This paper presents the study of a volunteer community, its technologies, and the processes in and through which it develops, sustains and makes its community artifact ecology work. Based on previous work proposing the concept of community artifact ecology as a way of understanding the constellation of technologies a community owns, has access to and uses in their practices, we examine the dynamics and development of such a community artifact ecology in detail. The findings indicate that in volunteer communities developing a working community artifact ecology is a process mixing happenstance, community strategies and everyday tailoring and appropriation tactics. Additionally, much of the design and infrastructuring work in shaping the community artifact ecology and making it work both blurs with use and can be considered as intrinsic design as it is conducted by members of the community, with no input from the outside. Based on the empirical findings we expand on multiple positions within the theoretical space of design-in-use and intrinsic practice transformation mediated by technology and conclude with a more multi-faceted understanding of the shaping of technology in volunteer-based communities.
- Bell, G. Making sense of museums: The museum as 'cultural ecology'. Intel Labs 1 (2002).Google Scholar
- Bødker, S., and Christiansen, E. Poetry in motion: appropriation of the world of apps. In Proceedings of the 30th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, ACM (2012), 78--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S., and Klokmose, C. N. Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, ACM (2012), 448--457. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S., Korsgaard, H., and Saad-Sulonen, J. 'A farmer, a place and at least 20 members': The development of artifact ecologies in volunteer-based communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 1142--1156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S., and Polli, A. M. Between initial familiarity and future use: A case of collocated collaborative writing. In COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 27-30 May 2014, Nice (France), Springer International Publishing (Cham, 2014), 137--154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Certeau, M. The Practice of Everyday Life/Michel de Certeau; translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Dittrich, Y., Eriksén, S., and Hansson, C. Pd in the wild; evolving practices of design in use. In Participatory Design Conference, CPRS (Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility) (2002).Google Scholar
- Dourish, P. Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '06, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 299--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gantt, M., and Nardi, B. A. Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among cad users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (1992), 107--117. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henderson, A., and Kyng, M. There's no place like home: Continuing design in use. In Design at work, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. (1992), 219--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., and Siegel, M. Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: How are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Building Bridges, NordiCHI '08, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 201--210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaptelinin, V., and Bannon, L. J. Interaction design beyond the product: Creating technology-enhanced activity spaces. HumanComputer Interaction 27, 3 (2012), 277--309.Google Scholar
- Kvale, S. Doing interviews. Sage, 2008.Google Scholar
- Lyle, P., Choi, J. H.-j., and Foth, M. Designing for grassroots food production: an event-based urban agriculture community. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design, ACM (2014), 362--365. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., and Moran, T. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (1990), 175--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nardi, B. A., and O'Day, V. L. Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pipek, V., and Wulf, V. Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology*. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 5 (2009), 447--473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schmidt, K. Cooperative work and its articulation: requirements for computer support. Le travail humain (1994), 345--366.Google Scholar
- Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information systems research 7, 1 (1996), 111--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S. L., and Strauss, A. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 8, 1--2 (1999), 9--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Syrjänen, A.-L., and Kuutti, K. From system development toward work improvement: developmental work research as a potential partner method for eud. In End-User Development. Springer, 2011, 123--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-based Community
Recommendations
Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically
This paper is motivated by a methodological interest in how to investigate information infrastructures as an empirical, real-world phenomenon. We argue that research on information infrastructures should not be captive to the prevalent method choice of ...
Sociomateriality: Infrastructuring and Appropriation of Artifacts
TEI '18: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied InteractionThis Studio offers researchers and designers an opportunity to investigate and discuss prototypes and in-process projects from a perspective that expands beyond material aspects, to also cover social and cultural ones. Participants will bring a project, ...
"...it's your project, but it's not necessarily your work...": infrastructuring, situatedness, and designing relational practice
PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1This paper builds on trajectories in PD that attend to designers' situatedness within the broader systemic contexts in which they work. It proposes (re)considering infrastructuring, understood as a range of approaches to designing socio-material systems,...
Comments